1. Team Name - SRC
Team members include: 3004 Chen Huiling; 3011 Chen Chunyan; 3019 He Yingyi
2. Team Project - Sixue Network - Online Question and Answer System
3. Opening report
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Purpose of writing
The preparation of this topic selection report is to establish the detailed requirements of the project, establish the function and performance of the project, and form a consistent understanding and confirmation with users, as the basis for further detailed software design.
3.1.2 Project Background
l Project name: Sixue Network - Online Question and Answer System
l The project is user-oriented: users who need to solve learning problems
l Project Development Team: 15 SRC Team of Guangdong Normal University of Technology
With the development of the Internet, users' demand for information continues to increase. Question-and-answer websites or communities are the channels to obtain accurate information. At present, the representative works in China include Baidu Know, Zhihu, Soso Wen, etc. Their user volume and access The amount of information is very large. However, this information is often mixed with a lot of meaningless information, and the quality of the answers is not guaranteed. However, the emergence of question answering systems has indeed solved many problems for users, and people are more and more inclined to Get information in the website's question and answer system.
The Q&A community is a relatively open platform. Users answer questions through the mode of comments, and their comments can meet the needs of other users and achieve the purpose of knowledge sharing, but these comments are not necessarily what the questioner needs, and sometimes a user’s answer It does not satisfy the questioner's doubts. Based on this, we design a question and answer website. Compared with the traditional question and answer website, we provide a function that the questioner can recommend multiple users to answer. fields, and other basic functions.
3.1.3 Project Description
Sixue.com is an online question and answer community where users share their knowledge, experiences and insights with each other. Users can solve their own confusion by raising topics on the website; they can publish their own study notes for netizens to refer to and learn; they can also comment and answer topics they are interested in. At the same time, the website will also recommend different topics or notes according to different user interests, and visitors can also see the more popular topics or articles recommended by the website.
3.1.4 Intended audience and reading recommendations
The topic selection report is mainly for project managers, developers, users, and testers to read. Each person can read it according to different needs.
3.1.5 References
l The Law of Construction (Third Edition) Zou Xin
3.2 Analysis of user needs
For learning websites, there are already many relatively formed websites, but none of them meet the needs of customers very well. In the process of learning using network resources, people often find that the functions of existing learning websites are mostly limited to shared resources and academic discussions. Moreover, when learners encounter problems in the learning process and want to seek help from relevant people in the industry, they often cannot solve them in time or get some relatively small results. In addition, most of this type of learning websites only have the function of assisting learning, and most websites have relatively simple functions, such as asking questions, only limited to Q&A, blogs mainly publish some articles, some may be for more professional articles, some Some may be more casual; there are other situations, for example, the teacher feels that it is very inconvenient to have no website where he can write questions in class, and every time he has to use someone else's website, and the questions given by others cannot be changed; For example, some of the answers from Baidu search are outdated or the answers you want cannot be found.
3.2.1 Questionnaire (User Survey)
In this survey, we collected a total of 100 valid samples. Through the analysis of the pros and cons of the same type of websites, we obtained the statistics of the number of users of some commonly used learning websites (Figure 2.1), as well as the user's evaluation of these websites (part of which is shown in Figure 2.2, Figure 2.1). Figure 2.3, Figure 2.4).
Question 1: When you encounter difficulties, which website do you often go to to find ways to solve the problem? (multiple choice)
Figure 2.1
Question 2: Apart from the website mentioned in the first question, have you heard or used other websites to solve the problem? Please give an example. (fill in the blank)
Figure 2.2
Question 3: What do you think is the inadequacy of the websites you use and solve problems? Please specify. (fill in the blank)
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
The results in Figure 2.1 are quite reasonable. Most people use Baidu more. Maybe the scope of our questionnaire is concentrated on students, Zhihu, and CNKI. For Figure 2.2, Figure 2.3, and Figure 2.4, most users feel that most of the websites have low information accuracy and cannot solve problems, or that other websites are more professional and may be difficult to read. The above results are similar to our analysis.
3.2.2 User Analysis
The following is aimed at our website mainly for 4 types of users:
l Due to difficulties or troubles in life or study, it is inconvenient to ask the people around you or those who are unable to provide satisfactory answers
l Learners who want to provide life experiences or share their learning experiences
l If you want to find topics or notes related to your interests, follow the authors of this type of article
l Bored and wandering viewers
Below we obtain the needs of each user by analyzing typical user scenarios:
User Scenario:
1. User A
| gender, age |
female, 16 |
| identity |
high school students |
| life, personality |
Knowledge is not very solid, you need to seek help online |
| user preference |
Hope that solves the problem raised |
| Typical scene |
I saw an answer on the website while searching for a question |
| Typical description |
This answer can solve her problem, you can continue to ask questions |
2. User B
| gender, age |
male, 23 |
| identity |
Social worker who just came out to work for a year |
| life, personality |
I like to share my learning experience |
| user preference |
Can come up with some high-quality dry goods |
| Typical scene |
Record your own learning process and share your learning experience in the process of learning |
| Typical description |
Hope it can help others |
3. User D
| gender, age |
male, 22 |
| identity |
graduating senior |
| life, personality |
Worried about the upcoming work and want to learn some work-related technologies |
| user preference |
You can find some experience related to the study of great gods, and can record study notes |
| Typical scene |
Found some relevant professionals to learn from him |
| Typical description |
God, can you take me in? |
4. Tourist C
| gender, age |
male, 18 |
| identity |
freshman studying |
| life, personality |
Enjoy browsing various learning websites |
| user preference |
curious about new things |
| Typical scene |
Came across the site while searching for some topic of interest |
| Typical description |
This article is well written, let's look at other |
3.2.3 Project innovation points and benefits (Approach and Benefit)
Innovation:
Based on some existing question answering systems, we have made some innovations and improvements:
1. After the user proposes a topic, they can select 5 recommended comments in the comments, and the system will push them to display.
2. The system calculates the area of expertise for the user according to the user's usage record and displays it (the user can turn off the display)
3. According to the user's use, the rating is divided. The higher the rating, the higher the credit of the user's comment.
Profit Analysis:
①This project can provide users with more useful information and reduce meaningless information as much as possible, thereby saving users time and obtaining more useful information.
②Provide a platform for users to discuss questions, not just provide an answer to users. This website not only pursues the number of registered users and the quantity of questions, but more importantly, the quality of the questions.
3.2.4 Market and Competition (Competitors)
market competition:
1 Scope:
①. All clearly existing competitors. Such as Zhihu, many people are using Zhihu now, so how can our newly developed website attract more users?
② Potential competitors that will appear. In today's world, with the rapid development of science and technology, more and more technologies are coming, and more and more websites will appear in the future.
2. Analysis of existing competitors: Take Zhihu as an example.
①其长期目标的分析，看其目前处境及未来发展方向。知乎主要产品包括：知乎社区、知乎日报App、读读日报App；同时，知乎还包括为激励用户和优质内容产生编辑制作的知乎周刊、知乎周刊 Plus、知乎·盐系列电子书、一小时系列电子书及出版物。2018年4月，知乎宣布即将上线曝光类的硬广产品品牌专区，在知识营销方面，知乎已经有包括品牌提问、原生文章、亲自答和 Live 特别现场等在内的产品。
②其现行战略目标。2018年，知乎宣布推出音频付费产品“知乎·读书会”，读书会产品于4月18日上线。另外，知乎宣布即将上线曝光类的硬广产品品牌专区，在知识营销方面，知乎已经有包括品牌提问、原生文章、亲自答和 Live 特别现场等在内的产品。通过增加各式各样的产品来吸引用户。
③其网站客户端的优势。知乎安卓客户端的发布，扩展了用户人群，适用于大多数安卓手机，版本较为稳定。安卓客户端还增加了网页版和ios版没有的新功能—随机看，用户触碰按钮，系统就会根据独特的算法为用户随机推荐一个意想不到的好回答。
④其面临的问题。随着不断开放和用户数增长，知乎面临的问题是怎样保证问答质量不下降，以及怎样扩展到IT领域之外更成建制的圈子。另外，传统问答网站随着Web 2.0的浪潮掀，起，依靠用户创造内容，但同时也产生了大量低质量甚至虚假的垃圾信息，从而使筛选和辨别信息成为使者的负担。
那么，要想我们的网站在市场上占有一定的份额，我们应该吸纳现有网站的一些优点，想方设法解决跟其他网站存在的共同问题。
4.比例权重
5.总结：
还没开始做的时候，一直觉得很简单，每个部分好像很很清楚，开始写文档和分析时候，才发现，有很多地方没有细化，才知道有很多事情要做的，但是这个是一个团队合作，分工下去后，每个人做一部分也能较快完成任务。
6.工作流程：
了解规格说明书及开题报告——组长分工——组员分别完成自己负责的模块——结束
7.团队分工：
陈春燕：搜集所需资料，画图，协助组长完成文档
何颖怡：原型设计，功能描述
陈慧玲（组长）：40%
陈春燕：30%
何颖怡：30%
9.选题报告评选表：
| 项目名称 |
|
小组编号 |
|
||||||||||
| 成员列表 |
组长 |
|
|||||||||||
| 组员 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| 分析（35） |
|
格式（10） |
|
内容（35） |
|
||||||||
| PPT（15） |
|
演讲（15） |
|
总分（100） |
|
||||||||
| 优点 |
|
||||||||||||
| 存在问题 |
|
||||||||||||
| 建议 |
|
||||||||||||
| 附加分 （非必填，若加分，需提供加分理由，最高加20分） |
附加分数（20） |
|
|||||||||||
| 加分理由 |
|||||||||||||
| 评 分 说 明 |
1. 评分采用百分制，满分100分，附加分20分。 2. 评分时要尊重他组，认真打分，要求实事求是，分数能真实反应报告质量，禁止一锅平端的情况。 3. 存在问题至善列出三点。 4. 附加分是提供给答辩质询中提问积极、问题有质量、或有特别惊喜的组，非必填内容，若加分，要写明加分理由。 |
||||||||||||