Which is better for l2 market interface?

Many people will be entangled in Tongdaxin or Flush when choosing the l2 market interface. Which of the l2 market interfaces provided by these two different institutions is better?

If you really need L2, both Tongdaxin and Flush should choose L2. For short-term, especially ultra-short boards, you may need a more advanced version than L2, with some quantization functions, so there is one L2 and one more advanced. The worst is 2 L2. Why choose two, one software is definitely not enough for short-term, no one software can cover all the functions, but if only two software can cover all the main functions, it is the combination of Tongdaxin and Flush.


If you don't want to choose both at the same time, is there any way? You can also choose a stock trading interface with a market function, or a tool that can be upgraded from an l2 data interface to a quantitative trading interface, such as:

Now it is very convenient to subscribe to many l2 market interfaces . You can download the demo at https://gitee.com/l2gogogo. It seems that you can still try it now. Learn more about it yourself.

おすすめ

転載: blog.csdn.net/QQ2037696191/article/details/128255482