Spring事务是如何应用到你的业务场景中的?

走过路过不要错过

点击蓝字关注我们

初衷

日常开发中经常用到@Transaction注解,那你知道它是怎么应用到你的业务代码中的吗?本篇文章将从以下两个方面阐述Spring事务实现原理:

  1. 解析并加载事务配置:本质上是解析xml文件将标签加载成 BeanDefinition 对象;

  2. 生成事务代理对象并运行:本质上是Spring AOP在事务这块的应用,将业务Bean替换成事务代理对象(JdkDynamicAopProxy:JDK代理,CglibAopProxy:CGLIB代理);

本文使用的源码版本是Spring 4.3.18.RELEASE,使用的是XML开启事务。

关键类

这里列出几个核心类,提前留个印象,后面会讲解什么时候调用

  1. XmlBeanDefinitionReader 加载XML定义的Bean入口

  2. TxNamespaceHandler 解析XML中的事务标签:advice、annotation-driven等;

  3. InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator 该类实现了 BeanPostProcessor 接口(可以在Bean初始化后进行替换),是生成事务代理类并替换的关键类;

  4. AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource 用来解析业务方法使用注解 @Transaction 上的配置,提供给 TransactionInterceptor 使用;

  5. TransactionInterceptor 事务拦截类:真正处理事务的类,开启、回滚事务,可以理解成切面中的通知:做什么;

  6. BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor 实现了Advisor接口,可以理解为切面:切点(TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut) + 通知(TransactionInterceptor)。

示例代码:

public class TransactionService {


      @Transactional(rollbackFor = Throwable.class)
      public void testTransaction(){
          System.out.println("方法逻辑");
      }
  }
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("config.xml");
     TransactionService transactionService = context.getBean(TransactionService.class);
     transactionService.testTransaction();
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
       xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
       xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop"
       xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
       xmlns:jee="http://www.springframework.org/schema/jee"
       xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx"
       xmlns:task="http://www.springframework.org/schema/task"
       xsi:schemaLocation="
        http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop-4.0.xsd
        http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-4.0.xsd
        http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-4.3.xsd
        http://www.springframework.org/schema/jee http://www.springframework.org/schema/jee/spring-jee-4.0.xsd
        http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx-4.0.xsd
        http://www.springframework.org/schema/task http://www.springframework.org/schema/task/spring-task-4.0.xsd">
    <bean id="transactionService" class="com.yangwq.spring.transaction.TransactionService"/>


    <bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
        <property name="driverClassName" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"/>
        <property name="url" value="jdbc:mysql://127.0.0.1:3306/blog"/>
        <property name="username" value="root"/>
        <property name="password" value="11"/>
    </bean>


    <!-- 定义事务管理器 -->
    <bean id="transactionManager"
          class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager">
        <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
    </bean>
    <!--使用注释事务 -->
    <tx:annotation-driven/>


</beans>


1. 解析并加载事务配置

加载的入口(同时也是Spring容器加载的核心代码):

synchronized (this.startupShutdownMonitor) {
      // Prepare this context for refreshing.
      prepareRefresh();


      // 重点,这里是Spring初始化默认的容器,在这一步会通过解析配置文件将定义的bean转换为 BeanDefinition,
      // 保存在 beanDefinitionMap 中
      ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory = obtainFreshBeanFactory();


      // Prepare the bean factory for use in this context.
      prepareBeanFactory(beanFactory);


      try {
        // Allows post-processing of the bean factory in context subclasses.
        postProcessBeanFactory(beanFactory);


        // Invoke factory processors registered as beans in the context.
        invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(beanFactory);


        // Register bean processors that intercept bean creation.
        registerBeanPostProcessors(beanFactory);


        // Initialize message source for this context.
        initMessageSource();


        // Initialize event multicaster for this context.
        initApplicationEventMulticaster();


        // Initialize other special beans in specific context subclasses.
        onRefresh();


        // Check for listener beans and register them.
        registerListeners();


        // 重点,初始化所有非懒加载bean的方法,也可以理解为根据特定规则将 BeanDefinition 转成 Bean对象的方法
        finishBeanFactoryInitialization(beanFactory);


        // Last step: publish corresponding event.
        finishRefresh();
      }


      catch (BeansException ex) {
        if (logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
          logger.warn("Exception encountered during context initialization - " +
              "cancelling refresh attempt: " + ex);
        }


        // Destroy already created singletons to avoid dangling resources.
        destroyBeans();


        // Reset 'active' flag.
        cancelRefresh(ex);


        // Propagate exception to caller.
        throw ex;
      }


      finally {
        // Reset common introspection caches in Spring's core, since we
        // might not ever need metadata for singleton beans anymore...
        resetCommonCaches();
      }
    }

事务配置的解析在上面的obtainFreshBeanFactory,由于我们使用的是ClassPathXmlApplicationContext 作为容器,它的解析类为:XmlBeanDefinitionReader;核心方法:

public int loadBeanDefinitions(EncodedResource encodedResource) throws BeanDefinitionStoreException {
    Assert.notNull(encodedResource, "EncodedResource must not be null");
    if (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
      logger.info("Loading XML bean definitions from " + encodedResource.getResource());
    }


    Set<EncodedResource> currentResources = this.resourcesCurrentlyBeingLoaded.get();
    if (currentResources == null) {
      currentResources = new HashSet<EncodedResource>(4);
      this.resourcesCurrentlyBeingLoaded.set(currentResources);
    }
    if (!currentResources.add(encodedResource)) {
      throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException(
          "Detected cyclic loading of " + encodedResource + " - check your import definitions!");
    }
    try {
      // 读取 config.xml 文件
      InputStream inputStream = encodedResource.getResource().getInputStream();
      try {
        InputSource inputSource = new InputSource(inputStream);
        if (encodedResource.getEncoding() != null) {
          inputSource.setEncoding(encodedResource.getEncoding());
        }
        // 开始加载 config.xml 文件中定义的bean,这里只是加载成BeanDefinition,初始化在另外的方法
        return doLoadBeanDefinitions(inputSource, encodedResource.getResource());
      }
      finally {
        inputStream.close();
      }
    }
    catch (IOException ex) {
      throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException(
          "IOException parsing XML document from " + encodedResource.getResource(), ex);
    }
    finally {
      currentResources.remove(encodedResource);
      if (currentResources.isEmpty()) {
        this.resourcesCurrentlyBeingLoaded.remove();
      }
    }
  }

doLoadBeanDefinitions 具体解析的方法是在org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.DefaultBeanDefinitionDocumentReader#doRegisterBeanDefinitions 中进行,该方法如下

protected void doRegisterBeanDefinitions(Element root) {
    // Any nested <beans> elements will cause recursion in this method. In
    // order to propagate and preserve <beans> default-* attributes correctly,
    // keep track of the current (parent) delegate, which may be null. Create
    // the new (child) delegate with a reference to the parent for fallback purposes,
    // then ultimately reset this.delegate back to its original (parent) reference.
    // this behavior emulates a stack of delegates without actually necessitating one.
    BeanDefinitionParserDelegate parent = this.delegate;
    this.delegate = createDelegate(getReaderContext(), root, parent);


    if (this.delegate.isDefaultNamespace(root)) {
      String profileSpec = root.getAttribute(PROFILE_ATTRIBUTE);
      if (StringUtils.hasText(profileSpec)) {
        String[] specifiedProfiles = StringUtils.tokenizeToStringArray(
            profileSpec, BeanDefinitionParserDelegate.MULTI_VALUE_ATTRIBUTE_DELIMITERS);
        if (!getReaderContext().getEnvironment().acceptsProfiles(specifiedProfiles)) {
          if (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
            logger.info("Skipped XML bean definition file due to specified profiles [" + profileSpec +
                "] not matching: " + getReaderContext().getResource());
          }
          return;
        }
      }
    }


    preProcessXml(root);
    // 真正解析config.xml文件
    parseBeanDefinitions(root, this.delegate);
    postProcessXml(root);


    this.delegate = parent;
  }


  protected void parseBeanDefinitions(Element root, BeanDefinitionParserDelegate delegate) {
      // 判断根节点是不是默认的节点,实际通过判断根节点的 namespaceURI 属性是不是 http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans ,
      // 我们这里的配置文件声明的正好是这个属性,所以返回的是true,注意bean标签也是默认标签
    if (delegate.isDefaultNamespace(root)) {
      // 获取子节点
      NodeList nl = root.getChildNodes();
      for (int i = 0; i < nl.getLength(); i++) {
        Node node = nl.item(i);
        // 判断子节点是不是标签
        if (node instanceof Element) {
          Element ele = (Element) node;
          // bean标签的解析
          if (delegate.isDefaultNamespace(ele)) {
            parseDefaultElement(ele, delegate);
          }
          // 重点:tx标签在这里进行
          else {
            delegate.parseCustomElement(ele);
          }
        }
      }
    }
    else {
      delegate.parseCustomElement(root);
    }
  }
  // 解析非bean的标签
  public BeanDefinition parseCustomElement(Element ele) {
    return parseCustomElement(ele, null);
  }
  // 解析非默认标签方法
  public BeanDefinition parseCustomElement(Element ele, BeanDefinition containingBd) {
    String namespaceUri = getNamespaceURI(ele);
    // 这里是Spring使用了策略模式解析配置,通过namespaceUri匹配对应的处理类,也就是上面的关键类 TxNamespaceHandler,
    // 这里的resolve运用了懒加载,在获取映射关系handlerMappings属性为null时会从META-INF/spring.handlers 下面获取映射关系,
    // 由于IDEA debug的时候默认会调用getHandlerMappings方法,所以使用debug的时候会发现一开始就有值
    NamespaceHandler handler = this.readerContext.getNamespaceHandlerResolver().resolve(namespaceUri);
    if (handler == null) {
      error("Unable to locate Spring NamespaceHandler for XML schema namespace [" + namespaceUri + "]", ele);
      return null;
    }
    // 获取到处理类后,让处理类开始解析配置
    return handler.parse(ele, new ParserContext(this.readerContext, this, containingBd));
  }

TxNamespaceHandler 最终交给类 AnnotationDrivenBeanDefinitionParser 进行解析事务配置;

public BeanDefinition parse(Element element, ParserContext parserContext) {
    // 注册一个事务工厂事件,允许我们自定义监听事务的提交等操作
    registerTransactionalEventListenerFactory(parserContext);
    String mode = element.getAttribute("mode");
    // 如果使用的是 aspectj 方式,走这个方法
    if ("aspectj".equals(mode)) {
      // mode="aspectj"
      registerTransactionAspect(element, parserContext);
    }
    else {
      // 默认使用的是代理模式 
      // mode="proxy"
      AopAutoProxyConfigurer.configureAutoProxyCreator(element, parserContext);
    }
    return null;
  }


  /**
   * Inner class to just introduce an AOP framework dependency when actually in proxy mode.
   */
  private static class AopAutoProxyConfigurer {


    public static void configureAutoProxyCreator(Element element, ParserContext parserContext) {
      // 重点,注册 InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator 的 BeanDefinition,这个是个关键类,代理业务bean的操作都靠它了
      AopNamespaceUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(parserContext, element);


      String txAdvisorBeanName = TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ADVISOR_BEAN_NAME;
      if (!parserContext.getRegistry().containsBeanDefinition(txAdvisorBeanName)) {
        Object eleSource = parserContext.extractSource(element);


        // 重点,注册一个全局的 TransactionAttributeSource 的BeanDefinition ,用于解析 @Transaction 定义的元数据
        RootBeanDefinition sourceDef = new RootBeanDefinition(
            "org.springframework.transaction.annotation.AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource");
        sourceDef.setSource(eleSource);
        sourceDef.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE);
        String sourceName = parserContext.getReaderContext().registerWithGeneratedName(sourceDef);


        // 重点,注册 TransactionInterceptor 的BeanDefinition,这个就是事务真正执行的类,可以理解为是事务切面上的通知
        RootBeanDefinition interceptorDef = new RootBeanDefinition(TransactionInterceptor.class);
        interceptorDef.setSource(eleSource);
        interceptorDef.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE);
        registerTransactionManager(element, interceptorDef);
        interceptorDef.getPropertyValues().add("transactionAttributeSource", new RuntimeBeanReference(sourceName));
        String interceptorName = parserContext.getReaderContext().registerWithGeneratedName(interceptorDef);


        // 重点,注册 BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor 的BeanDefinition,可以理解为事务的切面,
        // 包含了切点(TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut) + 通知(TransactionInterceptor),保存在 ProxyFactory 中,用于生成代理对象
        RootBeanDefinition advisorDef = new RootBeanDefinition(BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor.class);
        advisorDef.setSource(eleSource);
        advisorDef.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE);
        advisorDef.getPropertyValues().add("transactionAttributeSource", new RuntimeBeanReference(sourceName));
        advisorDef.getPropertyValues().add("adviceBeanName", interceptorName);
        if (element.hasAttribute("order")) {
          advisorDef.getPropertyValues().add("order", element.getAttribute("order"));
        }
        parserContext.getRegistry().registerBeanDefinition(txAdvisorBeanName, advisorDef);


        CompositeComponentDefinition compositeDef = new CompositeComponentDefinition(element.getTagName(), eleSource);
        compositeDef.addNestedComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(sourceDef, sourceName));
        compositeDef.addNestedComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(interceptorDef, interceptorName));
        compositeDef.addNestedComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(advisorDef, txAdvisorBeanName));
        parserContext.registerComponent(compositeDef);
      }
    }
  }

到这里,事务配置的加载就结束了,上面的步骤只是将事务的关键类变成 BeanDefinition,实际上还没有生成Bean对象的,下面我们看下BeanDefinition 是如何变成Bean的(这一个步骤不是Spring事务独有的,是所有BeanDefinition 的共同逻辑),然后是如何生成业务bean代理对象并替换业务bean的。

2. 生成事务代理对象

入口在 1.解析并加载事务配置 列举的finishBeanFactoryInitialization(beanFactory) 方法中:

/**
   * Finish the initialization of this context's bean factory,
   * initializing all remaining singleton beans.
   */
  protected void finishBeanFactoryInitialization(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) {
    // Initialize conversion service for this context.
    if (beanFactory.containsBean(CONVERSION_SERVICE_BEAN_NAME) &&
        beanFactory.isTypeMatch(CONVERSION_SERVICE_BEAN_NAME, ConversionService.class)) {
      beanFactory.setConversionService(
          beanFactory.getBean(CONVERSION_SERVICE_BEAN_NAME, ConversionService.class));
    }


    // Register a default embedded value resolver if no bean post-processor
    // (such as a PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer bean) registered any before:
    // at this point, primarily for resolution in annotation attribute values.
    if (!beanFactory.hasEmbeddedValueResolver()) {
      beanFactory.addEmbeddedValueResolver(new StringValueResolver() {
        @Override
        public String resolveStringValue(String strVal) {
          return getEnvironment().resolvePlaceholders(strVal);
        }
      });
    }


    // Initialize LoadTimeWeaverAware beans early to allow for registering their transformers early.
    String[] weaverAwareNames = beanFactory.getBeanNamesForType(LoadTimeWeaverAware.class, false, false);
    for (String weaverAwareName : weaverAwareNames) {
      getBean(weaverAwareName);
    }


    // Stop using the temporary ClassLoader for type matching.
    beanFactory.setTempClassLoader(null);


    // Allow for caching all bean definition metadata, not expecting further changes.
    beanFactory.freezeConfiguration();


    // 重点,开始初始化所有非懒加载的bean
    beanFactory.preInstantiateSingletons();
  }


beanFactory.preInstantiateSingletons() 具体方法如下:

public void preInstantiateSingletons() throws BeansException {
    if (this.logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
      this.logger.debug("Pre-instantiating singletons in " + this);
    }


    // Iterate over a copy to allow for init methods which in turn register new bean definitions.
    // While this may not be part of the regular factory bootstrap, it does otherwise work fine.将所有注册的BeanDefinition 名称保存到起来
    List<String> beanNames = new ArrayList<String>(this.beanDefinitionNames);


    // Trigger initialization of all non-lazy singleton beans...
    for (String beanName : beanNames) {
      // 获取 BeanDefinition
      RootBeanDefinition bd = getMergedLocalBeanDefinition(beanName);
      // bean定义不是抽象、懒加载而且是单例bean
      if (!bd.isAbstract() && bd.isSingleton() && !bd.isLazyInit()) {
        // 工厂bean特有逻辑,这不是我们的关注点,我们关注点是else的 getBean(beanName);
        if (isFactoryBean(beanName)) {
          final FactoryBean<?> factory = (FactoryBean<?>) getBean(FACTORY_BEAN_PREFIX + beanName);
          boolean isEagerInit;
          if (System.getSecurityManager() != null && factory instanceof SmartFactoryBean) {
            isEagerInit = AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Boolean>() {
              @Override
              public Boolean run() {
                return ((SmartFactoryBean<?>) factory).isEagerInit();
              }
            }, getAccessControlContext());
          }
          else {
            isEagerInit = (factory instanceof SmartFactoryBean &&
                ((SmartFactoryBean<?>) factory).isEagerInit());
          }
          if (isEagerInit) {
            getBean(beanName);
          }
        }
        else {
          // 重点,将 BeanDefinition 创建成bean的核心方法,同时也是执行 BeanPostProcessor 的入口
          getBean(beanName);
        }
      }
    }


    // Trigger post-initialization callback for all applicable beans...
    for (String beanName : beanNames) {
      Object singletonInstance = getSingleton(beanName);
      if (singletonInstance instanceof SmartInitializingSingleton) {
        final SmartInitializingSingleton smartSingleton = (SmartInitializingSingleton) singletonInstance;
        if (System.getSecurityManager() != null) {
          AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Object>() {
            @Override
            public Object run() {
              smartSingleton.afterSingletonsInstantiated();
              return null;
            }
          }, getAccessControlContext());
        }
        else {
          smartSingleton.afterSingletonsInstantiated();
        }
      }
    }
  }

getBean(beanName) 方法比较复杂,这里只列举出关键点:AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory 的 initializeBean方法,所有bean的创建都绕不开这个方法,这个方法是执行实现了 BeanPostProcessor 的bean的逻辑:

protected Object initializeBean(final String beanName, final Object bean, RootBeanDefinition mbd) {
    if (System.getSecurityManager() != null) {
      AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Object>() {
        @Override
        public Object run() {
          invokeAwareMethods(beanName, bean);
          return null;
        }
      }, getAccessControlContext());
    }
    else {
      invokeAwareMethods(beanName, bean);
    }


    Object wrappedBean = bean;
    if (mbd == null || !mbd.isSynthetic()) {
      // 执行 BeanPostProcessor 的 postProcessBeforeInitialization 方法
      wrappedBean = applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInitialization(wrappedBean, beanName);
    }


    try {
      invokeInitMethods(beanName, wrappedBean, mbd);
    }
    catch (Throwable ex) {
      throw new BeanCreationException(
          (mbd != null ? mbd.getResourceDescription() : null),
          beanName, "Invocation of init method failed", ex);
    }
    if (mbd == null || !mbd.isSynthetic()) {
      // 重点,InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator 实现了BeanPostProcessor 接口,所以这里会调用 InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator 的postProcessBeforeInitialization 方法,
      // wrappedBean 是生成代理后对象,wrappedBean 会替换掉传入的bean,如果当前bean需要事务,wrappedBean就是被JDK或者CGLIB代理后的bean
      wrappedBean = postProcessAfterInitialization(wrappedBean, beanName);
    }
    return wrappedBean;
  }

InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator 的 postProcessAfterInitialization 定义在父类:AbstractAutoProxyCreator,AbstractAutoProxyCreator这个类同时是Spring AOP处理的入口,并不是说事务处理独有的,具体实现如下:

public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
    if (bean != null) {
      Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(bean.getClass(), beanName);
      if (!this.earlyProxyReferences.contains(cacheKey)) {
        // 重点,AOP生成代理对象的入口,这里也会生成事务代理对象
        return wrapIfNecessary(bean, beanName, cacheKey);
      }
    }
    return bean;
  }


  // 从Spring容器中获取所有切面bean,并判断是否在切面中,如果是的话生成一个代理对象,怎么代理由具体的切面定义
  protected Object wrapIfNecessary(Object bean, String beanName, Object cacheKey) {
    if (beanName != null && this.targetSourcedBeans.contains(beanName)) {
      return bean;
    }
    if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(this.advisedBeans.get(cacheKey))) {
      return bean;
    }
    // 这里就是用来判断当前bean 能不能代理
    if (isInfrastructureClass(bean.getClass()) || shouldSkip(bean.getClass(), beanName)) {
      this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
      return bean;
    }


    // 首先查找切面Bean,对于本篇文章就是我们上面定义的 BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor 的 BeanDefinition,注意:实际应用场景肯定不仅只有一个切面的。
    // spring现在只有BeanDefinition,这个方法先通过获取切面 beanNames ,然后再调用上面的 getBean 方法生成 BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor bean对象
    Object[] specificInterceptors = getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(bean.getClass(), beanName, null);
    // 需要代理,生成代理对象
    if (specificInterceptors != DO_NOT_PROXY) {
      // 加入缓存中
      this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.TRUE);
      // 真正生成代理的地方
      Object proxy = createProxy(
          bean.getClass(), beanName, specificInterceptors, new SingletonTargetSource(bean));
      this.proxyTypes.put(cacheKey, proxy.getClass());
      // 返回代理后的bean
      return proxy;
    }


    this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
    // 不代理,返回原始bean
    return bean;
  }


  // 获取切面bean,先通过获取切面BeanNames ,然后通过获取bean
  protected Object[] getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(Class<?> beanClass, String beanName, TargetSource targetSource) {
    List<Advisor> advisors = findEligibleAdvisors(beanClass, beanName);
    if (advisors.isEmpty()) {
      return DO_NOT_PROXY;
    }
    return advisors.toArray();
  }


  protected List<Advisor> findEligibleAdvisors(Class<?> beanClass, String beanName) {
    // 这个方法就是获取切面bean,首先从容器中获取实现了 Advisor 的beanNames,然后通过beanName再获取Bean,
    // 对于本篇文章只定义了一个事务切面,所以这里返回的结果是 BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor Bean对象
    List<Advisor> candidateAdvisors = findCandidateAdvisors();
    // 判断当前bean是否能被切面应用,判断规则在下面有说明
    List<Advisor> eligibleAdvisors = findAdvisorsThatCanApply(candidateAdvisors, beanClass, beanName);
    extendAdvisors(eligibleAdvisors);
    if (!eligibleAdvisors.isEmpty()) {
      eligibleAdvisors = sortAdvisors(eligibleAdvisors);
    }
    return eligibleAdvisors;
  }


  // findAdvisorsThatCanApply(candidateAdvisors, beanClass, beanName) 具体实现逻辑在org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils#findAdvisorsThatCanApply 
  public static List<Advisor> findAdvisorsThatCanApply(List<Advisor> candidateAdvisors, Class<?> clazz) {
    if (candidateAdvisors.isEmpty()) {
      return candidateAdvisors;
    }
    List<Advisor> eligibleAdvisors = new LinkedList<Advisor>();
    for (Advisor candidate : candidateAdvisors) {
      if (candidate instanceof IntroductionAdvisor && canApply(candidate, clazz)) {
        eligibleAdvisors.add(candidate);
      }
    }
    boolean hasIntroductions = !eligibleAdvisors.isEmpty();
    for (Advisor candidate : candidateAdvisors) {
      if (candidate instanceof IntroductionAdvisor) {
        // already processed
        continue;
      }
      if (canApply(candidate, clazz, hasIntroductions)) {
        eligibleAdvisors.add(candidate);
      }
    }
    return eligibleAdvisors;
  }


  //  请注意,这个方法是AOP通用判断是否能应用切面的方法,不是事务处理独有的
  public static boolean canApply(Pointcut pc, Class<?> targetClass, boolean hasIntroductions) {
    Assert.notNull(pc, "Pointcut must not be null");
    // 首先判断类能不能匹配上,匹配不上就返回false, BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor 的切点类:
    // TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut,默认ClassFilter 返回true,所以这里不会进if
    if (!pc.getClassFilter().matches(targetClass)) {
      return false;
    }


    // 然后判断方法匹配,TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut 通过继承关系可以看到不是 MethodMatcher.TRUE,所以不会进if
    MethodMatcher methodMatcher = pc.getMethodMatcher();
    if (methodMatcher == MethodMatcher.TRUE) {
      // No need to iterate the methods if we're matching any method anyway...
      return true;
    }


    // 判断是不是引介方法匹配,什么是引介增强:为目标类追加方法,属于类的增强,
    // 而 PointcutAdvisor 属于拦截目标类的方法并增强,TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut  是 PointcutAdvisor 的子类,不属于引介增强
    IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher introductionAwareMethodMatcher = null;
    if (methodMatcher instanceof IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher) {
      introductionAwareMethodMatcher = (IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher) methodMatcher;
    }


    // 开始读取目标类的每一个方法,判断是否在切面中
    Set<Class<?>> classes = new LinkedHashSet<Class<?>>(ClassUtils.getAllInterfacesForClassAsSet(targetClass));
    classes.add(targetClass);
    for (Class<?> clazz : classes) {
      Method[] methods = ReflectionUtils.getAllDeclaredMethods(clazz);
      for (Method method : methods) {
        // 对于事务而言,判断条件重点在 TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut 的 matches 方法
        if ((introductionAwareMethodMatcher != null &&
            introductionAwareMethodMatcher.matches(method, targetClass, hasIntroductions)) ||
            methodMatcher.matches(method, targetClass)) {
          return true;
        }
      }
    }


    return false;
  }
   // TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut 的 matches 方法核心逻辑在 SpringTransactionAnnotationParser#parseTransactionAnnotation(java.lang.reflect.AnnotatedElement)
  // 注意:只会判断 public 的方法,判断有没有 Transactional 注解;判断的顺序为:先判断方法上面有没有,再判断类上面有没有。
  // 判断核心就是看方法或类上面有没有 Transactional 注解,有这个注解就解析这个注解的元数据
  public TransactionAttribute parseTransactionAnnotation(AnnotatedElement ae) {
    AnnotationAttributes attributes = AnnotatedElementUtils.getMergedAnnotationAttributes(ae, Transactional.class);
    if (attributes != null) {
      return parseTransactionAnnotation(attributes);
    }
    else {
      return null;
    }
  }
  // 解析 Transactional  注解元数据
  protected TransactionAttribute parseTransactionAnnotation(AnnotationAttributes attributes) {
    RuleBasedTransactionAttribute rbta = new RuleBasedTransactionAttribute();
    Propagation propagation = attributes.getEnum("propagation");
    rbta.setPropagationBehavior(propagation.value());
    Isolation isolation = attributes.getEnum("isolation");
    rbta.setIsolationLevel(isolation.value());
    rbta.setTimeout(attributes.getNumber("timeout").intValue());
    rbta.setReadOnly(attributes.getBoolean("readOnly"));
    rbta.setQualifier(attributes.getString("value"));
    ArrayList<RollbackRuleAttribute> rollBackRules = new ArrayList<RollbackRuleAttribute>();
    Class<?>[] rbf = attributes.getClassArray("rollbackFor");
    for (Class<?> rbRule : rbf) {
      RollbackRuleAttribute rule = new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule);
      rollBackRules.add(rule);
    }
    String[] rbfc = attributes.getStringArray("rollbackForClassName");
    for (String rbRule : rbfc) {
      RollbackRuleAttribute rule = new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule);
      rollBackRules.add(rule);
    }
    Class<?>[] nrbf = attributes.getClassArray("noRollbackFor");
    for (Class<?> rbRule : nrbf) {
      NoRollbackRuleAttribute rule = new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule);
      rollBackRules.add(rule);
    }
    String[] nrbfc = attributes.getStringArray("noRollbackForClassName");
    for (String rbRule : nrbfc) {
      NoRollbackRuleAttribute rule = new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule);
      rollBackRules.add(rule);
    }
    rbta.getRollbackRules().addAll(rollBackRules);
    return rbta;
  }
  // 以上就是 findAdvisorsThatCanApply(candidateAdvisors, beanClass, beanName) 的逻辑


  // 下面回到wrapIfNecessary方法,如果当前bean需要生成代理对象,会调用下面的这个方法
  protected Object createProxy(
      Class<?> beanClass, String beanName, Object[] specificInterceptors, TargetSource targetSource) {


    if (this.beanFactory instanceof ConfigurableListableBeanFactory) {
      AutoProxyUtils.exposeTargetClass((ConfigurableListableBeanFactory) this.beanFactory, beanName, beanClass);
    }


    // 创建代理工厂,用于创建代理bean
    ProxyFactory proxyFactory = new ProxyFactory();
    proxyFactory.copyFrom(this);


    // 判断是否配置了代理目标类,配置了这个选项会全部使用cglib代理
    if (!proxyFactory.isProxyTargetClass()) {
      if (shouldProxyTargetClass(beanClass, beanName)) {
        proxyFactory.setProxyTargetClass(true);
      }
      else {
        evaluateProxyInterfaces(beanClass, proxyFactory);
      }
    }
    // 把所有的切面类放入 ProxyFactory
    Advisor[] advisors = buildAdvisors(beanName, specificInterceptors);
    proxyFactory.addAdvisors(advisors);
    proxyFactory.setTargetSource(targetSource);
    customizeProxyFactory(proxyFactory);


    proxyFactory.setFrozen(this.freezeProxy);
    if (advisorsPreFiltered()) {
      proxyFactory.setPreFiltered(true);
    }


    // 开始创建代理bean
    return proxyFactory.getProxy(getProxyClassLoader());
  }

proxyFactory.getProxy(getProxyClassLoader()) 方法实现:

public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
    return createAopProxy().getProxy(classLoader);
  }


  // createAopProxy方法逻辑,config 其实就是上面的 proxyFactory 对象,这个对象包含了目标对象以及切面类:
  public AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
    // optimize:代理是否应该执行优化,一般用不上
    // proxyTargetClass:这个属性为treu时,不管目标类是不是实现的接口,都使用cglib代理
    // hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces:是否只使用了Spring支持的代理接口,如果用户自定义了代理接口不能进行cglib代理
    if (config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass() || hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config)) {
      Class<?> targetClass = config.getTargetClass();
      if (targetClass == null) {
        throw new AopConfigException("TargetSource cannot determine target class: " +
            "Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation.");
      }
      // 如果目标类是接口或者已经被jdk代理过了,使用jdk代理
      if (targetClass.isInterface() || Proxy.isProxyClass(targetClass)) {
        return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
      }
      // 其他情况使用CGLIB代理
      return new ObjenesisCglibAopProxy(config);
    }
    // 使用JDK代理
    else {
      return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
    }
  }


  // ObjenesisCglibAopProxy 的 getProxy(classLoader) 方法,cglib是使用Enhancer创建代理对象的 :
  public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
    if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
      logger.debug("Creating CGLIB proxy: target source is " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
    }


    try {
      // 获取目标类
      Class<?> rootClass = this.advised.getTargetClass();
      Assert.state(rootClass != null, "Target class must be available for creating a CGLIB proxy");
      // 代理类的父类,默认是目标类
      Class<?> proxySuperClass = rootClass;
      // 如果目标类以及是cglib代理类,
      if (ClassUtils.isCglibProxyClass(rootClass)) {
        // 取cglib代理类的父类作为代理类的父类
        proxySuperClass = rootClass.getSuperclass();
        // 获取代理类的接口追加到当前类的接口集合中
        Class<?>[] additionalInterfaces = rootClass.getInterfaces();
        for (Class<?> additionalInterface : additionalInterfaces) {
          this.advised.addInterface(additionalInterface);
        }
      }


      // 验证目标类是否能被代理,仅仅是打印日志,不做其他处理
      validateClassIfNecessary(proxySuperClass, classLoader);


      // 使用Enhancer 来构造cglib代理对象
      Enhancer enhancer = createEnhancer();
      if (classLoader != null) {
        enhancer.setClassLoader(classLoader);
        if (classLoader instanceof SmartClassLoader &&
            ((SmartClassLoader) classLoader).isClassReloadable(proxySuperClass)) {
          enhancer.setUseCache(false);
        }
      }
      enhancer.setSuperclass(proxySuperClass);
      enhancer.setInterfaces(AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised));
      enhancer.setNamingPolicy(SpringNamingPolicy.INSTANCE);
      enhancer.setStrategy(new ClassLoaderAwareUndeclaredThrowableStrategy(classLoader));


      // 重点,设置回调的类,很重要的一个类 DynamicAdvisedInterceptor,这个类就是应用AOP 通知的地方,对于本篇文章就是应用TransactionInterceptor
      Callback[] callbacks = getCallbacks(rootClass);
      Class<?>[] types = new Class<?>[callbacks.length];
      for (int x = 0; x < types.length; x++) {
        types[x] = callbacks[x].getClass();
      }
      // fixedInterceptorMap only populated at this point, after getCallbacks call above
      enhancer.setCallbackFilter(new ProxyCallbackFilter(
          this.advised.getConfigurationOnlyCopy(), this.fixedInterceptorMap, this.fixedInterceptorOffset));
      enhancer.setCallbackTypes(types);


      // 创建代理类的字节码,并创建实例,实例设置回调
      return createProxyClassAndInstance(enhancer, callbacks);
    }
    catch (CodeGenerationException ex) {
      throw new AopConfigException("Could not generate CGLIB subclass of " + this.advised.getTargetClass() +
          ": Common causes of this problem include using a final class or a non-visible class",
          ex);
    }
    catch (IllegalArgumentException ex) {
      throw new AopConfigException("Could not generate CGLIB subclass of " + this.advised.getTargetClass() +
          ": Common causes of this problem include using a final class or a non-visible class",
          ex);
    }
    catch (Throwable ex) {
      // TargetSource.getTarget() failed
      throw new AopConfigException("Unexpected AOP exception", ex);
    }
  }




// JdkDynamicAopProxy  的 getProxy(classLoader) 方法:
public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
    if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
      logger.debug("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: target source is " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
    }
    Class<?>[] proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised, true);
    findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(proxiedInterfaces);
    return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, proxiedInterfaces, this);
  }

通过2. 生成事务代理对象,此时创建的bean就是以及被JDK或者CGLIB代理的类,这一步是Spring AOP通用的处理逻辑,那具体是怎么运行的呢?

JDK动态代理运行:

// 本质是调用org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy#invoke方法
  public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
    MethodInvocation invocation;
    Object oldProxy = null;
    boolean setProxyContext = false;


    TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource;
    Class<?> targetClass = null;
    Object target = null;


    try {
      if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
        // The target does not implement the equals(Object) method itself.
        return equals(args[0]);
      }
      else if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
        // The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself.
        return hashCode();
      }
      else if (method.getDeclaringClass() == DecoratingProxy.class) {
        // There is only getDecoratedClass() declared -> dispatch to proxy config.
        return AopProxyUtils.ultimateTargetClass(this.advised);
      }
      else if (!this.advised.opaque && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() &&
          method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) {
        // Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config...
        return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args);
      }


      Object retVal;


      if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
        // Make invocation available if necessary.
        oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
        setProxyContext = true;
      }


      // May be null. Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target,
      // in case it comes from a pool.
      target = targetSource.getTarget();
      if (target != null) {
        targetClass = target.getClass();
      }


      // 获取方法的拦截器链,对于本篇文章就是关键类:BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor
      List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);


      // Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct
      // reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation.
      if (chain.isEmpty()) {
        // We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly
        // Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does
        // nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying.
        Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args);
        retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, argsToUse);
      }
      else {
        // 将所有参数:代理对象,目标对象,方法,参数,拦截器链封装到一个ReflectiveMethodInvocation对象中
        invocation = new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain);
        // 然后调用ReflectiveMethodInvocation的proceed方法,会执行拦截器
        retVal = invocation.proceed();
      }


      // Massage return value if necessary.
      Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
      if (retVal != null && retVal == target &&
          returnType != Object.class && returnType.isInstance(proxy) &&
          !RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) {
        // Special case: it returned "this" and the return type of the method
        // is type-compatible. Note that we can't help if the target sets
        // a reference to itself in another returned object.
        retVal = proxy;
      }
      else if (retVal == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) {
        throw new AopInvocationException(
            "Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method);
      }
      return retVal;
    }
    finally {
      if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
        // Must have come from TargetSource.
        targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
      }
      if (setProxyContext) {
        // Restore old proxy.
        AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
      }
    }
  }

org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation#proceed 方法:

public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
    // 所有拦截器调用完成,一般情况是没有匹配到任意的拦截器,这里会执行目标类本身的方法
    if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) {
      return invokeJoinpoint();
    }


    // 获取拦截器链中的第一个拦截器
    Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice =
        this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
    // 通知器或通知是动态匹配方法拦截器类型,对于本篇文章,interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice 是TransactionInterceptor对象,
    // 所有走的是else,直接执行TransactionInterceptor的invoke方法
    if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) {
      // 动态匹配方法拦截器
      InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm =
          (InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice;
      // 匹配成功就执行对应的拦截器
      if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, this.targetClass, this.arguments)) {
        return dm.interceptor.invoke(this);
      }
      else {
        // 如果不匹配,就跳过此拦截器,递归执行下一个拦截器
        return proceed();
      }
    }
    else {
      // 如果是一个interceptor,直接调用这个interceptor对应的方法
      return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this);
    }
  }

CGLIB代理运行:

// 其实就是创建代理对象时设置的回调类DynamicAdvisedInterceptor
  private static class DynamicAdvisedInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {


    private final AdvisedSupport advised;


    public DynamicAdvisedInterceptor(AdvisedSupport advised) {
      this.advised = advised;
    }


    // 主要是这个方法执行拦截,处理逻辑大致和JDK动态代理差不多,都是获取拦截器链,
    // 然后构建ReflectiveMethodInvocation的子类CglibMethodInvocation对象,
    // 执行ReflectiveMethodInvocation的proceed方法
    @Override
    public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
      Object oldProxy = null;
      boolean setProxyContext = false;
      Class<?> targetClass = null;
      Object target = null;
      try {
        if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
          // Make invocation available if necessary.
          oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
          setProxyContext = true;
        }
        // May be null. Get as late as possible to minimize the time we
        // "own" the target, in case it comes from a pool...
        target = getTarget();
        if (target != null) {
          targetClass = target.getClass();
        }
        // 获取方法的拦截器链,对于本篇文章就是关键类:BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor
        List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
        Object retVal;
        // Check whether we only have one InvokerInterceptor: that is,
        // no real advice, but just reflective invocation of the target.
        if (chain.isEmpty() && Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) {
          // We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly.
          // Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor, so we know
          // it does nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot
          // swapping or fancy proxying.
          Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args);
          retVal = methodProxy.invoke(target, argsToUse);
        }
        else {
          // 将参数封装成CglibMethodInvocation对象并执行proceed方法,CglibMethodInvocation 其实是ReflectiveMethodInvocation的子类,可以理解为ReflectiveMethodInvocation是模板类,CglibMethodInvocation通过重写了部分方法,proceed是两种代理处理的共同逻辑
          retVal = new CglibMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain, methodProxy).proceed();
        }
        retVal = processReturnType(proxy, target, method, retVal);
        return retVal;
      }
      finally {
        if (target != null) {
          releaseTarget(target);
        }
        if (setProxyContext) {
          // Restore old proxy.
          AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
        }
      }
    }


    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object other) {
      return (this == other ||
          (other instanceof DynamicAdvisedInterceptor &&
              this.advised.equals(((DynamicAdvisedInterceptor) other).advised)));
    }


    /**
     * CGLIB uses this to drive proxy creation.
     */
    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return this.advised.hashCode();
    }


    protected Object getTarget() throws Exception {
      return this.advised.getTargetSource().getTarget();
    }


    protected void releaseTarget(Object target) throws Exception {
      this.advised.getTargetSource().releaseTarget(target);
    }
  }


事务的最终执行类 TransactionInterceptor 的invoke 方法:

public Object invoke(final MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
    // Work out the target class: may be {@code null}.
    // The TransactionAttributeSource should be passed the target class
    // as well as the method, which may be from an interface.
    Class<?> targetClass = (invocation.getThis() != null ? AopUtils.getTargetClass(invocation.getThis()) : null);


    // Adapt to TransactionAspectSupport's invokeWithinTransaction...
    return invokeWithinTransaction(invocation.getMethod(), targetClass, new InvocationCallback() {
      @Override
      public Object proceedWithInvocation() throws Throwable {
        // 事务执行完毕后调用链继续向下执行
        return invocation.proceed();
      }
    });
  }


  protected Object invokeWithinTransaction(Method method, Class<?> targetClass, final InvocationCallback invocation)
      throws Throwable {


    // 获取当前方法的事务属性
    final TransactionAttribute txAttr = getTransactionAttributeSource().getTransactionAttribute(method, targetClass);
    // 获取事务管理器
    final PlatformTransactionManager tm = determineTransactionManager(txAttr);
    // 方法名
    final String joinpointIdentification = methodIdentification(method, targetClass, txAttr);


    // 如果方法没有事务或者事务管理器不属于CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager,CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager需要回调函数来实现事务流程,而我们常用的DataSourceTransactionManager就不是CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager
    if (txAttr == null || !(tm instanceof CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager)) {
      // 创建TransactionInfo事务对象,事务的管理都是通过TransactionInfo对象来完成,这里创建事务会使用到Spring的事务隔离级别,具体的逻辑可以自行查看
      TransactionInfo txInfo = createTransactionIfNecessary(tm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification);
      Object retVal = null;
      try {
        // 拦截器链继续向下执行
        retVal = invocation.proceedWithInvocation();
      }
      catch (Throwable ex) {
        // 抛出异常时提交或者回滚事务
        completeTransactionAfterThrowing(txInfo, ex);
        throw ex;
      }
      finally {
        // 重置TransactionInfo 的 ThreadLocal
        cleanupTransactionInfo(txInfo);
      }
      // 提交/回滚事务
      commitTransactionAfterReturning(txInfo);
      return retVal;
    }
    // else使用的是CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager,
    else {
      // .......略
    }
  }

总结

以上就是事务应用到业务场景中的原理,可以简单理解:Spring事务是在Spring AOP的基础上开发的,关注关键类:TransactionInterceptor 的实现就行了,不管是JDK动态代理还是CGLIB代理都是要用到这个类去提交/回滚事务的。如有错误欢迎指出。

往期精彩推荐

腾讯、阿里、滴滴后台面试题汇总总结 — (含答案)

面试:史上最全多线程面试题 !

最新阿里内推Java后端面试题

JVM难学?那是因为你没认真看完这篇文章

—END—

关注作者微信公众号 —《JAVA烂猪皮》

了解更多java后端架构知识以及最新面试宝典

你点的每个好看,我都认真当成了

猜你喜欢

转载自blog.csdn.net/yunzhaji3762/article/details/108878544