A cutting-edge review of Image Quality Assessment
Image Quality Assessment (IQA) mainly includes two parts. One is subjective quality assessment, that is, people's subjective perception evaluation of pictures. It is generally described quantitatively using MOS or DMOS indicators. The way to obtain it is through subjective psychology. Experiment, establish an image quality evaluation database. According to different distortion types, experimental methods, etc., the types of IQA database are very rich; the other is objective quality evaluation, the evaluation subject is a machine, usually a classifier or regressor is designed to evaluate the image , an image quality evaluation algorithm based on deep learning that has been widely studied at present.
This article mainly summarizes the following two aspects:
- Deep-learning based IQA model
- IQA database
paper
The objective image quality assessment algorithm is mainly divided into two parts. One is NR-IQA, or No-reference IQA, which is a no-reference image quality assessment algorithm; the other is FR-IQA, which is Full-Reference IQA, which is a full-reference image quality assessment. The following is a summary of these two parts
NR-IQA
Below I list the currently common NR-IQA algorithms in chronological order, as shown in the following table:
Algorithm name | Publication time/team | code | type | Google Scholar | Main idea |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIKE | SPL2012 | — | Tradition | – | |
BRISQUE | TIP2012 | — | Tradition | – | |
ILNIQE | TIP2015 | — | Tradition | – | |
HOSA | TIP2016 | — | Tradition | – | |
NRQM (Ma) | CVIU2017 | Matlab | Tradition | – | |
CNNIKA | CVPR2014 | — | DL | – | |
dipIQ | TIP2017 | — | DL | – | |
MIND | TIP2017 | — | DL | – | |
RankIQA | ICCV2017 | — | DL | – | |
WHAT | TIP2018 | — | DL | – | |
WaDIQaM (the deep) | TIP2018 | — | DL | – | |
BPSQM | CVPR2018 | — | DL | – | |
HIQA | CVPR2018 | — | DL | – | |
PI | 2018 PIRM Challenge | — | DL | – | |
PQR | TIP2019 | — | DL | – | |
SFA | TMM2019 | — | DL | – | |
DBCNN | TCSVT2020 | — | DL | – | |
GIQA | ECCV2020 | — | DL | – | |
Meta-IQA | CVPR2020 | — | DL | – | |
HyperIQA | CVPR2020 | — | DL | – | |
UNIQUE | TIP2021 | — | DL | – | |
CKDN | ICCV2021 | — | DL | – | |
MUSIC | ICCV2021 | — | DL | – | |
KonIQ++ | BMVC2021 | — | DL | – |
FR-IQA
Algorithm name | issuing time | type | Google Scholar | code | Main idea |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRKD | AAAI2022 | NAR | A | Official | |
IQT | CVPRW2021 | FR | C | PyTorch | Transformer |
A-DISTS | ACMM2021 | FR | A | Official | |
DISTS | TPAMI2021 | FR | T | Official | |
JND-SalCAR | TCSVT2020 | FR | T | ||
QADS | TIP2019 | FR | T | Project | |
LPIPS | CVPR2018 | FR | C | Project | |
PieAPP | CVPR2018 | FR | C | Project | |
WaDIQaM | TIP2018 | NR/FR | T | Official | |
FSIM | TIP2011 | FR | T | Project | |
VIF/IFC | TIP2006 | FR | OF | Project | |
MS-SSIM | FR | Project | |||
YES | TIP2004 | FR | T | Project | |
PSNR | – | FR |
other
IQA database
IQA databases are mainly divided into two categories, the mainstream IQA database and other eye movement and aesthetics-related databases.
- Mainstream databases mainly include: single distortion database, mixed distortion database, different photographic equipment database and real distortion database
- Other databases mainly include: eye movement database and aesthetics database
Mainstream IQA database
The following is the mainstream IQA database. I will explain it in more detail later. For now, I will summarize the main information.
Name database | issuing time | type | Google Scholar | Link | illustrate | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PaQ-2-PiQ | CVPR2020 | real distortion | CV | Official github | 40k, 120k patches | 4M |
SPAQ | CVPR2020 | – | CVPR2020 | Offical github | 11k (smartphone) | |
KonIQ-10k | TIP2020 | – | TIP2020 | Project | 10k from YFCC100M | 1.2M |
CLIVE | TIP2016 | – | TIP2016 | Project | 1200 | 350k |
PIPAL | ECCV2020 | – | ECCV2020 | Project | 250 | 1.13M |
KADIS-700k | arXiv | – | arXiv | Project | 140k pristine / 700k distorted | 30 ratings (DCRs) per image. |
KADID-10k | QoMEX2019 | – | QoMEX2019 | Project | 81 | 10k distortions |
Waterloo-Exp | TIP2017 | – | TIP2017 | Project | 4744 | 94k distortions |
MDID | PR2017 | – | PR2017 | — | 20 | 1600 distortions |
TIME2013 | SP2015 | – | SP2015 | Project | 25 | 3000 distortions |
LIVEMD | ACSSC2012 | – | ACSSC2012 | Project | 15 pristine images | two successive distortions |
CSIQ | JEI2010 | – | sada | — | 30 | 866 distortions |
TID2008 | 2008 | – | 2009 | Project | 25 | 1700 distortions |
A57 | 2007 | – | 2005 | — | 10 | 185 distortions |
LIVE | TIP2006 | – | TIP2006 | Project | 29 images, 780 synthetic distortions | |
IVC | 2005 | – | 2005 | — | 10 | 185 distortions |