Thirtieth chapter
Tao Zuo take charge, they do not want to strong military power in the world, being to good also. Division of residence, thorns grow wherever. After the army, there must be a bad year. If it's good, no strength to take Yan. Fruit and no arrogance, fruit Erwu boast, Frydman cutting fruit, fruit and forced ranking, is that the fruit but not strong. If that is not strong. Was strong and old, it is that the road does not have long track.
CHAPTER 30 1 tense international situation, to see how I was evaluated war
Dear friends Hello everyone, today we went to talk about "moral", we take a look at what I bring to us new wisdom. Today we begin a study into the third chapter ten, which is relatively fast, to the thirtieth chapter. In the thirtieth chapter, he talked about his military thinking, which is part of a very unique content in the "moral" in. I whole "moral" is written to enhance the training leader, but as a leader, particularly at the national level leader, you must understand the military. I thought the military are very different, we think that even at first glance I was not talking about military thinking, talking about what negative concessions.
For example, chapter thirty-first up, I would say, "Tao Zuo take charge, we do not want to strong military power in the world, being to good also." What do you mean? Road with his assistant to "take charge", "take charge" is the leader of meaning, everyone's leader, the country's leader. Road to the kind of benevolence with his assistant, the king, the leader of that country, he did not want to, "do not want", this silk manuscripts and B are "not to a strong military power in the world", the regular version is "not to a strong military power in the world" so look at this silk manuscripts a and B than the Tongxing Ben strong, because "in" word added later, indicating the position, the finger is very clear, "not to a strong military power in the world", but there are better versions - Guodian Chu Jane, this chapter in Guodian Slips yes.
Guodian Slips says "do not want to a strong military power in the world", "Desire" plus the word good, I think this is a more complete statement. Road to national leadership to his assistant, who such people "do not want", he does not think so, no such desire, there is no such idea, to use military force to "strong in the world", I rely on the rampant world are soldiers, that is not acceptable. Because "being to good also," military strategists back and forth on this fight this thing, "good" is likely to mean, "also" be repaid, meaning revenge. In other words, you win such a thing other people, but soon people want revenge, and returned to you. You temporarily win, you're really win? Not necessarily, could lead to disaster, so this military thing, you look at a temporary victory, you feel great, but people would like to have revenge, this is very easy to come back, which I was talking about.
I say what do you mean? "Tao Zuo take charge", supposedly the best soldiers strong, a country best players together to do, I "moral" in many places inside talked about, do not want a strong military, soldiers go weaker. We think this is a confused, a country is not the best players together is the blessing it? People would feel reliable? Why do you always talk about soldiers weaker it? I even said that military forces behind I can not retreat into inch ruler in front of me to move forward an inch will not work, I try to back foot, "My God, you can fight it?"
I thought of the military who see us from the point of view, if you are from a general point of view, you would think I write military thinking particularly useless, "This boy, not to a strong military power in the world, only soldiers weak well, this is what you do ah, then we fit the fight, ah, we defeated every day we go "from the general point of view this is absolutely incomprehensible. But I write not to see the generals "moral", it is a national leader to see. When national leaders take into consideration, we must not put soldiers in an important position, that is, not to war in an important position, because this thing is not a good thing, so we said how to see it?
For example, say the time at Wei Wei Wuhou, we know there Weiwu Cu, Wei Wuzu particular play, Wei Wucu the Warring States period is a powerful team, which is the creation of a powerhouse Qi, this particular crack play, his boss is Wei Wuhou is the monarch Wei.
Wei Wuhou once asked his minister Li Ke, he said one thing I'm curious, why is it that Wu perish? Rick answered him, which is very clever minister, said "the number of war and the number of wins," You see this answer, the king asked him why Wu would perish, he said, because the number of Wu war and the number of wins, each playing a total war We won the battle, not to listen to this confused, Wei Wuhou wonder, saying "the number of wins and the number of the war, the country's blessing." "Number of wins, the number of war", how many times the battle to fight, fight a lot, have won the fight, which is not the country of blessings Well, it dead, and this is what reason ah? "Why also?"
Rick to say, "the number of people tired of war," you this monarch good fight, I have not a strong soldier Well, I'm a good fight, I fight to win, continue to play, play more war, tired of the people You want to be able not tired yet? Constant conscription, which is "the number of people tired of war." "Number of wins, the main arrogance," How many times have won the battle to fight, this proud monarch began, "Ah, my generals can play, I can play this warrior, great, hit" start proud . Rick analysis of this situation, the "pride dictates tired people", is a sovereign country proud, proud sovereign country, to drive these tired people. "The country is not dead, the world is fresh men", which countries do not perish, this world is very rare. Is proud monarch increasingly, people getting tired, these two directions up and down hard, saying that the state does not die, how could it? After you have a arrogant, "pleases" is arbitrary mean, I arrogant, "pleases the very thing", you wanton, what I wanted to play, he wants to play to beat him, he wants to play I can win, so we "very thing", this "thing", all things used in the extreme, to use the time unusable.
"Tired of the blame," the people here, "tired of the blame, blame the extreme worry", after the extreme resentment, he wants every day how to do how to do, so Rick says, "all very up and down, Wu's death still too late "said the up and down have reached an extreme, go to both sides reached an extreme, which more and more arrogant boss, wherever, playing out every day, people getting tired, every day thinking about how to get rid of him, this time up and down went to the extreme, this Wu perish, I feel a little late, this is Rick answered. "So the king did commit suicide to dry then also," king did so because this was committing suicide, and suicide.
Rick answered very well, he put a country what kind of pattern will result if a strong military power later, to analyze very clearly, if you rely on these countries militarily powerful to run rampant in the world, then sooner or later you will perish. why? You will feel omnipotent, and this is what the cost of the war? War to consume at the expense of national strength.
You see the "Art of War" inside, "Art of War" is not about strategy, "The Art of War" in the "count" is not a strategy meant, not thirty-six, thirty-six it is a small operation, "Art of War" in the "count" is the calculated mean. "Art of War" came up to talk about the two countries to calculate, how to calculate the strength of both sides, to calculate road, heaven, earth, will, law these five areas, both sides of the strength in the end how much difference. Only I have the strength to win, and I did not dare this battle, do not fight.
"The Art of War" up the first calculation, the calculation of several entries - channel, day, to the, method. Word was that you have no national leaders to work for the people, for the people of the people, this is the road. "Art of War" in talking about the Road to France word, which is "moral" leaders speak inside the law; the sky is God, not toward the day to you; to be location, location to not toward you; then will and France, there is no powerful will, finally, how to how to use the art of war and so on. "Art of War" inside speaking very clearly, the first condition is that you have no moral leader, will win the support of the people, which is the biggest strength of the country.
I "moral" inside means that countries do not rely on soldiers to rampant the world, should be inspired by moral world, really want to fight, we must resort to is desperation time, called "saints had to use it" even I have to say that this victory over the funeral come and dispose of it, as a funeral to do, because to kill too many people, so people are kind of reluctant to do such a thing, it is I, "moral" military thought. After the country's strength, moral appeal everyone, so that we move closer to me, rather than soldiers rampant the world. If you rely on soldiers to rampant the world, not blessings countries. We talked about it, right? It is not such a thing? You look throughout history, no one can rely on a strong military power last lasting thing.
For example, Hitler, Hitler that soldiers are very strong, it may not be a blitzkrieg, who hit who say fight, quickly put people to occupy the country, often do the job, the result of rampant like a plague moment, but I talked about "being to good also, "everyone wants revenge come, when the people of the world to unite against him, and finally he suffered a crushing defeat, in the basement own their own point of a fire. So, all this arrogance by the military feel, feel that they can play, I dominate the world, whenever there is such an audacious ideas of the people, the final outcome are more miserable. I speak of is a law of nature, between human society we want to achieve harmony, we have to balance our moral appeal to the world, which is long-lasting, this is a military Laozi.
We heard later would ask, "Dr Lo, which I speak is the national leader, that we are small people learned that what inspired it? Here's what coaching wisdom of it?" Yes, a great side here wisdom, in the course of our life, in fact, our lives are filled with conflict, you can not be a harmony with everyone, I look like a smile with you all day, every day is very happy, it is impossible, there will be conflicting. In time of conflict, we have what attitude to face him, this is not the same. Some attitude is my strength, my strength, my bully you how, I will press you how? There are such people. Such results are really good people?
If we look at life, put this event into the course of life in perspective, then, that the conflict always want to reap strong person, often the outcome is not good, not happiness in his life, he always reap strong, you feel You really suppress the others go yet? You really bully bully others go yet? I see some older employees bully that new employees, "Then I'll bully you how, you listen to me now how ......" Do you think that you put him pressed down yet? I had seen many times, so a child being bullied, instant grow grow, eventually becoming department heads, that is your immediate superior, in my life experience, such a thing ever seen how many times you really think You put people to suppress it? I speak of "being to good also," this conflict that you rely on others to suppress violence, people give you feedback is also evil, so evil evil plus, you happy? And when your opposition to unite all the time, your life is not happy. The surface of the seemingly strong people, in fact, often the final outcome was not so good, I say this is the law.
How should I do? "Moral" Lane told, do not put this on the military front, a man you do not suppress others to the front, did not use, because you want to suppress others, people to resist, you suffer from conflict, you press others the more people the more resistance, the more you are not happy, so try to appeal mainly virtue. Put this conflict as a weapon of life, these people just do not take charge of Tao Zuo, people with a strong military power in the world is the same. He said, "Tao Zuo take charge," should "do not want to a strong military power in the world", should try to forget their own military forces, which is our powerful people in the conflict, try to forget it, but rather to highlight their own moral side, this I speak of is a thought.
Ladies and gentlemen, we did not thoroughly publicize this, because we are "moral" up chapter thirty-three talk about this, I use a lot of space behind him in terms of military thought, we can not elaborate on this three through, but I I thought of the first to tell you. I tell you that, from a general point of view, a strong military, OK? Well, speaking from the perspective of the monarch, a strong military, OK? I answer was not good. This point of view is completely different, so from the leader, the monarch's point of view, "moral", that we can truly understand what I write, it is I, "moral" secret.
Today let's talk to this, we are then concerned, I "moral" military thinking on our lives in the end what kind of inspiring tomorrow.
XXXI 2 Collapse heart of the battle now! That in fact is the "beast"
Dear friends Hello everyone, today we went to talk about "moral", I look at what kind of wisdom has brought us. Yesterday I asked everyone I talk to, "moral", classical day period, we did not trouble trouble? I think we shout out, everyone says "No trouble, no trouble, caused me to read classical interest." I felt very happy to see this message, because this classical, old Chinese can not be broken, and we are relying on the contents of a lot of classical Chinese culture to heritage, Chinese people do not know classical, and classical can not read, basically to cut off a lot of cultural content, it is very unfortunate, so we understand some classical, classical slowly familiar, familiar with the classics is a good thing. I chat "moral" different place, because I am ready to go in, sometimes live sound is like the point, and sometimes echo, really sorry. No matter how hard the conditions, no matter how changes in the environment, we continue to adhere to chat for a "moral" every day, so we chatted a little bit of progress, I progress with everyone.
Today chat thirty-one chapter, I talked about earlier said "soldiers who ominous also, they had to use it.", He said today "for the attack on Tian, not beauty, if beauty is killing the music also. Fuller frustrated murder can not carry on in the world. "What does that mean? First look at the different versions of "Tian to attack on" all versions are written "tranquil upper", you now have to write Tongxing Ben "is on the tranquil," Kawamoto such as these are written, this Heshang Gong, Wang Bi this and many more.
"Tranquil as the" tranquil nothingness is on, do not kill zàn the United States, so to speak is also possible. But this Mawangdui silk manuscripts A and B of this and Guodian Slips dug out and saw people write is not "indifferent to the" written "Tian to attack on", "Tian" word is not tranquil Tian, is gold placed next to a tongue of the tongue, which read the word "tian" (three times), also read "gua", also read "xian", we say that this side should read "tian" (three times). "Tian hit for the" What do you mean? "Xian" What does it mean? "Tian" word is very clear, talking about the sharp weapons, weapons are sharp degree. "Hit" when what say? You want to attack "hit" when what say? "Hit" sudden, hidden to attack, "hit" the word refers to the terms of cover. "Hit" the word we have now do not understand the intention, and the intention is to give the deceased to wear clothes, clothes to wear later on refers to the multi-layer, to add a layer of clothes called "hit." From "Tian attack" is the word I would see the stroke is very powerful, he give this as a sharp weapon like wearing the same clothes the dead to wrap it up, is what it means, but also with color, which the clothes are dead, you see I writing very powerful.
"Tian hit for the" What do you mean? You put sharp weapons to take cover on the cloth gave it, do not come up, we go hide arms, showed the weapons to do nothing, which is a long time to put that weapon if not, this is good, this is the best policy, do not zàn the kind of war the United States, it is the intention of this sentence. Not "into the tranquil, not beauty," which repeated the baseless assertion, we dug in Guo Dian Chu silk manuscripts A and B to this and then, before we talk about a lot of "moral", understanding is wrong. Again, I say this is the kind of sharp weapon to take on a cloth to cover it, do not go out, to be covered, not to weapons that are really brilliant strategy. Do not zàn that the US act of war, to fight acts, to attack human behavior, do not zàn US force.
I say "if the United States, the music is also murder", if you zàn kind of force the United States, a show of force, showing off weapons, in front of this "not beauty," say is this sharp weapon, talking about this is "Tian "means, do not zàn the United States that a sharp weapon, the United States and if you zàn it, that you are willing to kill. This willing to kill, give it a qualitative, I said, "Fuller frustrated murder can not carry on in the world." Qualitative powerful words, saying that people feel murderous, can not "frustrated in the world", the leader can not do . Why do you say so, if you have heard me speak in front of "moral", you should know of.
I do not advocate the use of force to solve the problem, because I believe that the development themselves, and strive to do their basic work, which is the main part of real life, the conflict is only a small part of the way you can solve the problem without conflict, calling to Germany is best if it is to die, to go with a weapon, but you know when the weapons will be used at the same time to destroy the enemy, and he is damaged, it will Haoshang their strength. So I said it was "a last resort," the. As a leader, do not think force is the first, I would like to force you to see how strong my soldiers ah, such a person "can not be frustrated in the world", if he does the leader, will be a big problem . I followed this with another What do you mean? We again today to deeper analyze this issue.
In fact in the course of human evolutionary development, there are two main human behavior: one is to build their own homes, like me farming, animal husbandry me, I bear children, etc., which is an important human behavior, part; the other is to kill each other levy, crusade, is that you kind of farming well, I got you something stolen, I went to invade your tribe, your tribe killed, I take it over your food, this is Another behavior. These two acts in the course of human evolution, there has been. As of today you see the changes in the world still exists, it is the nature of animals, including gorillas.
That day I was watching TV "Animal World" play gorilla, that is two groups of gorillas, a group of gorillas pick bananas every day own their own training children, a good life; another gorilla all villains, like all bachelor Like, they come together on the looting everywhere, so he began to encroach good home life partner that gorilla, came to their woods grab fruit picking, playing the home and so on, these villains are finally ruined, He ran, but their intrusion led to gorillas died there a few.
In the gorilla behavior when its life into two, these two acts which are the main it? They must build their own homes, livestock, pig, chicken, what a variety of animal raising, farming, and so this is important. If all went looting, there is no race to the looting of all, the world will finally deserted. I grab your grab is over, I would also grabbed a constantly rob, finally like a plague, did not eat last, because after rush finished eating, and not to race, so in the course of human development , this looting is always like a plague will arise, but soon returned to this calm, to build their own state of life. This side which acts accounted for the major, mainstream kind of behavior is it? With the leader of the group has a very important relationship. If Murder-based, like the looting of people when the leader, it would be bad to the main tone of this group, will end up like the plague everyone erosion site, but in the end will die out, because unsustainable, not fight always, this is the two main lines of human development.
I profoundly pointed out, we must give priority to the construction of their own infrastructure, the kind of willing to kill "not frustrated in the world", he can not do a tribal leader, speaking very clearly. Development of human history is the way give you an example, say that Hitler, Hitler his mind is Murder heavy, he said the country together is to go looting, he became a national leader after he began around crusade , attack, fight people, like a plague of development, but the development of his country that he did not have to develop the economy, he immediately materials collected, to lay a country, so he was in these two lines inside, he is to kill Lord's. Such people "frustrated in the world," and he became a leader it is broken, there is no construction. So the Second World War, the whole of human history to pull backwards many years, because all destroyed, all destroyed the industrial base, human life is snatched away all the resources, the people's living standard back, a lot of people homeless You can go, so this person "can not be frustrated in the world", which I was early in the "moral" pointed out in deep thought.
You see the "moral" That simple, "Tian attack is on, not beauty, if beauty is killing the music also. Fuller frustrated murder can not carry on in the world." We see "This is right, too simple." , people talking about the importance of rule of human development, in which I speak out, you pointed out here. The two lines you want to re-kill, you can not develop a society which, like a plague temporarily excited, after a barren, so I talked about "division of residence, thorns grow wherever," thorns are out, so I in a very profound.
In our life, is not it? the same. For example, in the company inside the company's department heads and the company's main leaders, if it is a fun killing people, the bad, we say "our leadership is not abnormal, not murder," I said that to kill, not murder, It is the battle to kill the heart. Some leaders have a battle of the heart, for example, some department heads, he would seriously encourage everyone, let everyone do good; heart some leadership struggle is very heavy, he thought not in production, he turned their minds on the whole people, is divided into several back and forth to your school. I first got A, ask "how recent performance of B to expose you to look, how he was, I could not understand this little B for him, you talk about how this kind of B". A then began to say "B is particularly bad, you see how how he was." He said you go back, and got him to B, and asked him "A man like .A how this man is not very good, do not you see, I think this man is not how to, you talk about him cuss. " The results of his company into several departments inside the school, so that we fight. He felt sure I'll fight you balance, which I can control the situation, so I will let you fight, that leadership is leadership to kill, so leadership is very scary.
You want to know that we Everyone has good and bad on both sides, have a fair, serious to work, the other side is to kill the kind of animal nature, but this leadership will you kill animals exposed the nature of the battle, the worry about their work to hide that side, so such a leadership came to power, he became a director, when after leading departments, the bad, and this sector is certainly a mess, the last fight of people suffering anxiety, which is "to kill Fuller not frustrated in the world "means.
Fundamentally, this is the lack of moral leadership, kindness is not enough to kill too heavy, if he became department heads, when the company's leadership, the company will train up the entire beast, the beast is not a good thing, not to say Foreign how how, but the brutal infighting, the result of human evil slowly be inspired, this was devoid of good, so that our organization would not progress. I in 2000 years ago, "moral" to speak out in such a rule, so "for the attack on Tian, not beauty, if beauty is killing the music also. Fuller frustrated murder can not carry on in the world," which It is the "moral" the true meaning of this sentence.
Dear friends you think this is great wisdom, our own life are not necessarily aware of their analysis, we live there are two lines, one is stable in life, the other is fighting. I tell you out, fighting to hide that side, to try to suppress it, do not use it, try to develop lives of their own good, this is great wisdom. In particular, leaders in law, it is very important, ordinary people may not be so important, you may not feel, but for the leaders concerned, this statement is simply too important, this wisdom is very important character, this is what we learn "moral" harvest.
Today let's talk to this, we talk to you next week to see if I then bring us what kind of inspired, give us what kind of wisdom.
XXXI 3 recent war-thinking, but and I have anything to do?
Dear friends Hello everyone, today we went to talk about "moral" and see what I bring us wisdom. In the past two days inside, weekends our editors published a letter from several listeners, I looked very happy, because I do to help people. You say that people live this life view of what is it? Make everyone happy, make you fruitful, feel meaningful, that this very happy, so we'll talk then.
Then today, in terms of "moral" Chapter XI. I speak in front of the "Xian to attack on the United States not to" sharp weapons to take it on the cover, to seal hide it, you do not praise weapons, this place is said very clearly, I do not say praise weapons. "After the passage of Xian for the" version comes out, than the "tranquil as the" Our Tongxing Ben better, "tranquil for the" meaning good, but definitely not the father of the original.
He went on to say, "if the United States, the music is also murder." You have to praise this weapon, you are willing to kill. "Fuller frustrated murder can not carry on in the world," such a person that he can not "frustrated in the world", made him leadership is not enough. I then say, "Kat is still something left, the funeral is still right," was the courtesy to do when Kichiji wedding of a man standing on the left, row on the left. Do a sad funeral, when do you want to go to the right row, to stand on the right, there is a distinction about this. We speak in front of the ancients that the left is a yang, yin to the right, the left is the sun rose, the right is overcast fall, so there is a method such arrangement.
Then I say, "is Pianjiang Jun on the left and on the general right of abode" was very interesting courtesy, military discharge station when the size of the row when the official station, under normal circumstances would have left is auspicious, the right to be unlucky the left is auspicious thing, the right is the funeral, but when the troops station row, the greater the officer to the right station. "Pianjiang Jun" He does what instructions Fa, he is now the equivalent of deputy director to shoot the film, the director said "on", said deputy director horn Canada "on", this is the deputy director. The director said, "Well, stop," assistant director on the "stop", his command is issued on top, he just convey down, which is equivalent to "Pianjiang Jun", he is not responsible for decisions of the war, many people kill him regardless, he is the messenger, so that in the lower execution, so low "Pianjiang Jun" status. Low-status people to stand platoon in the army, he was on the left. "The general", decide the fate of the war, the number of people killed in the war, he stood on the right side, the kind of funeral positions, so I said, "is Pianjiang Jun on the left and on the general right of abode", which was the etiquette. "Introduction to the funeral ranks also," that this ranking troops to fight the way, is completely in accordance with the way the funeral arrangement, so the "Introduction to the funeral home of it."
I then say "kill all the places of weeping sorrow", when these words mean to say if the war to kill more, including this murder to kill the other person, but also kill their own people, because Kill a thousand, since loss of eight hundred, you kill a thousand enemies, they themselves would lose eight hundred people, because you want to cut with a knife. When the war killed more after the murder, although you beat, but also "weep with sorrow the" sad state should take him to cry, feel hurt beings, hurt life, this thing is not a good thing, "weep with sorrow of. "
Then I say, "in order to overcome at the funeral," that is, even if you beat, you do celebration, we now say "beat, won, celebrate, celebrate", truly virtuous people to know that I beat virtue inadequate, not to let the other party by virtue ownership or submissive, and so on, I rely on to compete to solve problems, to solve the problem by war, the result killed so many people, so to come to the funeral to do this thing, is to do with the celebration of the funeral this model to do, to do things in such a state of mind to go.
Here XXXI on all over. What does this chapter behind these words? According to the funeral to say the whole fight do these words mean? I still tell you that dispute, the dispute by force, the conflict is a last resort used only with the later you want to know because of my lack of virtue, I did not do the preliminary work, but it finally used the conflict. I tell you that the idea is to try not to use the conflict, not to use force to resolve, we must first do their own, to enhance their strength, the moral improvement, rely on these real strength to resolve the conflict, and it has really no way go with war, conflict, which is Laozi.
This idea, which we may not have heard of a few paragraphs before interest, we think, "This is useful with my life in it? Is there any relationship?" This has far-reaching effects, and I told the front between the countries. A good deal of our country, our country, and so often condemned, often with a variety of diplomatic channels to resolve, some people say, "how can we be so weak." This is a big country style, this is really not a joke, I think our national leaders is to understand the "moral". Just cause conflicts, disputes, real play, costs are great, we rely on virtue, on the strength enhancement for people to move closer to you, which is really supposed to do. Really pushed to the head, pushed it a last resort, a fight no problem. For example, Vietnam Strikes Back, battle in exchange for peace, and this is the fight, but we must know that we will eventually have to develop their own economy, enhance national strength is the right way. This is a national level.
I also talked about the company level, try not to rely on conflict resolution, we have not talked about at the household level. You know how important it is at the household level virtues that conflicts often lead to unnecessary damage.
I just see a news, I also forwarded, Beijing Wildlife Park, a place to see tigers are tigers, beast area can be traveling by car, you drive yourself into it, to go themselves to visit. There are people with a family of three children, a husband, a wife, plus the wife's mother, together with the children, drove inside to see the tiger. The results drove because I do not know what happened, who do not know how it happened, the young couple got into a fight, they fight bitterly. You say there is no fundamental quarrel between husband and wife do? Nothing at all to do, that is, who did not wash the dishes, did not wash chopsticks, who is wearing good clothes ...... trivial things. The results got into a fight, incredible, upgrade, furious lady opened the door to get off, opened the door to her husband, the husband should be exposed beast area, I did not expect that in the next Tiger lurking, a look at "Whoops this woman get off, "tiger jump it up, give these women an ran off. Old wife's mother in the car and saw "this amazing girl I was walking the tiger bite, my God," which is really real mother, would save car doors down, another result up a tiger killed her , and then to also ran off. This man is said to want to save down, a look to die and press Enter to go, because there are children in the car. The woman is now seriously injured, dead or alive, on this matter, the dispute on this point, resulting in his mother died, and his whereabouts are still unknown.
You can say there is anything in the wake Tigers garden even dare to get off, dare to face the tiger, this is absolutely trivial matters, she gave birth to the heart of hatred, anger made her lose control of her in the end forgotten in Where. Face surrounded by a tiger, a tiger up so bulky, giant fangs teeth, you can stop this? So I say that family disputes are often played on trivial things, little things really big on the principle cause, but on this smallest of matters, such as who did not wash the dishes, educate their children Naju Hua said lighter, which saying heavy and so on, on this small, multi you do some work, he at least do some work, these things lead to the final result will not be afraid even to face the tiger, the tiger was to eat, this is definitely a result of small lose big.
I actually talked, we talked about the front, there are two parts in life: main, main content is to have a good life, the essence of building a good life, which is part of the contents of this building; the other part is a little marginal conflict, your the scope and others a little conflict, there is no good coordination, which accounts for life is less than 5%, 1% of the content, but if you can not read the entire whole, you are the 1%, 2% as a whole, and all day long with people fighting, and forget our own life is to have a good day, resulting in a sharp decline in quality of life.
You see this because a couple of small things, led to so much tragedy occurs, such a thing can be found everywhere in life. For example, TV inside, I often see the kind of program, I fear to see the kind of program is two or three children because the parents a house to court, debate on television inside, this old man, old lady look innocent sitting there, three sons battle it out on the edge, "just who owns the house who should who should, who should who owns that, how I was raised, how you raised, in my 21 days, to that you only 20 days. " To be honest, I saw this program, I do not know what it's like my heart, my life, I hate this thing, is this because of property disputes that, as the parents of the dog to criticize, to look at, I think this completely understand what life in the end yes. You say you give your 10 house, you died that day 10 this house that you can take it? You can take away? Impossible, can not take a set, but left after three generations of the house that you do not know where to go, you run into a spendthrift, every day Chihepiaodu, 100 house gave you lost light, no , the property of someone else.
Such people are totally did not see the "Where all the phases are all false," the truth, the house, everything is temporary only, we are only temporary, because you how a house divided, in fact, before and after should not be bad 100,000, 200,000 of things, the results of brothers and sisters become enemies, the content of the day nothing else, the family met on a bucket, is fighting, go home with their husband and wife discuss how I fight with my brother, with my sister is fighting ...... I say you how much fate you born man inside in millions of years, then became sisters, as brothers, this is how much fate. This result is used to fight your fate, you are not it a shame? I do not understand it completely.
Parents so much kindness, a little brought you, the parents have given your big kindness, and take you from a baby to raise your adult, your long skill that you fight with their parents, I think I totally incomprehensible I really can not understand, I saw this thing I'm dizzy, I say that the person how to think, I think you should have the ability to provide two sets of parents house, which is that you have a skill. To your parents, brothers and sisters to the house, who pay would a little, who points a little less, a little not quite right area, you will battle it your all to the kindness of parents polishing, and even told parents become enemies, I do not recognize you, your parents really gone one day, you will not regret it? Such a person does not regret. Parents are not really that day, you want to see again all meet again, you curse.
Why is this so? Because he lives the conflict as a whole, they should forget the essence of life to improve, you have the ability to make good work, good life, happier, more money that you earn a house, you give parents, father or his mother , so that parents live in a big house, and that much good. This is petty, but also to grab their own lives miserable, you feel yourself to be happy? Such people think themselves up night air could not sleep, because his eyes staring at that conflict, so such a person is not happy.
This is I tell our thoughts, our life is the main focus should be placed on building, conflict is one of the very, very small part of the construction can be used, with the strength to lift, inspire us with virtue, achieve harmony, it is the highest level. It is to die, have a conflict, but conflict is the last resort used to be very sad, very sad run out, because what we regard to the point where it? So this is the life I give our wisdom, our lives should be to concentrate on the construction of, not because of a little skirmish, it is considered all the world, put all the energy on that go up, then you life will not be happy.
This is the wisdom we have to learn, and later we learned this wisdom, your home slowly defuse the conflict on the city, nothing serious, we all have to live together before fate, was born relatives, we should cherish this fate, our happy life time is not enough, you got the time to put the whole life is full of conflicts, disputes, which is completely wrong. Understand this truth then, our life will be a lot of happiness, which is I want to tell us the truth.
My friends, we talk today this, tomorrow and then to share with you "moral", I look at what has brought us great wisdom, well, we'll see you tomorrow, thank you.