Project management, what needs to be done for acceptance, acceptance report ppt
Acceptance report PPT includes:
- Project background (amount, bidding time)
- project function
- Completion
- Acceptance content
- expert review
As-built acceptance materials: detailed design and test report
Project risk management, handling of external factors:
- The contract should be clearly stated, the application for pre-resources, and the estimated time
- Internal risk resolution, through rush work or fast follow-up, rush work means adding people, and fast follow-up means working overtime
What are the project risks:
- cost risk
- technical risk
- cost risk
- schedule risk
- manage risk
Technical Risk Level Description
technical risk |
risk level |
|
maturity |
Existing or partial redesign |
low risk |
Major redesign, but technically feasible |
medium risk |
|
Complex designs or state-of-the-art technically feasible, some research completed |
high risk |
|
Complexity |
Simple design or locally increased complexity |
low risk |
There is a moderate increase in complexity |
medium risk |
|
Significantly increased or extremely complex |
high risk |
|
Correlation |
Not related to existing systems, facilities, or related development units or whose progress depends on existing system facilities or related development units |
low risk |
Performance depends on existing system performance, facilities or related development units |
medium risk |
|
Progress depends on the progress of the new system, facility or related development unit or performance depends on the performance of the new system, facility or related development unit |
high risk |
Fee Risk Level Description
cost risk |
risk level |
|
Task Requirements Clarity |
The task requirements are clear, and the user and the manufacturer have a common understanding of the task |
low risk |
The task requirements are basically clear, and some details need to be further determined |
medium risk |
|
The task requirements are not clear, the user may constantly put forward new requirements or both parties have different understandings of the task requirements |
high risk |
|
Technology Risk Impact |
No high-risk projects, no more than 2 medium-risk projects |
low risk |
No high-risk projects, more than 3 medium-risk projects |
medium risk |
|
Have more than 1 high-risk project |
high risk |
|
Schedule Risk Impact |
No high-risk projects, no more than 2 medium-risk progress indicators |
low risk |
No high-risk projects, but more than 3 medium-risk projects |
medium risk |
|
Have more than 1 high-risk project |
high risk |
|
Accuracy of cost estimates |
Sufficient historical data for similar projects is available and sufficient qualified personnel are available in the cost estimating department |
low risk |
Sufficient qualified personnel available but only partial historical data available |
medium risk |
|
Lack of qualified personnel available and no historical data on similar projects for reference |
high risk |
|
Contract type impact |
fixed price contract |
low risk |
cost plus incentive fee contract |
medium risk |
|
appropriation contract |
high risk |
|
Contract quotation impact |
It is basically consistent with the quotations and forecasted costs of other bidding units |
low risk |
Slightly lower than the quotation and forecast cost of other bidding units |
medium risk |
|
The quotation is significantly lower than the quotation and forecast cost of other bidding units |
high risk |
Schedule Risk Level Description
schedule risk |
risk level |
|
Technology Risk Impact |
No high risk, no more than 2 medium risk projects |
low risk |
No high risk, more than 3 medium risk projects |
medium risk |
|
Have more than 1 high-risk project |
high risk |
|
Rationality of planning |
The plan is realistic and leaves a certain time margin in case the unexpected happens |
low risk |
The plan is solid, but there is no margin for unexpected problems |
medium risk |
|
计划不可靠,不是根据每项研制工作的实际需要来安排时间,而是根据竞争的需要或上级命令来分配时间 |
高风险 |
|
资源充分性 |
资源充足且可供使用 |
低风险 |
现有资源充足,但与其它项目之间有潜在的矛盾冲突,可能因某些预想不到的问题而影响进度 |
中等风险 |
|
现有资源不足或与其它项目之间存在严重的潜在冲突 |
高风险 |
|
项目人员经验 |
参与该项目的人员在类似的项目中已积累了经验,有足够的知识储备可用于该项目 |
低风险 |
参与人员在类似的项目中已有一般性的经验,但在某些关键部门还缺乏有经验的人员 |
中等风险 |
|
参与人员普遍没有在类似项目中工作的经验,关键部门可用的有经验人员很少 |
高风险 |
管理风险级别描述
管理风险 |
风险级别 |
|
领导素质影响 |
领导者决策能力强,很有威望 |
低风险 |
领导者决策能力较强,威望一般 |
中等风险 |
|
领导者决策能力一般,同时也没什么威望 |
高风险 |
|
组织机构影响 |
组织机构健全,各机构间配合密切、融洽,运作效率高 |
低风险 |
组织机构基本完善,运作效率一般 |
中等风险 |
|
组织机构不完善,或虽完善但运作效率很低 |
高风险 |
|
计划条理性 |
计划安排很有条理,且在关键项目上态度较为保守 |
低风险 |
计划安排有序,但在计划安排上态度较激进 |
中等风险 |
|
计划安排没条理,或一般但态度很激进(冒险型) |
高风险 |
|
人员素质 |
人员整体素质高,且人员之间协作能力强 |
低风险 |
人员整体素质较高,但人员之间协作能力一般 |
中等风险 |
|
人员整体素质一般,协作能力也一般 |
高风险 |
|
实力及条件 |
实力雄厚、条件优越且得到大家一致公认 |
低风险 |
实力和条件较好,能胜任项目的研究 |
中等风险 |
|
实力和条件一般,基本能胜任项目研究工作 |
高风险 |
|
各阶段的协调 |
协调能力强,能作好各阶段的协调工作,应付突发事件能力强 |
低风险 |
协调能力较强,正常情况下能保证各阶段的协调一致,应付突发事件的能力一般 |
中等风险 |
|
协调能力一般,应付突发事件的能力差 |
高风险
|