Climb up today to talk to everyone about some common thinking misunderstandings.
I have been writing for three years, and occasionally encounter trolls. Friends who write around have also encountered this problem, and some of them are even hot searched. So why are these so-called "trolls" so rampant on the Internet? What is the usual "tool for committing crimes"? The "misunderstanding of logical thinking" we are talking about in this article is their "tool for committing crimes."
1、
Why talk about this topic? I personally think that it is very crucial especially in the Internet age. The development of the Internet allows us to express our opinions anytime, anywhere. It is a good thing to have an opinion, and Xiaolu strongly encourages everyone to express their own opinions, because in this way can we know whether their opinions are good or bad and whether they are established or not.
But pinch, some views are often maliciously attacked by others. It is also possible that in order to insist on one's own point of view and purpose, this kind of *** is unconscious, and we are used to calling this kind of person a spray.
But whether these are accidental or malicious, there are many misunderstandings in thinking and logic, and we are often easily misled and misled. Then the so-called " misunderstanding of logical thinking " is to use " wrong logic " to confuse you and make you fall into it.
Today, in Xiaolu’s establishment of a technical exchange group, something happened, which happened to be used as the material of this article to share with you some common thinking mistakes.
2、
The thing is like this, because the Fawn Technology Group does not allow all kinds of links from unknown sources and advertisements for things like pdd bargaining. But some people bargain for their own interests, I usually kick them out silently.
But Nepal, some group friends are impatient with these bargaining activities, and occasionally stand up to remind a few words, after all, everyone is here to learn, not all day to help bargain.
But the bargaining person, a little uncomfortable, began to personally confuse the group of friends, but some group friends couldn't stand it, so they retorted and started spraying. As the leader of the group, I was not "pulled down" together, but watched the comrade's performance quietly. In fact, in my opinion, what these people say are some misunderstandings of thinking, which led to the rebuttal of the group. .
3、
The following restore dialogue scenarios (any similarities are purely coincidental):
A certain bargaining applet was sent from the group.
Little A: "Brothers, cut it up, 2021 will go smoothly."
Group friends 1: "Dude, you are going to be sent a plane ticket."
Little A: "It's also a paddling group anyway."
chua～ chua～ chua～ sent three more bargaining applets to the group.
Group Friend 1: "Do you have any rules for posting this?"
Little A: "Seeing you bragging every day, I'm getting upset early"
Little A: "Does the learning group have a learning atmosphere? It has become a bragging group"
Group friends 2: "I'm a mouse shit and don't think the porridge is like porridge?"
Little A: "Goodbye, anyway, it's a group in the stagnant pool"
Group Friend 1: "So many living people, are you telling me stagnant water?"
Group Friends 3:...
Friends 4:...
......
Let's analyze several misunderstandings involved in the above.
4、
1) Change the topic
When the other party encounters an unanswerable question, they will use the method of changing the topic to avoid answering the question positively.
example:
Group of friends: "Do you have any rules for posting this?"
Little A: "Seeing you bragging every day, I'm getting upset early"
Xiaolu Note: When you ask questions about his behavior, he diverts your attention by changing the topic, so as to "personally ***" you.
2) Steal the concept
If someone puts forward point A, then the *** person does not refute A, but secretly replaces A with B, and then constantly refutes B's point of view (generally, B's point of view must be rebuttable wrong point), Make people around you think A's point of view is also wrong.
Group of friends: "I will work harder to enter the big factory"
Little A: "Just brag, people who brag can only use their mouths, who can't brag"
Fawn's Note: When you put forward a point of effort to learn technology, the gangster will change what you say to brag, and "work hard to learn technology" is stolenly replaced with "bragger". Bragging is a derogatory term. Through constant refutation of "boasting", it is proved that "working hard to learn technology" is wrong.
3) Partial generalization
Use a few and individual examples to represent the overall performance and use this method to support your own views.
example:
Group friends: "This is a learning group"
Little A: "Does the learning group have a learning atmosphere? It has become a bragging group"
Xiaolu Note: He personally thinks that the special case of no atmosphere is used to draw the conclusion that others have no learning atmosphere.
A person who "braggers" in a group assumes that everyone (370+ people in the group) is bragging, and concludes that it is a "bringer group".
I use a case to represent the whole to support my own point of view. However, the case mentioned is not necessarily correct. It may be a conclusion drawn by my own "sweeping concept".
4) Appeal to faith:
Support your point of view by giving yourself more confidence.
example:
Little A: "Goodbye, anyway, it's a group in the stagnant pool"
Xiaolu Note: The *** person himself strengthens his point of view by increasing his confidence, even if his point of view is wrong.
summary
In addition, there are many misunderstandings not listed, and the common ones are the above. If you have a chance to encounter good cases in the future, share them again.
The purpose of sharing is to recognize these misunderstandings of thinking and avoid getting into them. If you want to avoid entering into them, you must have "critical thinking."
Critical thinking is divided into "strong critical thinking" and "weak critical thinking". Weak critical thinking is to think and demonstrate the opinions of others, while strong critical thinking is to demonstrate and reflect on one's own opinions. Of the two, it is still difficult to have strong critical thinking. After all, it is to refute yourself, because this is not in line with a person's normal thinking habits.
So don't panic when encountering a spray in the future, and don't rush to refute it. Stop and think about these misunderstandings shared by Xiaolu, whether it fits one of them.
To summarize a common routine used by Internet sprayers: Although my IQ is not as good as yours, I will pull your IQ to be the same as mine, and then follow my method to take the opportunity to defeat you.