Abstract: There are obvious differences between China and the West in their attitudes and practices towards Web3. This article will delve into the differences between Chinese and Western Web3, decipher the misconceptions, and reveal the truth, aiming to help readers better understand and evaluate these two different Web3 models.
As the development direction of the next-generation Internet, Web3 has aroused widespread attention worldwide. However, there are significant differences in the understanding and practice of Web3 between China and the West, especially in their cognition of blockchain and financial attributes. This article will discuss the characteristics of Chinese and Western Web3 respectively, reveal the misunderstandings in it, and clarify the truth.
1. Western Web3 places too much emphasis on financial attributes and hype, while Chinese Web3 restricts financial attributes.
In fact, there are some differences between China and the West in their views on the financial attributes of Web3. Western Web3 generally has excessive financial attributes and hype attributes, which makes most users unable to control its financial attributes and bear a lot of extra usage costs. This has also led to a lack of real user participation in the western Web3 community, capital is gathered in a few groups, and the number of users is gradually shrinking.
In contrast, China's Web3 has limited financial attributes by design, carrying a small number of financial attributes on the only on-chain currency-digital renminbi. The role of blockchain in China is mainly to realize a decentralized operating platform (database + smart contract), rather than overemphasizing financial attributes. This design makes China Web3 pay more attention to the development of practical applications and technologies, reducing financial risks and additional costs for users.
2. China's Web3 lacks users, while Western Web3 users have already lost money.
Although China's Web3 is relatively conservative in terms of financial attributes, it has great potential in terms of actual number of users. China is naturally suitable for promoting the development of Web3 with its infrastructure capabilities and the characteristics of national unified large-scale infrastructure. From high-speed rail and 5G to blockchain networks, China has been working to build a unified and efficient infrastructure. This has laid the foundation for China to become the world's largest Web3 user country.
In contrast, Western Web3 has problems in the number of users, and its community is mainly composed of venture capital and a few capital groups, lacking real user participation. China's Web3 has huge advantages in terms of user scale and user participation, which is one of the reasons for the rapid development of China's Web3.
3. China's Web3 is a castrated version, and the real Web3 only exists in the West.
In fact, the essence of Web3 lies in the realization of decentralized and distributed applications and services through blockchain technology. Whether it is China or the West, as long as it conforms to this principle, it can be regarded as the real Web3. Through its unique design and practice, China Web3 pays attention to the transparency and sharing of data, and realizes the collaboration and information exchange among various subjects.
For example, the previous problems of data closure and information islands have been solved with the application of blockchain technology, realizing the sharing and intercommunication of data among subjects at all levels. Therefore, China's Web3 model has its unique advantages and practical value, rather than just a castrated version of Western Web3.
In terms of protecting the privacy of Web3 users, ClonBrowser anti-detection fingerprint browser is of great significance. Fingerprint browser technology uses unique characteristics of user devices and browser settings for identification and tracking. By creating a virtual browsing environment and multiple accounts, ClonBrowser can effectively prevent the identification and tracking of fingerprint browsers and provide a higher level of privacy protection. It can not only help users avoid website restrictions and blockades, but also manage multiple accounts and identity information conveniently.
Summarize:
There are obvious differences between China and the West in the perception and practice of Web3. China Web3 is committed to building a unified national Web3 infrastructure by limiting financial attributes and focusing on practical applications, as well as data transparency and sharing. In contrast, Western Web3 has the problems of excessive financial attributes and insufficient user participation.
By correctly understanding the characteristics of China's Web3, we can better promote the development of Web3 in China and realize innovation and value delivery. At the same time, it should be realized that the essence of Web3 is decentralized applications and services based on blockchain technology. Whether it is China or the West, as long as it conforms to this principle, it can be regarded as the real Web3. Let's work together to explore and practice the infinite possibilities of Web3.