Step 1, the recording phase, try to record the next day you think you have learned, understood the thing, these are your potential progress.
Step 2 content, the review stage, timely periodic review on the progress recorded in this by constantly redo, reproduce, mark, until remember, until not forget, until understand, you will feel at ease in progress .
Step 3, the application and testing phase, the self-test, test, discuss, teach others, or apply the contents of the record of this in practical work, your progress with the objective of testing and marking.
1. title as the core, to thoroughly master the knowledge through problems. Because the practice is the sole criterion for testing truth, just to understand some of the theorem is not enough and must be improved proficiency by topic. Moreover, we are almost normal IQ, has the ability admitted to Tsinghua or Peking University, after all, high school do not test intelligence, proficiency test.
2. To master the principles for the purpose. When you learn to do a knowledge or a question, feel not quite understand it wrong, you have to figure out the principle, but also in the form of related topics by. As long as there is a wrong or do not know where, it is necessary to organize, if only in a choice of an option do not understand, you can not copy the whole problem, just as the knowledge that is not a copy can. I found that learning related to many factors, it is important metacognitive ability, and then to explore this day.
3. Summary. Summarize the core subject knowledge, why is it wrong, how to do this here, put difficulty write in their own language.
4. Review. Review all day, but to redo the inside of the subject. Not to see, is redone. As for the review to determine their own time.
About my implementation steps :( feeling pretty good)
Take biology textbooks, I first read the entire textbook, established the overall concept of knowledge points (this is very important, reason Mangrenmoxiang know everything, right). Then began to brush fifty-three.
Fifty-three personal feeling much better than Wang Houxiong and the whole solution, complementary knowledge and explanation are good but also true problem (which I recommend relatively little difficulty appropriate). "Teaching on demand" on the fifth and three "method of inquiry" in the two plates have a lot of extremely valuable, I finished a sort of progress on this, before doing problems, can put two plates of knowledge copying in progress on this (it feels good copy, as the case may be), then do the problem.
Done a subject began to organize, to copy the title (if you can cut, but my fifty-three already left but a shell), then write down the resolution, and then sum up the core of the difficulties and points, they are written on, complete a. It's that simple, nothing complicated theories do not.
Although specific steps teachers nuclear fusion progress of this application did not say in the article, in fact, he has expressed very clear.
The rest is reviewed. Note finishing efficiency.
Since then, I no longer lectures, finishing just keep this progress, half of the day can finish school textbooks, review a few days to master, but also to engage in active thinking.
Results 100 did not fall on the subject of 90 minutes.
Probably the case, the high school knowledge, no how powerful logic and intelligence, to see the proficiency and diligence.
Party of mutual encouragement