Depth articles - Target Detection History (a) with respect to the classical target detection

Skip to main content

Returns the directory object detection history

Next: Depth articles - History of target detection (ii)  elaborate R-CNN target detection

 

Directory Contents

Depth articles - Target Detection History (a)  with respect to the classical target detection

Depth articles - History of target detection (ii)  elaborate R-CNN target detection

Depth articles - Target Detection History (c)   elaborate SPP-Net Target Detection

Depth articles - target detection history (four)  elaborate Fast R-CNN from the target detection Faster R-CNN

Depth articles - Target Detection History (five)  elaborate SSD target detection

Depth articles - Target Detection History (vi)  elaborate YOLO-V3 target detection

Depth articles - target detection history (seven)  elaborate YOLO-V3 object code detection of the Detailed

Depth articles - Target Detection History (eight)  elaborate CornerNet-Lite Target Detection

 

Papers Address:

 

In this section, the detection of Classical target, the next section target detection elaborate R-CNN

 

A. Classical object detection

1. the first part: the training set configuration

   (1) Negative sample

      ①. Selective search methods using the fusion region

      ②. Calculated coincidence between the bounding boxes for each region and the region labeled ground truth, if the coincidence degree between the region A and the ground truth of between 20% to 50%, and A and any other already generated a negative sample coincidence is not greater than 70%, then a is adopted as the negative samples.

   (2) The positive sample

       Ground truth is, those areas marked by hand as a positive sample.

2. Part II: extracting features of each positive / negative samples

    HOG features + bag-of-words characteristics, while increasing auxiliary SIFT, two color SIFT, Extended opponent SIFT, RGB-SIFT features four such features to add dimensions to a staggering 360,000.

3. Part III: SVM classifier training.

4. Part IV: feedback False Positive (false positive cases)

    These "False Positive" collected, SVM training just to get the right value as its initial weights, on the secondary SVM training, classification accuracy of SVM through secondary training in general there will be some improvement.

The testing process

   (1) First method with selective search candidate area on the test image obtained

   (2) then extracted feature vector of each area

   (3). Bake trained SVM soft classification

   (4). These regions are sorted according to the probability value

   (5). The probability value is less than 0.5 area removed

   (6) For those values ​​of probability greater than 0.5, the calculation of the degree of overlap between the IOU and each region scores higher than its area, if the degree of overlap is greater than 30%, put the removed area (non-maximum value inhibition).

   (7) The last remaining area as a target area.

 

 

                  

 

Skip to main content

Returns the directory object detection history

Next: Depth articles - History of target detection (ii)  elaborate R-CNN target detection

Published 63 original articles · won praise 16 · views 5976

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/qq_38299170/article/details/104470608