· Law is not just punishment, not just iron, the law is a kind of human intelligence.
• Some legal course not, even hateful, but if they can therefore be free to mock the law, then everyone could find an excuse to evade the constraints of the law, leading to social chaos.
For man can not escape the fate of the arrangements for the world, but you can choose your own behavior to choose from that better legal order.
· Everyone says, the advantage is that it has the legal stability and clarity. But many people do not realize that it is precisely the advantages of its shortcomings, precisely because of its stability, not flip-flop, so the special circumstances can not be adjusted at any time; precisely because of its clarity, not ambiguity, so are situations where you have not met before, it is difficult to flexibly disposal. But man's wisdom can be adaptable and flexible at the break. In the case above, assuming no law in the next, Parker only their wisdom to settle a lawsuit, it may not embarrassing the problem. If we add the Master's self-conscious, then the rule of law not as good as it can be said that the rule of man?
• Some Westerners think, if a person's actions do not affect the freedom of others, then he should enjoy the right of this behavior. Furthermore, it was thought that when the interests of the majority is not enough sufficient reason to deny individual behavior, individuals have the right; but not difficult to imagine, just as minority views can sometimes become the majority opinion as minority right sometimes become rights of the majority. All in all, most people's likes and dislikes does not seem as the only basis for legislation of individual rights.
· The purpose of the law is fair, not in the law itself, therefore, when the law can not achieve justice, justice itself is beyond judgment in accordance with the law.
· The law is not top-down but bottom-up; it is based mainly in people's initiative to accept, rather than being forced to obey.
· Economy in contradiction with fair benefits, the law must address the eternal theme but difficult to solve.
· The law can not claim the moral approbation of things should be done, but can only ask how to meet the requirements of the law; morality is "high demand", the law is "low demand", demanding something be hazy "aesthetic" and the low demand things you must be entirely different.