Advantages and disadvantages of five commonly used bug management tools

 

1. QC (Quality Center) is an enterprise-level WEB-based test management tool
produced by the original Mercury Interactive company (now acquired by HP) . It needs to install and configure IIS and database , and the system resource consumption is relatively large; the function is very powerful, combined with BUG management , requirements management and use case management functions; and other testing tools, such as the Loardrunner test tool, the interface is better, and data can be shared among them; the English version is not very easy to use, and the most important thing is to charge and The price is not high; there are many online versions of **, but it is more troublesome to find and **, and the performance is not so stable. Resource address: Http://www.hp.com 2. Bugzilla Bugzilla is a Web -based , free and open source powerful bug management system provided by Mozilla Corporation , such as powerful retrieval function and powerful back-end database Support, a variety of configuration settings, etc.; the installation requires Perl and the configuration of the MYSQL database, the process is cumbersome, and it is more troublesome to modify the configuration file ; the English version can be Chinese, but it is prone to garbled characters after Chinese;    Resource address: http://www.



bug zilla.org
3. BugFree is
based on WEB, the configuration and installation are simple, just need to obtain the installation package from the Internet, and then configure the general PHP environment; the purely functional interface is not so beautiful; there is no direct screenshot function, but it can be attached as an attachment There is also a simple report and statistics function; the overall use is relatively easy to use, and it is an open source free Chinese version of the BUG management system.
Resource address: http://www.bugfree.org.cn
4. EasyBUG is
based on WEB online , no configuration is required; the interface is very beautiful, the operation is easy to use, basically as long as people who can surf the Internet will use it; The most practical point of the tool is that the screenshot function is powerful, and it exists directly in the form of pictures, not in the form of attachments; the BUG resolution process is also recorded; the rich statistical reports are clear at a glance; it is domestically produced and available in both Chinese and English version and free.
Resource address: http://www.EasyBug.net
5. Mantis
is a web-based Php+Mysql open source BUG management system, a simple and practical system, and also has a screenshot function, but it exists in the form of attachments, and the report function It is more powerful and needs to be configured before it is available. It is in English, but it can be localized through the Chinese package and configuration. It has email support but also needs to modify the configuration.
Resource address: http://www.mantisbt.org

6 、 jira

Use it to manage projects, track tasks and bugs , and use JIRA's email notification function for collaborative notification, which greatly improves work efficiency in actual work , and the effect is very good! Security and scalability have been brought to the extreme!

JIRA is not just a bug tracking system. Through Jira, customers, developers, and testers can be integrated. Each of them performs their own duties. Information is quickly exchanged and feedback, so that everyone can feel that software development is progressing smoothly and quickly. goal progress. The Jira plug-in under IDEA mainly serves developers, and feeds back information to developers in real time. At the same time, developers quickly feed back the repaired result information to the tracking system. Finally, through continuous integration, the software is quickly updated. These are convenient The convenient operation will greatly encourage all parties in software development, including customers, to respond in a timely manner, which is believed to be appreciated by every customer.

Compared with similar software products TestTracker, ClearQuest and TestDirector, JIRA has the best cost performance! Because TestTracker, ClearQuest, TestDirector and other types of software are priced according to the number of users, and JIRA software does not limit the number of users! Unlimited number of projects and issues created! Free update version for one year! !

 

2. Disadvantages of JIRA

There is no direct way to manage test requirements, test cases , etc.

Guess you like

Origin http://10.200.1.11:23101/article/api/json?id=326580740&siteId=291194637