Really not Xiangman, even if you have had a year to learn programming, there is a certain time code training, has completed a number of independent programming, C and C ++ test scores are more than 80 minutes for me, the programming of the road, very confused.
Programming in the end is what? To be honest, I do not really understand this, I'm just a freshman passive acceptance of the teacher's knowledge, conformist to practice. Although the topic did come out, but, to be honest, I did not get to know. I will apply an existing template, maybe I will use this period of knowledge, will use the knowledge that period, however, when there is a problem different from the template I used to use the time when the problem requires more than one of the main points of knowledge , but two, three, or even one time, my mind just would cout << "the What shoule the I do?" << endl; . Yes, I still do not understand programming.
After re-read Mr. Zhou Aimin's "Road to Jane," I seem to understand something, I seem to understand the nature of the programming point, Mr. Zhou's book is very good, after reading, I understand, the road seemingly programming difficult, in fact, Road to Jane!
For the group has not yet been entered into the company's program is not for me, I communicate with the first chapter of the fine arts program and a mere formality in the fourth chapter will not use "customer C, it will do with the UML do ? "very well. Mr. Zhou Aimin reference to "determination and courage" well describes the programming of the fine arts. He elaborated on the fundamental programming language with humor: sequential, branch (choice), cycle. Also tells you first need to determine a project's goal, then through seminars, fixed for a orderly, you can implement technical solutions. Then sequence, selection, and gradually branch to write code. This is due to my reflection: In the past, I got a problem, do not want to do first of a program, but directly began to write, write write out what to put what consequences this has led to is that the program did not finish, but also because he did not understand well the meaning of problems caused by simply not possible and the need to write, or simply can not compile it, I used this method to deal with perhaps a simple question will not go wrong, but when confronted with complex problems is futile do useful work ah! Moreover, even if all of them were compiled out, however, there are a lot of times, you will find that he wrote a number of modules that conflict is not linked into a program. Such a waste of time and win even thousands of lines of code but did not run, what use is it? I later met project, first carefully examine to determine a precise goal, to be selected in a well-ordered, technical solution can be achieved, then write code to implement this project.
Customers will not use C, you will do with the UML do? This sentence I really have mixed feelings, my old code, that is not user-friendly, just a black box, a hint at all, except me, perhaps no one knows this black box is doing, and their future should always bear in mind that not only will the programming of the people I serve, the more ordinary people!
Programming of the Road, Road to SR, long way to go!