I feel my personal experience writing mainly due to the following three points:
1, during the two-year study in the United States, at least every semester to be on a liberal arts classes, wrote a lot of writing, so more features English and clear writing.
2, childhood like reading, Chinese writing on well written. GRE writing personal feeling is to see ideas, unlike the TOEFL will be able to take a template 29. Mixed wrote out every thing is different, so also pay more attention to heritage. Own personal feeling good liberal arts foundation, by analogy.
3. Readiness Review written issue and argue each five to ensure that he will not time out, make sure you know about the kinds of questions and user interface.
Hello everyone, really a special honor today so many people listen to me nonsense. This is one of the words I, we Kou jump to listen to. Let's discuss a problem
Please allow me to nagging two gossip. Since we speak out of eight children, and will be responsible for their own people say things. I have to let everyone clear my personal experience, then say something precautions. Sorry.
I experience: studying in the US for two years, on a number of liberal arts classes, wrote some writing. University played two years of debate. I prefer reading. No more special or particular experiences are helpful to my writing.
I achievement: Writing 5.0 write basic issue has 900 words. Argue700 word around.
Note: Since I rely mainly on base, not how to practice writing, not to say the writing on the g great deal of research. So my approach is not as high this time and authority, I hope discretion. In addition, each person different experience for my method, you may need to adjust. The last is, because I have not practiced a wide range of writing g, I do not know what high frequency that there is no template, so you want to discuss high and the template, sorry, the next helpless. Since today you compliment to listen to my nagging, I will speak without reserve. We are hoping to help. Finally, there are problems I finished our discussion.
Let me talk issue, say argue.
Issue：
I have five points to say: structure, logic, words, sentences, thoughts
structure:
My personal structure are generally five sections. + + Launched at the beginning of the end of the three sections of sublimation.
logic:
I think the logic is mainly in the middle of three sections. Just the beginning of what is cited problem, what state table. I will mention the specific operation in the words inside. I think the key is to sublimate the end of it. The discussion down a level. Unless the time is not enough, then I feel the end is best not to rewrite the beginning, or the head of discussion concise summary. Read the article who IQ is enough to remember what we said before, do not end reminder. I am a Chinese American liberal arts teacher said that Chinese people should put their usual writing English writing at the end as at the beginning, because at the end we Chinese are generally concludes the paper. The English habit outset concludes the paper, write out the full context, as we read easily. And at the end, it is trying to increase their discussion to a high degree, or open a new topic, a new question and so on. The latter may apply to academic papers. But it rose to a high degree of recognition applies to G. This point will be mentioned at the thought.
Speaking of the middle three sections of logic, I generally have two options. One is to support three arguments, is AAA form. One is support for a two concession is AAB form. Here elaborate on my understanding.
Encounter a topic, we generally have two reactions. One is: Oh, that's too makes sense / nonsense too. One is: This also scores discussion. The former applies to AAA. The latter is AAB.
AAA is the three sections are in support of or opposition to all topics. The AAA also divided into two types. One is tied, one is progressive. If the relationship is too strong for three reasons nothing to write at least a tie out. For example, the topic that technological development has brought a lot of social problems. We Yipaitaitui, said that too right! Then write three parallel demonstration. Let me talk about the beginning, including all aspects of society, such as daily life, ah, ah ethics, interpersonal ah. Then came a parallel AAA. 1, technology can bring problems in daily life, such as environmental pollution, traffic jams, noise about her. 2, the ethical and moral aspects, such as cloning, cosmetic, degeneration, casual. 3, in interpersonal relationships, such as computer games and television reduces our face to face communication, finally out of a table games Three killed, kill net result came out, taking advantage of the opportunity to kill a beautiful girl understanding and less like. This is the three parallel relationship, because nothing so much from each other. But the parallel is a logical ah, but is the most simple logic. The good grasp, but not high-end.
High-end point is progression of AAA. For example, I practiced a topic, the government reported that the media, the more, the greater welfare of society. Yipaitaitui I say, too wrong! Then write three progressive argument. 1, if it is a totalitarian government, media coverage of what is decided by the government, are not reported Fengdiao, then no amount reported is useless, because the government is loved by voice. 2, even with monitoring departments to ensure that independent media can report the government (progressive concessions layer), if the level of education of the masses is not enough, there is no ability to distinguish right from wrong, or the people do not care about politics, then more reports, but is excess information, the more may make the masses do not understand the status quo. 3, even if there is control department, then the level of education of the masses is enough discriminating, objective look at all the reports (progressive concessions floor), if the political groups as an opportunity to use the media to attack each other, to create public opinion, then this report more and more on social welfare but more damage. Recently saw a report that US political campaign budget, seventy to eighty percent with negative news in the above digging competitors, only 20% is used to let the voters know that the ruling principle and philosophy of his own party. So the competition becomes, not because I'm good and I choose, but because the other side is poor, you can only vote for me. Over time, the political parties are more concerned about public opinion overwhelm competitors, rather than the development of the national economy, the social welfare or worse. Above, AAA is the progressive case in point.
There is a relatively high-end, I used the exam, is of AAB. The better is that, a lot of questions are not black and white. Sometimes can think of two A, A can not think of a third, but think it might have a negative thought, why not write a negative in the last case, it seems thoughts thorough and comprehensive consideration, but also reflects the logic. The title of my exam experience is that social development is primarily driven by the challenge authority. I write 1, ah, think of the black civil rights movement. 2, ah, I think Buffett does not believe in market efficiency theory has been regarded as sacrosanct in the financial sector, and to find their own intrinsic value of the stock, the richest man in the end ah. 3, but ah, but if everyone is to challenge authority, identify problems, and no one to solve the problem how to do? So challenge authority can promote social development, but not the only motivation. It's like fried eggs, fried fried finished back positive. In fact, any topic Right extreme point is wrong, you may have noticed my B is the topic that extreme, extreme is not good to say critique it.
Word Count:
As the saying goes, if there is long, no words are short. I can come up with 900 characters, in addition to typing fast, and write English cooked, mainly something to say. (This may or rely usually read books, but also read US news Han, forced to use Chinese examples, but the United States can be a good example or examples of the United States. We like college entrance essay, comes to challenge authority, we may think of the May Fourth movement, then the stroke of a pen, a time when I was 90th anniversary party of party building, raw rice cooked rice, on the spot to win. Similarly, Americans see essay, I also prefer to see Martin Luther King and Rosa write Parks civil rights movement, rather than the Revolution or the Hundred Days Reform.) I basically read books required liberal arts courses, or courses in business school case discussed, apply very well. Well apply their knowledge. Words that point a lot of people will teach us opportunistic, such as back and forth Che Gulu said. But I think, if there is something to say, speak out, then just one example can be two to three hundred words. I write the examination that Buffett example, explain how financial market efficiency theory worship (efficient market hypothesis), market efficiency theory is a what, how Buffett nothing and see for yourself the balance sheet (balance sheet), look for the intrinsic value (intrinsic value) and then, when most of the brokers are staring at the big screen to see the price changes, Buffett only a calculator on the desk, then this man became the richest man, at the same time donate money for the benefit of society, the more important is the challenge to the authority of the financial doctrine, promote the financial and stock market valuation changes, and so on. Specific ideas will be in part discussed.
On the beginning of it here. It is cited at the beginning of the title, because the problem can lead copied, they are able to write while he is thinking. Then superficial say a few words. For example, I was at the beginning of the exam. A lot of people said that to challenge authority can promote social development. This sentence makes sense, because countless examples tell us that after the challenge authority, social problems can be found, in order to solve the problem, to develop. Because the authority is composed of people, people will inevitably make mistakes, so no one to challenge authority, then no one correction, that society will stagnate.
I write to you, basically copied, not mindless, later you can write while he is thinking. This time I have given, I have reservations about the attitude of support, that is, AAB, and I think the civil rights movement, and think of Warren Buffett. B but have not had time to think. Then the next statement, I wrote: For this issue, I agree, because sigh development of society, whether it is the macro-social change, or to cause a change in social discipline, there is a lot of challenge authority people brought up. Because authority is often the right person to master, such as government and law, resistance comes at a price of love, so not many people have the courage and the courage to resist. Because of this, it seems they are valuable, but also have the ability and insight and social development becomes easy.
Civil rights can then lead to the next stage. The above is my beginning.
Sentence:
There may be many people said to write in English, we have lost in the starting line up. Vocabulary dry, but the foreign devils, we will back him twenty or thirty famous, complete grammar pressure on them too. Then wait for them to flip every word, clause, written long as possible. My teacher told me, simple English is good English. Length not only error-prone, others are not easy to read. After all, writing is to convey ideas, unless the level is up, or want to write esoteric, poor imitation like a dog. And each examination room to write a difficult sentences have to think a long time, time is running short. I always think of what to write, logical structure and ideology-based, carrier sentence just logic and ideas. Of course, if all SVO that can not be justified. In fact, to the level of some expression naturally spend a long sentence. This is not a short span of time. After all, you test around the corner, I think, rather than sentences, logic and thinking to go to. As long as no mistakes are good English. One of the words.
thought:
It is said to have a few examples of universal test before G, or a few paragraphs back anecdote. Because I learned when studying a variety of classes, when the test mode can do immediately awaken slumbering memory, so there is no relevant preparations. Now not much time left, I have two tips to share: 1, put things into their own familiar fields pull. I'm an economist, so Buffett, and I belong to that part of the stock of the Bank, of course, have something to say. We think about it, challenge the authority of this thing, why not write it Galileo, two iron ball landed at the same time, the elementary school. My answer is, I'm not familiar, no words are short. So rather far-fetched to write a point of Buffett, then I have to have something longer, then finally said to him round. Another reason is that I will not fight Galileo Well!
2, think about it before, especially class topics and discussed segment (if there is a background study of words) read. I run for the United States before the data is read material on a marketing lesson. And once there is a thing about what analog establish priorities, and I put the Boston Consulting Group in business class to learn a company's matrix analysis method described again, also written very long. Anyway, you have something to say, then certainly go up words, thought has also been, and as long as these things can be related topic, then logic also. Issue This also almost the same. And finally talk about the end of sublimation, which is reflected in thought. The end of this certainty is personal. I think the top four written wonderful, basically the properly. End well written just icing on the cake, written as for the general never come to naught. So cautiously you can write a short point or dim point. In fact, the article written last, it was definitely a deeper understanding of the topic, so what did not have time to say, the end can raise questions, meaningful one. What's new discoveries, such as both sides of this topic are integral to it, it is inseparable Yeah, in short, there is something to speak out, you can talk about. Just do not say too vague, should arouse the reader will appreciate.
Now talk about Argue:
One said to Paul argue dispute issue, because argue more simple and easy to pull up the average. This time much of you is very meaningful. Argue I think it's really simple, because I played two years of college debate, to find logic errors are commonplace. Often six or seven hundred word article I criticized him enough, so I'm sorry, but could not say too much. Before starting the discussion, I would like to clarify a few points:
First, the teacher told me that we write this article, though, is to pick the wrong, but the article is not intended to split completely, authors concluded that a silly B. But to find ways to improve this article. So words, do not say that the article was wrong here. Which shows a lack of respect. Better to say, this article here wrong. If you say / do / so add a little something, the entire article will be more convincing.
Secondly, although I saw the teacher put each error are marked, what is wrong analogy, what is cause and effect inverted. But I finished the mold Gre official PPS, while reading out their essay, written not clear who the wrong category. But without exception, I wrote why is it wrong and how to change it. Therefore, it can be understood. For example, it was cold, we just need to tell him because you have a fever, runny nose so you sick (why is it wrong), you should drink plenty of water to rest (how would you change), but this is the specific influenza virus, influenza , it is not that we should be concerned about the. So I can not write, it does not matter. Lack of time, you can not back those terms. But probably know a few, it can also be helpful, such as false causal relationship, hasty generalization, problematic evidence, every one has the basic.
Argue I simply say three things: pick the wrong end of the beginning of the + + segment
Argue and the issue is not the same, have tracked the beginning of the end, this may be the only thing able to come up with a template. I always test when he is thinking while writing the beginning of the error. And other finished at the beginning, but also find all the errors. In general the beginning of this article indicate, because (original copy), so (the original), the authors then conclude that (sic). However, the authors demonstrate the time made some mistakes (a list can easily, such as lack of evidence), if we can pay attention to the following points, then this article can be more persuasive.
The end of it, but also not the same issue. We do not have to strive to sublimate, after all, not stand paper. They probably concluded that, because of a mistake made a mistake two and three errors, so the article is not attractive. If the author can do to improve the I, II and improvements to improve Third, then this article would be better. (Bugs and improvements are written before, so no brain copy, or proper face, write up on the line, word has also greatly.)
Picked the wrong: wrong pick how to pick it? Anyway, I feel, in addition to facts show that, for example, there is a city called A city, next to this sentence a city B, each sentence has a basic mistake. Because of this I debate, it is difficult to teach what is the secret. We may see a few questions to get a feel just fine. In the questioning attitude, every word doubt about it. And then not to imagine that he sprayed on the Internet and people. When sprayed on, the caller said, every word you can not wait to pound the table directly opposed. There is such momentum it. Note that whenever a sample survey appear, we must seize the fierce curse. Sample question, questioning the capacity, questioned the credibility, what can be questioned. In addition, whenever the emergence of analogy and causality, but also questioned. This we can only play it by ear. Culture is not logical to say one or two days, G test logic is very straightforward, generally find three is not a problem, it is impossible to see a few essay will understand.
Segment: how to put the middle three sections? I feel that the second paragraph must say the biggest problem. If this is not necessarily the full text of the biggest problems, but you feel the greatest. In most cases, most notably that wrong, but also you think the biggest mistake, that is the full text of the greatest wrong. It not does not matter. Because you feel the greatest wrong, you have something to say, then the second stage will be very full, basically can not go wrong, Words also pulled up, properly half. Some say it can write three paragraphs or progressive side by side, I feel a little difficult to write progressive, because almost all wrong, wrong even bother to demonstrate what more which less wrong. My habit, we may learn from it. One of the biggest mistake to write, and then I caught a good argument can think of a few words wrong. The remaining twelve can basically mention of fault, such as the lack of evidence, ah, ah other possibilities, and it is all to the third paragraph, started off by saying, in addition to the above two points, there are some details may note. Then just grab twenty-three talk, make up some. Finally, at the end also said there is an error of one or two errors, as well as details of the above-mentioned (problematic details mentioned above), if there is improved a little bit improved two points, on the little point.
There are many other, only we must attack the. This is not a short span of time. Members exam soon, remember what I said about the logical structure, specific criticism really gives on the line. As for your criticism of penetrating, critical or tasted. I feel mean to do. House to take up important. Furniture put Zeyang is followed.
Stop here, long-winded, you may also sleepy. He said he was honored to once again listen to me. Thank you!