Soft Testing Week 6 Assignment: Software Testing and Evaluation

1. Description of the plan

1. Product introduction

　　The task of this project is to test and evaluate two online learning platforms. The test product is BearingPoint platform, and the competing product is Xuetangxing. Both applications are mainly online learning websites. They are user-oriented and have very similar functions. They belong to competitive products and are very suitable for this comparative test work.

2. PSP table

PSP2.1	PSP stage	Estimated time (minutes)	Actual time (minutes)
Planning	plan	20	10
Estimate	Estimate how long the task will take	20	30
Development	develop	100	130
Analysis	demand analysis	30	10
Design Spec	Generate design documentation	10	10
Design Review	Design Review	30	30
Coding Standard	code specification	20	20
Design	specific design	20	20
Coding	specific code	30	10
Code Review	code review	50	10
Test	test	100	10
Reporting	Report	20	80
Test Report	testing report	30	40
Size Measurement	Computational workload	40	30
Postmortem	Summarize	10	10

2. Description of requirements

1. Functional module division diagram

BearingPoint platform:

School Online:

2. The functional modules that I am responsible for

As shown in the picture above, I am responsible for the module that tests the writing and submission of online assignments

3. Test description

1. Design ideas

　　The submission type of assignments can be divided into selection options, writing text, uploading files, and some assignments have a time limit for question and answer. The following methods can be used:

　　(1) Equivalence class division method: It mainly tests functions such as normal choice questions, writing homework answer texts, uploading homework files, deleting the last submission, and resubmitting homework.

　　(2) Boundary value analysis method: The main test is to submit directly without selecting an answer, write simple JS code to observe whether escaping is done, and whether there will be problems when uploading an overly large homework file.

　　(3) Scenario test: Test the function of the system according to the user's usage scenario.

2. Test execution process

Test requirements:

List of test cases:

Test execution interface:

1. BearingPoint:

2. School Online:

List of bugs found:

Export requirements:

Export the list of test cases:

Export the defect list:

test tools:

ZenTao test management tool of our group's choice

Download address: http://www.zentao.net

Fourth, the conclusion statement

In this test, the homework submission systems of the two websites were tested, and it was found that the homework submission systems of the two platforms did not have any problems in terms of functionality, but they had different defects in usability. The homework submission system is more intuitive, but each topic needs to be submitted separately, and unified submission is not supported. The homework submission system on the BearingPoint platform is not conspicuous when displaying homework, and it also requires one more click of the button when viewing grades. Overall, both platforms have their own strengths.

5. Job description

Through our group work, the divided modules have been determined. I am responsible for submitting the homework module and contributing 0.24 points in the group.