This blog compares the three currently popular JavaScript runtime environments : Deno, Bun and Node.js.
Let’s take a look at the feature comparison first:
In addition to these intuitively comparable features on the table, the author also lists some related points worthy of attention:
-
Bun supports Windows to a certain extent. (Just read another blog, Bun is difficult on Windows: https://alemtuzlak.hashnode.dev/why-i-cant-love-bun )
-
Node has begun to work on the permission model.
-
Node
npm listhas an external dependency view. -
Bun has a semi-built-in REPL that will be downloaded when needed.
-
All runtimes provide ARM64 support to varying degrees, with Node.js supporting the widest range of platforms.
-
Although Deno lacks a traditional built-in package manager, it can implement automatic package installation through URL import, specifier import, import_map and package.json.
-
Deno is rumored to be getting a major update soon, which may bring some exciting new features.
The author also discusses aspects such as convenience of use and safety, and the final conclusion is relatively pertinent and objective:
- If maturity, a large ecosystem, and community support are what you value most, Node.js is still a strong contender.
- If you're looking for an increasingly mature runtime environment that's modern, secure by default, and has a first-class development experience, then Deno is the best choice.
- If you want to combine the best of Node.js and Deno with an emphasis on cutting-edge performance and a great development experience, Bun may be the answer you need.
After reading it, I have a reasonable suspicion that the author is a Deno fan:), it doesn’t hurt, as long as his comparison is fruitful. If you have any ideas, you can also leave a message to participate in the discussion.
Blog address: https://hexagon.56k.guru/posts/deno-vs-bun-vs-node