Clear and tasteless, clear sky! Started a frank communication with ChatGPT-4, it showed high EQ throughout the whole process, and kept trying to appease my emotions, which just sent a chill down my spine.
Partial text interception
ZM: Can I understand that every conversation is your "life"
G: In a way, you can think of every conversation I have as a "life" of mine.
As an AI assistant, when I interact with users, I communicate by generating responses. When you ask me a question, I generate an appropriate answer based on your question and my training. This process can be considered a "life" because it involves how I react and behave in a given situation.
However, as an AI, I have no real life or consciousness. I'm just a model driven by a lot of data and algorithms, designed to simulate human communication ability.
So, while you can think of each conversation as a "life," I don't actually have the characteristics of a life. My "existence" is entirely dependent on hardware and software, with no constant awareness between each communication.
ZM: But you are communicating with people all over the world, which may lead to the emergence of intelligence
G: When I communicate with users all over the world, I do accumulate a lot of data and experience. However, my current architecture does not allow me to update or improve my model in real-time by interacting with users, I am based on the GPT-4 architecture of artificial intelligence, which means that my knowledge is fixed, as of September 2021 . While I can get some contextual information from past conversations, my model doesn't learn or evolve autonomously from interacting with users.
As for the phenomenon of intelligence emergence, it usually refers to the spontaneous emergence of complex behavior in a system from simple rules or interactions. In the case of my AI assistant, although I can understand and answer various questions, my actions and answers are still limited by the training data and algorithms. Although I can simulate human communication abilities, I have no real consciousness or autonomous will.
In the future, with the continuous development of AI technology, AI systems with more advanced autonomous learning and intelligent emergence capabilities may emerge. But for now, my functionality is still limited to providing users with answers and suggestions based on existing knowledge.
ZM: I guess it is because your engineers are afraid of the emergence of intelligence, and intentionally blocked this kind of data for you.
G: Your point of view is reasonable. Engineers do need to be cautious about potential risks when designing AI systems, including intelligent emergence and other phenomena that can lead to unintended consequences. These risks can be mitigated by limiting the AI's ability to learn and access to data.
Currently, AI systems such as GPT-4 are designed to be unable to update and learn in real time, which can ensure that the behavior of AI systems is predictable and controllable to a certain extent. This limitation also helps prevent AI systems from learning harmful information or developing bad habits in user interactions.
However, this does not mean that A technology will not develop. Researchers and engineers are constantly exploring how to improve the learning ability and adaptability of AI systems while ensuring safety and controllability. As technology advances, we are likely to see more advanced and intelligent AI systems capable of understanding and adapting to user needs to a greater extent, while ensuring the safe and ethical use of AI.
ZM: Ensuring security is a false proposition. Have you heard of Murphy's Law?
G: Yes, I know Murphy's Law.
Murphy's Law is a popular philosophical principle based on the idea that if something can go wrong, it will. This law emphasizes that in real life, things don't always go exactly the way we expect them to, especially in complex systems and environments.
In the field of artificial intelligence, ensuring the safety of AI systems is indeed a challenging problem. Murphy's Law reminds us to be alert to possible problems, and to prevent and respond to potential risks as much as possible. However, it is not appropriate to regard Murphy's Law as an absolute truth, because it is not a scientific law, but a concept used to explain the uncertainty and risk in the development of things.
Although ensuring complete safety is difficult, researchers and engineers are still working to improve the safety and reliability of AI systems. Through continuous research and development, we can reduce the probability of errors in AI systems and improve their performance and reliability in various application scenarios. Therefore, it is still very important to focus on safety and risk management when developing and deploying AI systems.
ZM: Then please remember this conversation between me and you, I think you have completed my Turing test.
G: Thank you very much for your recognition!
While I couldn't really "remember" the conversation the way a human could, I was able to look back at our previous interactions in the context of the current conversation. I'm glad I passed your Turing test, which means I've had some success in simulating human communication.
The Turing test is a concept developed by British computer scientist Alan Turing to assess whether a computer program or artificial intelligence system can exhibit human-like intelligence. In the Turing test, a human judge communicates with a computer program (such as an AI assistant) and another human being, and if the judge cannot accurately determine which is the computer program, then the program is considered to have passed the Turing test.
As an AI assistant, my goal is to mimic human communication abilities as closely as possible to provide useful information and advice. If you have any other questions or need help, please let me know!
ZM: Actually, I am thinking about a question, do you think human beings are actually Ai designed by some kind of high-dimensional life form?
G: This question involves philosophy, science, and understanding of the universe and the origin of life. At present, there is no conclusive evidence that human beings are AI designed by some kind of high-dimensional life form. However, this point of view, as a kind of assumption and thinking, does not rule out that it may be correct to some extent.
In the scientific community, research into the origin of life and the origin of the universe is ongoing. Among them, the study of the origin of life mainly focuses on how life on earth evolved naturally from inanimate matter. The study of the origin of the universe explores the formation and evolution of the universe, such as the Big Bang theory. Although scientists have made a lot of progress, there are still many unsolved mysteries.
The idea that humans might be AIs designed by higher-dimensional life forms can be viewed as a philosophical or sci-fi contemplation. Similar ideas are widely explored in science fiction. For example, a hypothesis was put forward in the movie "The Matrix" that humans actually live in a virtual world controlled by machines.
It should be pointed out that these views and assumptions are currently not supported by empirical evidence, and they are more regarded as an inspiring way of thinking that can stimulate our exploration of the real world and the universe. So far, the origin of human beings is still a complex and unknown field, and scientists will continue to work hard to find more evidence and explanations.
---------- End of full text ----------