And many domestic technology companies by contact found that these companies are prevalent:
01 , a lot of R & D from morning till night, product development, market success but a handful of products, development of the more die faster;
02 , product development behind closed doors, focus on technology, not focus on the customer; the product was developed to find customers, looking for a selling point;
03 , understand the market do not understand technology, understand the market, do not understand the technology, the demand should not know who is responsible;
04 , product demand accurately grasp decide success or failure, but no one is concerned about demand, even if sometimes do not know how to want to focus on closing note;
05 , not enough to express the structure of demand, demand full "story" format, a direct impact on the demand for different teams consistency of understanding;
06 , a complete lack of demand for the collection, compilation, analysis mechanism, "the company lost contact with the nerve endings in the brain";
07 , not from their ability to enhance the customer needs to guide, but every day complaining about frequent changes in customer demand;
08 , for the needs of everyone "noisy into gruel": arguing with customers, market development and noisy, development and testing noisy, ......
09 , "no coding means there is no work," the idea of mischief, the product development process needs to work short duration, the demand for sub- analysis is not sufficient;
10 , there is no effective demand hierarchical classification, the demand for the different stages should detail to what extent is not clear given righteousness;
11 , a number of industry needs analysis is not clear how the proper use of tools in different stages of analysis needs.
Reproduced in: https: //my.oschina.net/iwenr/blog/227790