The strength of all social tribes is closely related to technological innovation, from the rise of the Qin Empire in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, to the great powers of the modern world: the British Empire whose sun never sets, the Tsarist Russia across the Eurasian continent, and the super-powerful superpowers. The hegemony of the United States of America has always had or is currently leading in the field , and now developed countries such as Germany, Japan, France, and South Korea have a place in the technological industrial structure. However, the belief and attitude of a single nation to technology, whether it is "metaphysical" or "metaphysical", will not have a direct relationship with the decline and prosperity of the national fortune. Except for technology, there seems to be a relationship between technology and national fortune. Only the "hand of God" is balancing, and some people call this the establishment of a social civilization system matched with the corresponding technological civilization.
How the "hand of God" behind the technology affects the country's future historical itinerary is not actually technological creation or invention. Too many technological creations and inventions prove that the national movement is not directly related to technological breakthroughs. The Chinese people are most familiar with themselves. When talking about the sad history of the past, many people always feel resentment. This kind of psychology of the superiority of technology is really unnecessary. World civilization is a big garden, and technology is a force without borders. The appearance of face-to-face often has a positive effect on social civilization. Chinese people are good at skills, and the achievements in the point of technology are amazing! However, what our people lack is the overall breakthrough in face, this kind of overall breakthrough How to strengthen, this is a very serious problem. The knowledge and understanding of this issue will help us better touch the "hand of God" behind the technology.
Problems like this are also pointed out in the relevant works of the economist Mao Yushi, that technology needs the support of society and ethics. to deal with. On the whole, the combination of multiple factors makes its "hand of God" unpredictable.
To solve such a problem, this is different from solving world-class mathematical problems. This is another kind of wisdom. Like many philosophical problems, it is really not something that a technical Mars project can handle. For human beings, every time the "Hand of God" appears and hides, it will push the technology of the moment to a new height. At the same time, the "Hand of God" will also set up a high wall of thought and philosophy to hinder the next social technology. overall growth. The author believes that the manifestation of this "hand of God" is the philosophy and thought of great creativity in a certain region and national tribe, but from the perspective of the universe, the "hand of God" may not exist, the so-called human thought. The metaphysical or metaphysical walls of the realm are also insignificant.
The study of history helps us to find a lot of useful experience and lessons in the history of technology and the progress and failure of a certain tribe (individual), thanks to our suffering past, so that our younger generations can learn from China's nearly 100-year history. We have learned a lot of failed cases. One of the most instructive ways to study history is to pay attention to the fate of individuals in history. Summarize methods appropriate to today's technological truths.
In the late Qing Dynasty and modern Chinese history, there are some key historical events as the arguments for the above point of view. In a naval battle in the Yellow Sea, the Beiyang Marine Division, the eight-strongest navy in the world, and the Japanese navy, which had just gone from weak to full-fledged, had The First World War is more typical, and technology alone cannot determine the victory or defeat of a war. We can see the clues from the admiral of the Navy (Commander-in-Chief of the Navy) Ding Ruchang received the letter of persuasion from the Commander-in-Chief of the Japanese Navy, Lieutenant General Ito Yuhiro. "...The reason why the two armies of the Qing Dynasty, the land and the sea, and the continuous battles and the north, can be humbly and calmly investigated, and it is not difficult to see the reason for their defeat. With your wiseness, you have already known the trial. And there are today's losers, it's not the fault of the ruler and the prime minister alone, because they stick to the regular scriptures and don't understand the reason for the change.
......In the past thirty years, the state affairs of Japan have suffered from the bitterness of Ruo He, and those who have been able to escape the danger are well understood by Your Excellency. At this time, our country was in a hurry to get rid of the old rule, adapting measures to the times, and changing the new policy, thinking that one of the main reasons for the country's existence. Today, your country can't help but take the old plan as a top priority, and urgently follow the reform. "
——The full text of the Chinese translation of the original letter can be found in Wang Yunsheng's "Sixty Years of China and Japan" . The Japanese generals objectively mentioned in the letter: "It is because of his adherence to the regular scriptures and his ignorance of the reasons for change."
及“今贵国亦不可以不去旧谋为当务之急,亟从更张”。此战中的北 洋海军的指挥官们大多留洋,掌握了当时海战的最先进技术操作和军 事指挥才能。战败之因,表面看是北洋海军的舰艇速度和炮射速度低 于日本海军,优秀的海军指挥官们又何尝不知道此战败之根源,他们 绝不是我们想象的军事庸才,出港之时,既知此战必败,然而,确是 大清国上上下下在这个时候缺少这样的土壤和气候,将官们最后只能 是“血染海疆”,即使再好的技术也无法拯救没落的清王朝。
拿此海战来说技术,似乎是一个与技术无直接关系的案例,枪、 炮、船舰也非我大清朝所建,然应用之法也是技术一环,如若无整体 的技术面的强大,败之必然。虽然海中有很多中西方文明(日本完全 西化)、个人生死荣辱、民族兴衰等多个层面可以加以书写,本文不 应多谈,实在只是借此说出,海军将士何尝不是技术人员,技术与现实之结合也如同新技术与具体国事的结合后的命运一样,还有一只 “上帝之手”存在,也许是一个民族在某种文明下养成的惰性。大凡 新科学技术与具体国事相结合时,必然不是那么简单了,演变为一个 系统性问题,已有古语云,治大国如烹小鲜尔。技术与现实问题之结 合的方式,是哲学方法,亟待技术人员寻找的,这种寻找的过程与技 术人员的价值观。
由此可以看出,既重视技术之强弱,并不能直接推动这个社会、 国家强大以及提高特定的人群(个人)的经济或者幸福生活。故笔者 仅能基于技术面如何突破,带来整体部落的技术文明进入新的层面, 并带着一定的历史观来理解中国出现的一种技术之死,也是略有私心, 以求技术创造之生。
影响技术人员价值观的因素除了技术人员所处的社会大环境外, 还有相对应的个体环境,比如性别、出生地、年龄、教育、工作、家 庭等。对于真正秉持技术追求的人而言,其内在的结构性与技术结合 的冲突也是存在的,这种结构性冲突往往又因为个体环境的变化,对 技术的成长产生很大影响,同时这也与构成技术人员的社会主流价值 观有很大的关系,给技术人员带着更多关于技术和人生哲学的思考。 而与技术点与技术面的进步有一个共同的聚焦,那就是技术人员的技 术思想和方法,而与技术点不同,技术面的的进步是需要一个让一个 群落一个社会的技术人员的技术思想和方法都有进步,从而得到源源 不断创造生命力。对于中国人来讲,真正开始技术化的第一步,可能国人也开始自 己生产西方蒸汽机和轮船,清朝政府在工业技术浪潮下,派出好几批 留学生到发达国家学习新技术,这一批詹天佑为代表的现代技术人员 也就走进了中国技术的历史。技术面的进步与社会面的制度是同步的, 往往技术面的进步是植根于社会现实的土壤中,在当下,我们处在网 络计算机时代中,在技术面的整体突破,更是需要一批更大数量的技 术人员创新科技产品,思想和方法是我们技术人员要不断总结的。
茅于轼先生在《中国人的道德前景》如此说道:
“现代化技术需要一套与之相适应的社会结构和伦理观念,而这 一套东西绝不可能自然地在原来的专制制度中生长出来。”
笔者认同茅先生所说现代化技术需要一套与之相适应的社会结构 及伦理观念,由于时代及技术的变化,笔者认为需要对此做更多的补 充,将社会结构和伦理观点之外的哲学、心理学等科学一并并入,基 于人性完善我们的技术结构,为技术创造提供良好的土壤、阳光、水 等,如此才可真正锻造国之竞争利器。