Table of contents
1. Thoughts on distinguishing between cramming and being stuffed
speecher:
1. Has the dimension of knowledge and understanding been increased in the process of explanation? (Specifically, list it)
2. Did you iterate the explanation ideas and dimensions at that time by combining the listener's eyes, expressions, movements, and tone in the explanation? (specifically, list them)
Listener:
1. Do you have an advance understanding of this knowledge? (Basis for specific understanding? Mind map? Summary?)
2. Did you ask questions (knowledge? logical thinking?) during the listening process for interaction? (What is the specific question?)
3. Is there any sudden enlightenment in the process of listening? (What exactly?)
2. Recent insights:
1. Break up and reorganize the knowledge particles and then use the Internet; turn the limitation of the single dimension of the traditional human-centered teaching into an infinite dimension
2. Due to the breakthrough of the first point, the single limitation of the teaching location limited to the teaching subject has also become an infinite dimension
3. The use of infinite thinking: formulate a schedule template for elementary school, junior high school, and high school (so that organizations and individuals can customize personalized learning plans based on this template); due to the infinite dimensional transformation of places that take people as the main body and depend on people as the main
body ; It also enables personalized teaching to be implemented without hindrance
4. People who grew up on the Internet will prefer our Internet-based learning method
(I heard a sentence some time ago: any advanced technology will never replace most people, and those who replace most people are often the most the first to embrace these advanced technologies)
Third, let’s have three more math problems:
Four. Summary
There must always be a dream that is unattainable in the eyes of others, and life will be more interesting.