English papers published the necessary dry! SCI contribute seven classic stages mail template, please take

Submission to foreign journals, and scientific research papers published a ring unavoidable, but the contribution of each stage of the e-mail in English how you would write it? Because the error message is not standardized or absurd, really a lot today, little fun into your rejected manuscript prepared for all kinds of foreign periodicals in English contributor seven stages of e-mail templates, SSCI, SCI journals and other foreign contributors may experience It is accepted, and quickly covered up for a rainy day!

One, first post Coverletter

Dear Editors:

We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

In this work, we evaluated ...... (briefly introduce innovative papers) .I hope this paper is suitable for "Journal Name".

The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:

1)Name A E-mail: ××××@××××

2)Name B E-mail: ××××@××××

We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have anyqueries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: @ ×××× ××××

Second, the letter Cuigao

Dear Prof. ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”.(ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers ornot?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some ofyour time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Best regards!

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: @ ×××× ××××

Third, the revised Cover letter

Dear Dr / Prof .. (write articles editor responsible for your name, it is respect, because the first submission do not know the editor in charge, you can only use generic Editors):

On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us anopportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”.(ID: 文章稿号).

We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: @ ×××× ××××

Fourth, the revised answer the reviewers' comments

(Most important part)

List of Responses

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号).Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Reviewer #1:

1. Response to comment: (...... A summary of the views ......)

Response:××××××

2. Response to comment: (...... A summary of the views ......)

Response:××××××

. . . . . . Comments one by one to answer, should certainly not have missed

There are following problems for several different manners can be suitably used with the term:

We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...

We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...

It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……

We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.

We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion

As Reviewer suggested that……

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……

Finally, specially to thank the reviewers' comments:

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Reviewer #2:

With the above

Reviewer#3:

××××××

Other changes:

1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……”were corrected as “…………”

2.Line 107, “……” was added

3. Line 129,“……” was deleted

××××××

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Fifth, thank you

(Article could be considered after receiving thanks or edit articles editor)

Dear Prof. ××××××:

Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: @ ×××× ××××

Sixth, ask proofreading letters

(If the article is accepted after a long time)

Dear ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive theproof of our manuscript from you?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: @ ×××× ××××

VII, article proofreading letters

(If the article is accepted after a long time)

Dear ×××:

Dear Mr. ×××:

Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID:文章稿号)for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below.

Corrections:

1. In ****** should be **** (Page ***, Rightcolumn, line***)

2. In **** the “*****” should be“****” (Page ****, Right column, line****)

Answers for “author queries”:

1. *********************.

2.**********************

3. **********************

We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: @ ×××× ××××

Source: Adapted from wooden insect forum;

Author: duan1987

Past recommended dry (Mengchuo blue text reading below)

For a free English papers grammar, spelling, word error correction software installation package, concerned about the number of public interest in the chemical, send "Syntax error correction" need "taught you how to use EndNote X9" pdf graphic tutorial, the focus of interest in chemistry, reply to "learning endnote X9", we recommend copying the "learning endnote X9" send. Free download required documents artifact SCI-HUB client sends a "client literature artifact"

Published 74 original articles · won praise 337 · Views 1.3 million +

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/kebu12345678/article/details/104721723