I close inspection systems where the group is the development team. Our group is mainly to do such a thing: the goods out of the project and other business information, such as installed on the project platform to achieve the transfer of goods in and out of the number of weighing the data to a unified platform for various business presentation and follow-up business.
2018, I entered the team, is the status of the project: license plate recognition performed when the platform scales weighing the effect is very bad, the general license plate recognition accuracy rate of less than 30%, often Barrier vehicle left the weighbridge during off on the wrong ( Barrier pole smashed therefore many), there is a problem with the car, on a car weighing data results are recorded onto the next one weighing data. Overall, the system in front of my entry, although there is mounting on the project, but the effect is very poor, unattended overall business basically can not run. At that time several sites installed our system, others are using our software make it look good (because the site leader commanded installation), these surface mount our software projects, but in fact they used the original way to proceed transceiver and settlement of materials - ----- because at that time our system simply can not achieve substantially accurate shipping and receiving data record, but can not use the data collected by our system to make the settlement and material suppliers.
Just joined the company, I was just now leader of my colleagues, and later promoted him up the personnel changes (he wrote back a promotion article) I became a team leader. I was into this company I know the company very serious gang, the biggest is the "new eggs to help" all the items a little basic positions are all new egg background. Zhang also basic annual salary of the new eggs to help.
So, I went into the complaints of various software issues a project team are busy dealing with various online every day. Soon a software bug feedback to me :( Background: Our software is installed on client projects, software and some system settings when we are serialized saved to a local file) customer complaint after exiting the software can not be activated again . Later, after investigation and know the sequence of the configuration file is opened in the local open white text (although the file size is not zero).
I then reported the matter to the group, then get opposition group: the test did not test such a case, the line should not have this situation (both online because of this reason the software can not be started, and said test not detected this bug- and this time I felt vaguely into the pit). Later, I received the same feedback line a few times, I summarized the law of the emergence of this bug, and then find a test, and finally reproduce the problem on a test computer. At this time there is a project leader recognized the bug exists. Then do not let me go to modify this bug.
According to my own experience, we modified the code to save this local configuration. From this blank configuration problems and have not appeared before.
I believe we are like me, I feel it is very simple, very reasonable. I thought it would end this way.
After I recently put forward the idea want to exit the company, team responsibilities phone when I mentioned this matter: because that code is written by the team leader, and he thinks that part of the code of good quality can not be wrong, but I went to move his code. Had an impact on him. So after I changed the code to this until I leave, this person work never gave me a good face to see, but is quite disrespectful speech. Even if he do this to me, and I did not conflict I told myself: I'm a little bigger than him, and I want to mature, sensible, vocational some of those do not worry, as long as the project is running well on the bin down.
I remember after that there are more impressed thing: I wrote an interface available to him to use. After I finished sending the work the group address of the interface, the interface documents to him, and I said something incidentally interface parameters and the meaning of the relevant line of business. The man flew in the group, said: "I know myself to see the document, do not need you here BB, so much the individual, how work will not ..." At that time my heart is a fire, but he ignored or the spirit of that sentence: I'm older than him little freshman, I did not need to fire him.
As it describes me and his contradictory causes. Unfortunately, ignorance of my departure to know these things offend him. Later, do not give me all kinds of work smoothly.
Later went on to describe. . .