dinner for a few

This is not a movie review.

This is what is bound to happen in the past, present and future.

Here's a quote from the movie:

P-Power

M-Money

K-knowledge 


But this article has nothing to do with the movie.

There is a saying that you often hear:

"People's eyes are sharp"

But in fact, what is more common is that:

P must be in the hands of a few people, and M must also be in the hands of a few people. Similarly, K must be in the hands of a few people.

Dinner for the Few, then, is an inevitability.

Nietzsche, in his book On the Future of German Educational Institutions, which Nietzsche himself refused to publish during his lifetime, also mentioned a few people.

I prefer Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy. Although most of them are incomprehensible, even the parts that I think are comprehensible may not necessarily be what Nietzsche himself meant.

I don't expect to understand Nietzsche. After all, he endured so much that he was considered insane. Of course, his works were written when he was considered insane.


When a person does something that can be understood and accepted by most people, then generally speaking, this thing must be ordinary and mediocre.

Matthew 7:13 King James BibleEnter ye in at the strait gatefor wide is the gateand broad is the waythat leadeth to destructionand many there be which go in thereat.

It also shows that the wider the road and the more people walk, the more crowded it is.

The premise of the phrase "reading changes fate" is compared to those who have not read books.

Of course, the same goes for "knowledge changes destiny".

Not everyone, when most people agree with one thing, then this thing is unprofitable.

Such as the unemployment three-piece set, takeaway, Didi and express delivery.

For example, the three-piece set for further studies, bachelor's, master's and doctorate.

It's not that you don't make money, you can only earn a small amount of money to support your family.

How did dinner for the few end?

There were not many people for dinner, Da Vinci fixed 13 people.

"The Last Supper" is based on the "New Testament". According to the "New Testament: The Gospel of Mark": Jesus went to Jerusalem for the Passover for the last time. The Jewish chief priests conspired to arrest him at night, but there was no one to guide him. At this moment, Judas, a disciple of Jesus, informed the chief priests of the Jewish religion, "How much are you willing to give me if I hand him over to you?" The chief priests of the Jewish religion gave Judas 30 yuan. So Judas made a pact with the chief priests: the man he kissed was Jesus. On Passover, Jesus sat down with 12 disciples for the last supper. He said to the 12 disciples sadly, "I tell you the truth, one of you is going to betray me!" , or shocked, or angry, or excited, or nervous. "The Last Supper" shows the tense scene of this moment. 

Therefore, it is said: "If the granary is real, you know the etiquette; if you have enough food and clothing, you know the honor and disgrace." Therefore, a gentleman is rich and likes to practice his virtue; a villain is rich and suitable for his strength. The abyss is deep and fish live in it, the mountains are deep but beasts go to it, people are rich but benevolence and righteousness are attached. When the rich gain power, they will benefit, but if they lose power, the customers will have nothing to do, and they will be unhappy. Yidi is very beneficial. The proverb says: "The son of a thousand pieces of gold will never die in the market." This is not empty talk. Therefore, it is said: "The prosperity of the world is all for profit; the chaos of the world is for profit." The king of thousands of vehicles, the lord of thousands of families, and the king of hundreds of families are still poor, let alone the people who make up households. !

Eastern History Records , Western Bibles, unprecedented.


Of course, not many people can really understand it.


Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/ZhangRelay/article/details/131544257