1 group face Profile
1.1 What side is the group?
Group is, we face a troublesome leaderless group discussion interview, basic graduating students to go a little bit of well-known enterprises to participate in the candidates, the interview will encounter this form. Generally 5 to 10 person team conducted a limited time to discuss the topic, draw conclusions and statements.
1.2 What are jobs that require group faces?
General non-technical jobs need to participate in a group of post surface.
1.3 What group of surface inspection?
Mainly on the surface population of your organizational skills, communication skills, logical thinking ability and other soft power, it sounds deceptively simple technology than those of single-sided, it is not. Face uncertainties facing the group is very large, you might show the beginning of the design is completely different with you, if you come across a wonderful teammate, maybe you are the team finished; you may not like the idea of the whole group; you may not get the opportunity to show (the average person will be able to say twelve minutes) ???
2 groups face role
2.1 Leader: frame-makers and Remediator
Responsibilities : surface group leader, who presides over the group overall surface of the process, need to arrange for team roles when necessary.
Requirements : gas field, logic, summarized, layout decisions
Evaluation : either win pretty or ugly dead
Factor :
Risk factor: ★★★★★
Opportunity factor: ★★★★★
2.2 Timer: Process controller
Responsibilities : Responsible arranged according to the total time of the interview panel discussion rhythm, not just the timing of it must be strict control of stray students; easy to miss due attention to discuss the results of the discussion; easy transition to the Leader; if a panel discussion timeout, then Timer dead probability close to 100%, if the discussion results also OK, the great hope.
Requirements : strong personality, the gas field, the concept of time, the ability to quickly take notes
Evaluation : I personally believe is relatively safe a role, but also easy transition to the Leader
Factor :
Risk factor: ★★★
Opportunity factor: ★★★★
2.3 Recorder: documenting human group discussion
Responsibilities : Responsible for recording the results of the panel discussion, on shorthand skills and logical thinking demanding
Requirements : shorthand skills, logical thinking
Evaluation : The record may not join group discussions; easily converted into Reporter, but in opening statements, if miss the message, mortality rate is almost 100%.
Factor :
Risk factor: ★★★★
Opportunity factor: ★★★★
2.4 Reporter: panel discussion presenters results
Responsibilities : the bigger picture to be outstanding, able to grasp the context of group discussions in a short time; Requirements: confident, logical thinking, bigger picture
Evaluation : When required logical thinking clearly stated point of view, if the confusion, easy death
Factor :
Risk factor: ★★★★★
Opportunity factor: ★★★★★
2.5 Member: other team members
Responsibilities : Strictly speaking, each member is a need to put forward constructive views, and let the interviewer noticed that you are the author of this view;
Requirements : innovative thinking, summarized, logical thinking
Evaluation : Do not talk nonsense, did not say if the focus is a waste of time and opportunity, the next would like to say, difficult
Factor :
Risk factor: ★★★★★
Opportunity factor: ★★★★
Based on the above yields:
(1) the most cost-effective role: Timer
(2) Leader and Reporter risky, it is also a great opportunity
(3) Recorder and Reporter, Timer and easy conversion Leader Role
3 Questions
3.1 Priority discussion
Topic Introduction
This topic is generally cite an extreme case, give some options, but only a few select or sort, group discussions conclusions are given.
Examples of topics
(1) Last Huawei's participation in the group face: when sorting keyword analysis graduating students choice of employment, to give some options (salary, location, firm size, business reputation, etc.)
(2) in a plane crash on a desert island, only seven people to survive: pregnant women, students, scientists, athletes, pilots, elderly, writers, only a hot air balloon can be planted a person, ask how you choose?
Essay way
(1) carefully examine the question: must, every word pull, as the title, the more important is the "desert island, a hot air balloon," easy to get application scenarios, to help sort out ideas.
(2) Keywords Category:
a) that Huawei's title: Keywords can be divided into short-term development needs and long-term development needs of two categories, then sorting analysis
b) aircraft that question: the chances of survival can be classified according to whether or not there is also the ability to save others Category
Discussion thread
[] Brainstorming stage to collect everyone's views (shorthand skills is important):
(1) If the opinions of others and they are not the same, do not interrupt
(2) If everyone in agreement, then quickly through this point to discuss the next point
[Stage] Statement Summary
(1) If there is controversy, then you come across a wonderful work. . . leader or the timer to stop, decision-making, "this point a more consistent view of us, please note the time", most people will be sensible. (If it not be sensible, really Oh, and he shouted reservations)
(2) if they are not reporter, pay attention to his thinking before things, there is nothing to supplement the results of the fight after the reporter statement is completed, additional remarks, fight for their chance to break through.
Precautions
(1) Do not argue disagreement, to preserve harmony discussion group
(2) Do not split the group discussions, this is very detrimental, because it will increase the cost of the group form a unified opinion
(3) If the two groups fight, we need to quickly record each other's remarks, and quickly come up with the difference between the two
(4) also have scratch paper ideas, the interviewer will look
Word ideas
Moderation -> sub-categories -> organize your thoughts -> reasons
3.2 Resource Allocation category
Topic Introduction
Variations priority discussion, but also to a number of options for priority evaluation, but involves specific resource analysis, will lead to many changes, it singled out the discussion.
Examples of topics
(1) now pushing a new game, the top set aside a sum of money, then nine departments want to fight for the money, you will make money given to the three most important sectors. 9 sectors including market research, planning, technology, art, testing, operation ...
(2) Unit (foreign) financial constraints, is now only 20 million things to do are the following:
a) call the office to solve the problem difficult.
b) furnished conference room to meet the large conference hall and other higher-level units entrusted contractor.
c) pay the high cost of medical workers.
d) fifty-one send some benefits for their employees.
Clearly 200,000 yuan can not do these four things are successful, if you are the leaders in charge of this unit, how to make
Use the money.
Essay way
(1) moderation, to determine the focus of the subject, such as games, money
(2) lists the results of their own, given its own priority (5 star, 4 star ???)
(3) to collect your views, shorthand
(4) To interest to the interviewer, but may present some novel rational point of view, even if ultimately rejected, it does not matter
Discussion thread
(1) analyze the problem from different perspectives, such as the angle of the game,
(2) If the interviewer to make further allocation ratio, listed in priority , theory and implementation, priorities selected to achieve (the art of planning a lot of Dragon, farmers do not have enough code, still not developed a good product)
(3) The interviewer will often linked to practical difficulties, such as programmers dissatisfied
Precautions
(1) may review each person in the group stated in the interview, be sure each person's role
(2) there must be a scratch paper ideas, the interviewer will look
Word ideas
Moderation -> Keywords circle -> sort out their views -> prioritize -> want to defend
3.3 Class scenarios
Topic Introduction
Gives a general situation or topic, design a solution
Examples of topics
(1) If you are a CC voice product manager, please design a promotion of
(2) gives four people, my father (office), mother (classes, entertainment), uncle (retired, tired of the traditional entertainment) and sister (90 trendy people), each of a different age, different sex, different lifestyles Please design a satisfying family life of mobile solutions (limited platform, APP, etc.)
Essay way
(1) carefully examine the topic: Determine scenarios
a) Location: determining event background
b) People: determining the target user
c) Requirements: determination scheme direction
(2) propose a solution class, may be generally divided into two basic discussion throughout this discussion modules: carrier + Content
a) a carrier: determining the display format program, internet (note Information Mobile Internet hotspot)
b) Content: program content, if there is no way to discuss before the team formed a unified conclusion, the task may be staging process, classifies the target to the recent more easily achieved and the recent difficult to achieve, within the group to ease the contradiction
Discussion thread
[Brainstorming stage]
(1) After determining the keywords will be discussed in the framework of their lists, and like a good reason
(2) collecting the results of discussion lists results framework, and the logical concatenation
[Stage] Statement
(1) If the presenter is: the whole process according to the logic frame, with the previously discussed (say time segment), a panel discussion outcome presentation
(2) If the presenter is: according to their results, try to find the reporter did not say the perfect place for supplement
Precautions
(1) easy to get this kind of topic ideas, but we often scrambled to express their thoughts, chaotic scene easily, but this time is the best time to grab the leader. Offered to the general direction of the discussion, it is easier to become leader (conscious enough gas field of children's shoes, or do not try to mess leader, really dangerous)
(2) members of disagreement, do not make a contradiction, to try to convince, shelve disputes, leader and timer interrupt other people to have courage.
Word ideas
Moderation -> determined that the scene requires -> Real-time summary, converging Center -> shelving -> forming a frame
3.4 Opening and debate class
Topic Introduction
A description is given very vague, broad casual working, required to give choices or schemes
Examples of topics
(1) How to make fire home easier
(2) the ability and opportunity are two very important factors in the success of the road, some people think that the success of the road capacity is more important, some people think that the road to success is more important opportunity, please give your answer, if only a tendency to choose items, which one would you choose? And list at least five reasons for you to support this choice.
Essay way
Such topics at first glance it is difficult to immediately have ideas, accumulated a very rigors of everyday people. Such as home fire that question, if you can think of family things, a lot of the ideas will be clear, therefore, are the product of child paper, or the like to collect a lot of knowledge of it!
Precautions
Ideal landing: This topic is very open, children's shoes are easy ideas when thinking, recommended to the ideological ground, to find some ideas, not far away from us
Word ideas
Moderation -> OK Scene -> divergent thinking (try to link Internet-related) -> collect views -> Organize logical framework
3.5 Role-playing
Topic Introduction
Type the title story, gives a contradictory situation, we asked to discuss a choice, try to make cake and eat it.
Examples of topics
Suppose you are the Coca-Cola company's sales, the company now send you to remote areas destroyed a truck expired bread (not deadly, destructive to health). On the way to travel, just met a group of hungry refugees blocked the road, because they believed that you were sitting in the truck's something to eat. At this time, reporters have to report refugee movements just came. For the refugees, they will certainly have to solve the problem of hunger; For reporters, he is to report the facts; salesman for you, you are to destroy bread. Now we must ask you to solve the problem of hunger refugees, let them eat these expired bread (not deadly, destructive to health), in order to destroy them bread, but also let reporters to report the fact expired bread? I ask you how to deal with? Description: The bread is not fatal. You can not bribe reporters. Not damage the company's image.
Essay way
Such problems are generally given a situation seemingly dilemma, and the purpose is to try cake and eat it, to see such a topic often no way to start
(1) Moderation: Circle keywords, such as expired bread, Coca-Cola, etc.
(2) determine contradictions:
Life refugees a) hungry
b) expired bread, though not fatal, but the press conference reported that the impact on business reputation
(3) determine contradictory priorities: human life
(4) propose a solution:
a) Option 1: explain to reporters and refugee situations, indicating bread expired, with the company reflect the situation, sending a group of over bread
b) Option 2: If the refugees can not wait, it would save the people first, follow-up maintenance of public relations
Precautions
(1) the purpose of such practice is most directly conflicts, often human impact, this time should keep a clear mind, one of the highest moral priority
(2) may be more than one scheme, put forward two options, make choices and explain, to ease the conflict
Word ideas
Moderation -> OK contradictory sides -> moral priority to improve the party -> proposed several solutions to ease the conflict
Tip 1: Contradictions priority (moral human> interest reputation)
Tip 2: multiple solutions to ease the conflict
4 essay summary
4.1 How to read the title
Extracting location -> determine the background
People -> to determine the target user
Requirements -> determined direction
4.2 has positioned itself
According to the topic and their own circumstances, to determine their own roles
If you are the subject of their own good, for when the leader, if no one initiative as leader, to have the courage and the courage to lead us forward.
If the subject is not good, for when the timer, relatively safe, but pay attention to the timing.
4.3 How to fix
Someone jumped the role I want, how to solve?
Leader: Most people will not jump directly, they have to take the initiative to fight; if anyone jump, I believe his strength, not contentious; the next best thing as a timer, or a reporter.
Timer: If someone should come out first when the timer, then it does not matter, first guidelines can not afford conflict; timer can help determine the time of discussion.
Recorder: Whether can when recorder, need to record the results of the discussion group, able to seize the initiative in question.
Reporter: If it is not, then the fight supplement after the statement is complete, there must highlight, comb logic.
5 pre-fight role
5.1 grab Leader
Initiative in principle , if we did not move, it is offered as a leader;
Subtle : The best way is to start from the discussion, based on performance so that the crew recognized as the de facto leader, is also easy when the reporter.
Confusion: take the initiative to play and lead the way, after the statement must admit that he is domineering leader
Grab Timer 5.2
With easy to grab a watch timer, increasing the chance to grab
If you do not grab, it does not matter, but also reduce the risk (discussed in overtime, timer will hang). Assist timer determines the timing of the discussion, and always concerned about the time.
Grab Recorder 5.3
Personally I do not want to rob the initiative, because the larger the risk, return is not high. But we must record the results of the discussion, and have a logical, results from several groups face of view, often not worth Recorder Recorder.
5.4 grab Reporter
Risks and opportunities, recording the whole thing relatively easily by everyone elected, but also introduce ourselves, but easily lead to a bad impression on the interviewer's crew and, therefore, the first and so we elected, it is not only to introduce ourselves to the people.
6 medium-term exchange
6.1 Principles
(1) team harmony is the first goal
(2) discuss the structural framework must first set out, or discuss easily confused, without direction
(3) must always be discussed with the bear theme, and people have the courage to deviate from the direction of the pull-back, but not too strong (easily lead to objectionable), with a ladder frame is easy to ease the conflict
6.2 Leader
(1) Responsibilities: Always make sure the panel discussion on the main line, control panel discussion direction
(2) the role: If already a leader, pay attention to listen to your views, and organize in their own notes, integrated into the inner frame; if not the leader, will have to always follow the rhythm leader, put forward constructive suggestions.
(3) If the leader not the ability, to achieve timely assistance, the gas field is not enough time, pay attention to help control the market leader
6.3 Timer
(1) real-time discussion note, so there is room for maneuver
(2) was wandering attention back to
6.4 Recorder
(1) regardless of who is the Recorder, have their own records, and maintain logical
(2) Note that on a regular basis (more frequently) to summarize the panel discussion, so as not to miss some key points
6.5 strong teammates treat
(1) If the leader, followed by keeping the main line comb, put forward constructive ideas
(2) If so wonderful, and as a leader to dare to break back to the discussion; if the other team members, tactful prompts the other main discussion deviation
6.6 treat vulnerable teammates
(1) If the leader, must find a way to get as many people involved, the role and content are; dedication to listen to everyone say, especially vulnerable people, he usually does not speak, but really wait any longer to speak out often is the essence
(2) if not leader, then I do not have control ???
7 late ending
7.1 Leader
Select team members served as reporter, as if no one initiative, it needs its own top leader, so the leader we also have to record the results of the whole discussion.
7.2 Timer
A timely reminder of the discussion is about to end, we ended brainstorming prompt, enter the results summary
7.3 Reporter
Combination recorder outcome of the entire framework for the discussion to sort out, and rehearsed statements within the group; In opening statements, adding the timing of the whole discussion, let the interviewer feel that we discuss very organized, using the total - points - overall presentation logic, the beginning and end turned a deaf ear needs, example:
Interviewer Hello, here I will on behalf of our members, to your final statement of the views of our group. (Total plays) After discussion, we sort of are: university professors, students, managers, school teachers, school principals, surgeon, general, and finally the athletes. According to your time, we made the following arrangements: (discuss timing) four minutes of standard-setting, 10-minute discussion of classification, and finally one minute to determine the answer. In the standard-setting context, the views of members of the group is not much difference, we will be "the extent of the contribution to society" as the most important criteria.
(End summary once again)
7.4 Member
Reservations, listen carefully to express reporter, active supplement, but Yaoyan Zhi justified.
8 Crisis
8.1 discuss first principles - teamwork
Discussion process, we must bear in mind the sense of team, if not to express opinions, may be temporarily retained as a follow-supplement; if as a leader, be sure to bring out their forces, responded to the silence of people's views, they are easy to draw. At the same time, not too strong, easily lead to objectionable
8.2 grab the leader, how do?
If the leader has the ability to be, it always follows the rhythm of the leader, followed by leader set the framework for discussion and brainstorming main line
If the leader not the ability, it has boldly offered to discuss themes and framework, and help to keep the discussion thread leader, but not overwhelming, so their contribution to
8.3 grab timer, how do?
Need to always pay attention to the discussion time, you can ask timer directly if necessary. Such as rhythm control can reduce the risk of those who, even if the final project overtime, your risk is lower than the timer
8.4 grab reporter, how to do?
Pay attention to listen to his statement, if insufficient, the active supplement; if logic is not clear, take the initiative to supplement the project logical framework; if not inadequate, you can make some of your own insights (careful, more dangerous)
8.5 Both teams happen debate, how do?
As a leader, need to quickly get together to appease another, record appease the views of that side, so that transition as smooth as possible.
If it were not leader, and when the leader unmoved, remind each other in accordance with the leader of the main line of a given discussion, not deviation. (Feeling is to take the leader as a shield)
8.6 groups chaos, how do?
Calm down, will discuss the results of combing, set the framework, if a leader, must be served, promptly suspend chaotic discussion, and arrange recorder records your way of thinking, according to the general direction of the judge decided to discuss. If it were not leader, but also decisive suspend the debate, but not too strong leader scenes.
8.7 discussion bifurcation, or someone division team, how to do?
Panel discussion emphasized the goal, and the team moved out of the theory, most people will understand; met wonderful, leader appease.
8.8 not get it, how to do?
Innovative ideas, be sure to find a gap to make statements; no innovative ideas, constantly sum up the outcome of our discussions, during the presentation, may make their views
8.9 challenge by the interviewer, how do?
Decisive fight, seize the main line, to answer questions based on the results of discussions everyone; interviewer often did not talk much to discuss in person before the challenge will be to find, at this time, other little friends to be ready, if the interviewer is not satisfied, then immediately on top, we must fight in the end, the interviewer challenges if they are successful, the discussion before all in vain.