1: Research status has nothing to do with topic selection
This is a more common problem. For example, the A field has B, C sub-fields, etc. The thesis studies C, but the current research status writes B. In this case, either the subject is not worth studying or the author deliberately avoids the literature he refers to, the subject research is too cutting-edge, and the probability of filling in the gap is too low.
2: Poor organization
Many students' essays are unorganized and often consist of large paragraphs, making it very difficult to read. The small abstract of the paper is only one paragraph, and the conclusion is also one paragraph. It is very difficult to read. It requires the reviewers and judges to help it summarize the work. In fact, the paper is generally summarized into 3 articles, (1) (2) (3) not too much.
3: Many English translation problems
Chinese topics are often translated into sentences. The translation is inaccurate (it is recommended to translate the English that you have translated back to Chinese to see if it is the same). English expressions are generally put in front of important things, and Chinese are important things put in the back. Therefore, English expressions should be more passive. For example: the paper proposes a method, and the translation into English should correspond: a method is proposed in this thesis. (A method is proposed in this thesis.).
4: The questions are inconsistent
The title of the copyright page of the paper is not consistent with the title of the cover. This is the result of saving as a template. The papers of previous classmates were used as templates, but they were not completely revised. Some of them even had incorrect names of their supervisors.
This is a low-level error and should be the least likely to occur.
5: Thanks for insincere
My ** graduation project appeared in the acknowledgment. This should be a reference to some graduation design papers on the Internet (combined with the on-site application), and even the acknowledgment is referenced. This is too sloppy. It's actually a matter of attitude.
6: Thanks too "sincere"
Some students’ acknowledgments were full of “enthusiasm” and were written too exaggeratedly, complimenting their tutors a bit harshly. It is really scary to describe the instructor as "rigorous in academic studies, rich in learning, through ancient and modern". Looking at the content of the paper, the instructor must not be rigorous. There are obviously many small problems in the paper, which I didn't read or saw. The essay was poorly done, and the acknowledgment should be dedicated to a large number of people. There are not only teachers, parents, but also classmates and friends, and even give essays to girlfriends as gifts. (Is it appropriate to give a poorly done paper as a gift? To so many people, this is too big a blow?)
7: Frequent low-level errors
Some relatively low-level errors, such as inconsistent sentences in the thesis, incorrect data, typos, etc. often appear. Some students have very poor expression skills, and almost nothing is fluent. Some quoted data do not know what age (not indicated), which is inconsistent with the current situation. There are too many typos, the most can reach more than 10 per page.