Recently, the company requires each department to formulate a detailed KPI assessment plan. After reading the template issued by manpower, it is very unscientific about R&D. It almost treats the R&D work as a factory production line, so it is specially formulated for the agile team of our department. such a set of examination plans.
(Reference: Performance Appraisal for Agile Teams )
Two assessment directions: team performance assessment, individual performance assessment ;
team performance appraisal
Purpose: To motivate team members to take responsibility for overall quality;
Examination content:
1. Whether the deliverables for each iteration are acceptable. (The agile development adopted by the team, each stage will develop an output plan and output target)
-
Purpose: to ensure that the quality of each iteration meets the requirements;
-
Assessment methods: test feedback, team trial, team evaluation;
2. Whether the productivity of each iteration increases rationally . (Whether the architecture is reasonable, later extended, and whether it is easy to modify)
-
Purpose: To reduce the debt of team development, and no longer pay for the mistakes made in the early stage;
-
Assessment method: team assessment;
personal performance appraisal
Purpose: to examine the differences in individual abilities, sense of responsibility, etc. to reflect the differences of each team member
Check point:
1. Quality of work (40% of personal assessment)
-
Purpose: To guide each team member to ensure the quality of the work they are responsible for;
-
Assessment method: number of bugs and acceptability;
2. Workload (20% of the personal assessment)
-
Purpose: To reflect the contribution of each team member to the delivered product;
-
Assessment method: the number of completed function points, the difficulty of technical points;
3. Initiative (20% of the personal assessment)
-
Purpose: To guide individual members to actively communicate and communicate in the team;
-
Assessment method: team assessment;
4. Help the team (10% of the personal assessment)
-
Purpose: To guide other members of the team who can take the initiative or are willing to help, jointly take responsibility for the quality of delivery, and avoid the situation of "sweeping the snow before each door";
-
Assessment method: team assessment;
5. Self-growth (10% of the personal assessment)
-
Purpose: To guide everyone in the team to continuously improve themselves and make continuous improvement;
-
Assessment method: team assessment;
Assessment method:
-
Assessment level: "excellent, good, pass, poor, very poor" five levels;
-
Clarification of scores: For example, 40 points for work quality, 0 points for very poor, 30 points for poor, 60 points for passing, 80 points for good, 100 points for excellent, and discarding the intermediate scores, so that differences can be made explicit and a clear distribution of benefits can be made.
-
Differentiated assessment: In addition to the proportion of the above assessment points, a weighted assessment should be carried out according to individual circumstances. For example, the weighting of senior employees to help the team will be larger, and the weighting of inexperienced new employees' own growth will be larger...
360 degree assessment
-
The assessment is carried out by three subjects: individuals, colleagues (project collaborators), and supervisors (project managers).
-
Confidentiality: The results of the assessment will be assessed by the person in charge of the department.
Dispute Resolution
-
Dilution of subjective factors: clarify team responsibilities and outputs, and clarify individual tasks and outputs;
-
Personal appeal: The person in charge of the department regularly communicates the assessment situation to prevent misunderstanding and unfairness in the assessment;
Reward and punishment measures
The results of the assessment are linked to the distribution of bonuses, the range of salary increases, and even the recommendation to be transferred from the team (there will be regular communication with the supervisor in the middle, and try to avoid situations that are not conducive to individuals and teams)