ForkJoinPool解析

ForkJoinPool是一个运行ForkJoinTask的线程池。

ForkJoinPool与其他线程池的不同之处主要在于,它采用了工作窃取

ForkJoinPool提供了来自非ForkJoinTask客户端的提交以及管理和监视操作的入口点。

A ForkJoinPool provides the entry point for submissions from non-ForkJoinTask clients, as well as management and monitoring operations.

A ForkJoinPool differs from other kinds of ExecutorService mainly by virtue of employing work-stealing: all threads in the pool attempt to find and execute tasks submitted to the pool and/or created by other active tasks (eventually blocking waiting for work if none exist). This enables efficient processing when most tasks spawn other subtasks (as do most ForkJoinTasks), as well as when many small tasks are submitted to the pool from external clients. Especially when setting asyncMode to true in constructors, ForkJoinPools may also be appropriate for use with event-style tasks that are never joined.
A static commonPool() is available and appropriate for most applications. The common pool is used by any ForkJoinTask that is not explicitly submitted to a specified pool. Using the common pool normally reduces resource usage (its threads are slowly reclaimed during periods of non-use, and reinstated upon subsequent use).
For applications that require separate or custom pools, a ForkJoinPool may be constructed with a given target parallelism level; by default, equal to the number of available processors.
The pool attempts to maintain enough active (or available) threads by dynamically adding, suspending, or resuming internal worker threads, even if some tasks are stalled waiting to join others.
However, no such adjustments are guaranteed in the face of blocked I/O or other unmanaged synchronization. The nested ManagedBlocker interface enables extension of the kinds of synchronization accommodated.

In addition to execution and lifecycle control methods, this class provides status check methods (for example getStealCount) that are intended to aid in developing, tuning, and monitoring fork/join applications. Also, method toString returns indications of pool state in a convenient form for informal monitoring.

As is the case with other ExecutorServices, there are three main task execution methods summarized in the following table.
These are designed to be used primarily by clients not already engaged in fork/join computations in the current pool. The main forms of these methods accept instances of ForkJoinTask, but overloaded forms also allow mixed execution of plain Runnable or Callable based activities as well. However, tasks that are already executing in a pool should normally instead use the within-computation forms listed in the table unless using async event-style tasks that are not usually joined, in which case there is little difference among choice of methods.

再看文档。

The common pool is by default constructed with default parameters, but these may be controlled by setting three System getProperty system properties:
* <ul>
* <li>{@code java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.common.parallelism}
* - the parallelism level, a non-negative integer
* <li>{@code java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.common.threadFactory}
* - the class name of a {@link ForkJoinWorkerThreadFactory}
* <li>{@code java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.common.exceptionHandler}
* - the class name of a {@link UncaughtExceptionHandler}
* </ul>

扫描二维码关注公众号,回复: 8197713 查看本文章

If a SecurityManager is present and no factory is specified, then the default pool uses a factory supplying threads that have no Permissions enabled.
The system class loader is used to load these classes.
Upon any error in establishing these settings, default parameters are used. It is possible to disable or limit the use of threads in the common pool by setting the parallelism property to zero, and/or using a factory that may return {@code null}. However doing so may cause unjoined tasks to never be executed.

猜你喜欢

转载自www.cnblogs.com/koushr/p/12044576.html