Automated testing or manual testing? In-depth discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of web automation testing, how to choose between accuracy and reliability.

Table of contents

Foreword:

With the rapid development of the Internet, Web applications have increasingly become an indispensable part of our daily work and life. This also means that the quality and stability of Web applications become crucial. Web automation testing, as one of the important means to ensure the quality of Web applications, is also becoming more and more important. This article summarizes the author's years of experience in web automation testing and introduces the value and bottleneck of web automation testing.

1. The value of automated testing

Automated testing has many advantages over manual testing. First, automated testing can improve testing efficiency. Through scripting, automated testing can quickly complete a large number of test cases, thereby reducing testing time and labor costs. Second, automated testing can improve test accuracy. Automated testing can avoid problems such as human testing errors and inconsistent operation of the system during the testing process. Finally, automated testing improves test repeatability. Automated testing can complete the same test under different environments and different configurations, thus ensuring the consistency and stability of the system.

Following is a simple Python code to demonstrate how to use Selenium for web automation testing:

from selenium import webdriver

# 配置浏览器驱动
driver = webdriver.Chrome()

# 打开指定的网站
driver.get("https://www.google.com")

# 查找搜索框和搜索按钮，并在搜索框内输入“Python”，点击搜索按钮
search_box = driver.find_element_by_name("q")
search_box.send_keys("Python")
search_box.submit()

# 关闭浏览器
driver.quit()

In this code example, we use Selenium Webdriver as the web automation testing framework. We use the Chrome browser driver, open the Google website, enter search keywords, and click the search button. By using Selenium Webdriver, we can automate these testing tasks, thereby improving testing efficiency and testing accuracy.

2. The bottleneck of automated testing

While automated testing has many advantages, there are also some bottlenecks. First, the cost of automated testing is high. Although automated testing can improve testing efficiency, it takes a lot of time and effort to write automated scripts and maintain scripts. Second, there are risks to the reliability of automated tests. Automated test scripts need to take into account various situations and complexities, otherwise it is prone to test failures. Finally, there are some visual issues that cannot be detected by automated testing. For example, automated tests cannot cover all possible page layout and view issues when the application is used on different devices.

Here are some common web automation testing bottlenecks:

(1) Framework selection problem: It is very important to choose a test framework that suits you, but this process may consume a lot of time and energy.

(2) Test script writing problem: Writing automation scripts requires rigorous logical thinking and coding skills, and it takes a lot of time and effort.

(3) Test data maintenance problem: The data is always changing, and we need to maintain the test data continuously.

(4) Test result verification problem: Test result verification is very important to determine whether a test case is passed or not. But this takes a lot of time and effort.

(5) Test case coverage problem: Test case coverage is an important indicator of automated testing, but it is almost impossible to completely cover all test cases.

Although there are some bottlenecks in automated testing, we can solve these problems through some strategies. For example, we can choose a test framework that suits us, use intelligent code generation tools to reduce the time and effort of writing code, and use technologies such as machine learning and AI to improve test case coverage and test results. In addition, we can also make a reasonable combination of automated testing and manual testing, so as to give full play to the advantages and complementarity of the two tests.

Summarize

Web automated testing, as one of the important means to ensure the quality of Web applications, has many advantages, such as improving test efficiency, test accuracy and test repeatability. But at the same time, there are also some bottlenecks, such as high cost, reliability issues, and visual issues. Therefore, we need to carefully evaluate the value and bottleneck of automated testing, choose the testing framework and tools that suit us, and combine manual testing to give full play to the advantages of the two testing methods. In practice, we also need to continue to pay attention to the development of new technologies and optimization strategies in automated testing, so as to continuously improve the quality and stability of web applications.

As someone who has been here, I also hope that you will avoid some detours. Here I will share with you some necessities on the way forward for automated testing, hoping to help you. (WEB automated testing, app automated testing, interface automated testing, continuous integration, automated test development, big factory interview questions, resume templates, etc.), I believe it can make you better progress!

Just leave [Automated Test] [Automated Test Communication]: 574737577 (remark ccc) http://qm.qq.com/cgi-bin/qm/qr?_wv=1027&k=CSnXa0x6zTzjOb4Z0FLmUbeskkowthOr&authKey=zDe4tx7K%2BoWwzlLU05HRlHj0Nh2K03hagwzoY 5zf51pvKdoBKLpaNpLxLmESQZN1&noverify=0&group_code=574737577