REVIEW: In general, a lot of technical personnel in the interview process will have such a link that will ask you a lot of technical problems, or give the interviewer a puzzle to you, let you put this puzzle them out. But in the process of solving technical problems, there may be the interviewer a "trap" that the company normally does not require people just happen to have this problem, we need to find someone to help solve it.
Recently seen on such a workplace forum posts: project encountered technical problems, leading me to release the recruitment needs of employees taking solutions, I did not follow suit, the result of 15 days Mongolia! This is how it happened?
The employee said the original project to progress their own half of the time, how there is a technical problem can not be resolved, even if the leadership can not do anything. Later leadership wanted a way, he asked me to post some direct recruitment needs, write high treatment on recruitment. Direct leadership not to say you really recruit people, but taking those seekers of solutions on it.
I was thinking we are not easy to work, it did not follow the required leadership to recruit. Of course, the project can not be delayed, own painstaking research for 15 days, finally solved the technical problems.
But leaders complained I slow down the progress of the project, my attitude obviously not as good as in the past, it is estimated think I do not listen. The employees are now hesitation, we really have to do anything to Hunde Hao it?
Seen from the post out of the leadership he did not realize that their approach is wrong, hard to interview people, not to help you solve problems. Just because you are in a different position, this way too much of it. Empathy, if the leadership is taking the program to others, your heart think? Instead, the staff is very good, things have a bottom line, principles. So users is how to say it?
There are friends that I have encountered the same problem, leading me taking fake recruitment program, I did not do it, then the project Huang, of course, I was led dismissed. Despite this, but I still think it is worth, at least decent conscience above.
There are friends say you resign it, so too did the leadership of the pattern. In addition, leaders should be punished for doing fishes can be said that employees of plagiarism results. But some people say that leadership is still a little means, though not very honorable thing.
In this regard, how do you see it? Welcome to write a review