[Source URL] [ https://botanwang.com/articles/202004/%E5%85%AC%E7%9F%A5%E5%85%B6%E5%AE%9E%E5%B0%B1%E6% 98% AF% E6% AD% A3% E5% B8% B8% E4% BA% BA% E5% 98% 9B.html ]
These days I have been thinking about how the public knowledge came about.
Take Zhang Wenhong and Luo Xiang for example. One is a doctor, the other is a teacher, and the internet celebrity is born. The common denominator is that EQ is very high, so high that the truth can be tolerated. But the paper can't hold the fire. For a long time, the truth will reach the interests of some people sooner or later.
In fact, it is not difficult to tell the truth, but the difficulty is how to tell the truth without conflict with the vested interests. Because many vested interests play with unequal information, you tell the truth and make the information equal, which is to eat the pot.
This epidemic is very typical. But many things can't be said, because I still want this number for the time being. For a long time, the only example I can give is that Zhang Wenhong talked about Chinese medicine two days ago. Although he did not answer the question positively, this steel wire has gone very thrilling. This is also the last two days when he did n’t touch him. One of the causes of being posted on the Internet.
That's right. After trying for more than two months on the edge of the truth, it was exposed, and the desire to survive was very strong.
But Luo Xiang should be more durable. I'm not saying that the law is his shield. Rather, as a law player, he has a stronger sense of self-protection. Although Luo Xiang will be exposed sooner or later, his extra-legal fanatic Zhang San has penetrated into the hearts of the people. This sometimes cunning and stupid negative role has prevented many people from becoming the real Zhang San.
In the same way, Zhang Wenhong conveyed a lot of insights and insights, and they all have great merit.
Both Zhang Wenhong and Luo Xiang are intellectuals, and both of them have high barriers to entry. But in addition they have one thing in common, and that is the meaning of their profession, which is confrontation.
Zhang Wenhong is fighting disease and suffering. Luo Xiang is fighting against extra-legal fanatics like Zhang San, and injustice in the world.
For them, confrontation is normal for this society, and confrontation is one of the reasons why human beings can come to this day. But when Zhang Wenhong advocates eating sandwiches, and when Luo Xiang will fight the lawsuit with those with vested interests one day, then they are likely to become foreigners, and they will become "dead lawyers".
Then it becomes a public knowledge that some people attacked.
Zhang Wenhong already has such "Miao Tou ". Luo Xiang has not yet, but I think it will happen sooner or later.
The profession of doctor is logically harmonious, and confrontation is often confined to the field of medicine, but in special periods, "Blowing Whistle " and "Whistling " such as Li Wenliang and Effen have appeared one after another It turns out that the profession of doctor is also restless.
Writers are occupations with low entry barriers, but Lu Xun, the first public knowledge in Chinese history, was a doctor who changed his career. Feng Tang and Yu Hua's top-ranking writers of medical background show that once doctors cross the border, the resistance is also top-notch.
But having said that, what kind of intellectuals are safe?
Maybe not. why?
Back to the public. It is known that the main reason for stigmatization is also related to their confrontation. Stigmatizers seem to believe that confrontation within a country is harmful, and confrontation should occur between countries and between two social systems.
What is interesting is that in the context of many people, the system is extremely fragile and weak. It seems that as long as you criticize and expose the system a little, the system is in danger of collapse. This is easy to understand. For example, when Li Wenliang revealed the information of the epidemic in his classmates' WeChat group, it was regarded as a huge threat to the entire prevention and control system.
Is this the case? Certainly not. Although there are only a handful of vested interests within the system, there are many people controlled by the system, or there are many people who believe in the system. The idea that the system is very fragile comes from the people within the system that the system can no longer control the anxiety of these people.
If you are a person in the system, enjoying the highest level of public medical care and retired treatment, I think it is indeed necessary to maintain the system. But what should most people outside the system do?
The normal logic is to maintain the vitality of the system in a confrontational way, and at the same time force the system to give up part of the benefits to most people. This should be the correct way for society to continue.
I wrote in the film review of "Fanghua" that the system requires you to fight against it. This is not only your obligation, but also the needs of the system itself.
This is not a moral question, but a Tao IQ question. Whether it is a writer, a doctor, a lawyer, a reporter, etc., any thinking intellectual who has read a few correct books can understand this truth.
Intellectuals I understand are people who have received normal general education and have normal thinking and judgment skills.
It is known that it is a normal person.
This is how public knowledge is produced. Moreover, it will continue to exist.
This is my rough thinking.