My opinion on the 5.24 new policy of the national football team

On the night of May 24th, the match between Shanghai SIPG and Jiangsu Suning in the AFC Champions League quarter-finals was just over. The official website of the Chinese Football Association released important
news
. ://www.fa.org.cn/bulletin/file/2017-05-24/520198.htmlNotice
on Restricting High-priced Subscriptionshttp :
//www.fa.org.cn/bulletin/file/2017-05 -24/520199.html The

above two notices instantly detonated the domestic football circle and major media. As of today (25th) afternoon, all the well-known big V on the Internet are mainly negative, while this blogger is basically affirmative This new policy is not a century-old plan for the development of Chinese football, but also a fifty-year plan!

First of all, in view of the rapid development of the Chinese Super League in the past 2-3 years, it has attracted a large number of world-class foreign aid to join (in fact, it is mainly based on gold rush pension), and the major shareholders of the club are actually mainly for their respective business purposes. investment, but in general, the level of the Chinese Super League has risen. At the same time, we must clearly recognize that with the addition of big-name foreign players, although the level of Chinese local players has improved, it is still not possible to rush out of Asia. Under such circumstances, most clubs are actually increasing their investment blindly for commercial interests, which may be a five-minute boom. Times have changed, if the next leader loves basketball, and quickly follows suit and invests heavily in the CBA, the leader will breathe a sigh of relief.
Due to the frenzied expansion in recent years, the Chinese Super League has now blown a big bubble, similar to the real estate bubble, and even worse. The General Administration (Football Association) took precautions and discovered this bad sign in time, so it poured cold water to restrain it and stopped it. The introduction of the New Deal, in the long run, will definitely do more good than harm to the development of the Chinese Super League and even Chinese football.

Secondly, the standpoint of various big V's looking at the issue feels too low, and they only publish some superficial articles and opinions on the New Deal itself. In my opinion, there is a great possibility that the Chinese Super League has largely disrupted the international football transfer market by driving up prices and buying a large number of world-class high-level foreign aid in recent years. The league may well have recently given the Chinese Football Association a warning. Under such circumstances, the Football Association (General Administration) will inevitably introduce relevant restraining policies.

Third, as we all know, my country's top leaders love football, which is an extremely important reason for a considerable number of powerful state-owned capital and private capital to encroach on the Chinese Super League and frantically expand investment in recent years. To put it bluntly, it is just a means for these capitals to seek political speculation. This impure motive of investing in the Chinese Super League for the purpose of profit will inevitably lead to a series of adverse consequences that are not conducive to the development of Chinese football over time. The General Administration (Football Association) saw this phenomenon, and for the long-term prosperity of the Chinese Super League, it took timely measures to curb the crazy market behavior. As the saying goes, if you take a big step, it is easy to pull the egg. The Football Association's courage in this regard is commendable. When it finds a bad sign, it will be resolute and decisive.

Finally, the Chinese Football Association's daring and resolute work efficiency this time is especially worthy of learning from all levels of government who rely on demolition and land sales in China. How to strengthen supervision and curb madness in the face of the real estate industry that has kidnapped China's economy? Turn the tide.