Project managers and technical personnel dont touch
Project managers do live is to gather together a bunch of technical personnel responsible for the charge of the project, the next Dangdie mother.
Most of the company's development projects are to follow suit, if blown up in the vent blew up, did not blow up and no blowing up. If the project is a research-based, so I think the project manager determines the success of the project, a huge responsibility. And 99.99% of the company to 99.99% of the project is not research-oriented, I often set our R & D staff of saying "We are not doing science," we have not come to that, the company, the market is that we need fast developed products, waiting for verification. The following analyze the project manager then 99.99% of the project played a role in the project based on personal experience.
What role is the project manager?
Two basic, with limited resources to control the progress of the project to ensure project quality. Then in the Internet company's competition is so fierce, burning down a project of capitalist money is true that every project there is a certain cost estimates, for the time being will define this period as "try on." "Try on" long or short, according to the two companies involved in the project own point of view, this period probably in two quarters. The first quarter are "project development period" and the second quarter are "trial operation period." According to the subsequent development of the project are to determine the investment project, in extreme cases will be gradually reduced investment, so that the limited small team to continue, unfortunately, to participate in the two projects are the same.
Who is responsible for project performance evaluation?
Uncertainties project leader, operations, sales, technical personnel, is true of all project staff have some responsibility, but not all responsible. Successful products are by a group of "losers" of creation, represent the failure of the project team has made this product failed, Seoul can not believe that the ability to project personnel failed. There are a lot of companies call on ALL IN, product ALLIN, the development of ALL IN, test ALL IN. I think not allow developers to shop and go ALL IN sales of things, ALL IN do not buckle down to make the test operation, ALL IN is not a project manager to bear performance indicators. Each job duty is to do their best to project ALL IN. Seoul believes most positions of responsibility outside of this value creation is ALL IN, this talent too little, hope the project happen if talent to succeed, then I think it is nonsense. Like a lottery, we only have a million millionth of hope, but in our project can not have that hope, even a glimmer. We are a group of mediocre people, practical work in a timely manner has been a failure, it is normal.
The project manager those days of thing?
Experience is not easy to write code, focus on meeting focused on planning; experience of looking at development, emergency fill the pit, guarding the line of tired; experience of more than N complaining about the company, complaining about the team, and constantly complained of irritability work; experience and product and responsible debate stick; and experienced a lot of different teams docking ring true.
Return technology
I return to the technology so that we can not because I am a project manager, but because I do not want to do a project manager, R & D department, a non-technical project manager is unable to gain a foothold. I'm going to continue to do technical team in Taiwan, or a business opportunity I will go to lead the team, I want to focus on being a technology, when a farm yard addicted to the code.