China K12 education of the head company, under no matter online or offline, volume management teacher has reached 10 million people, 20 million of the order.
From the business point of view, a simple pile head is not difficult, but how to manage the order of a hundred thousand employees is a big problem. Purely from the point of view of commercial law, the expansion would have to be replicable, and can copy the most critical step is standardization.
US group to do takeout, do sea fishing chain brand, through enabling technology, and constantly improve the standardization of the operating companies to support expansion, are successful business case.
The US group business orders, delivery man taking meals, room AI system through the whole process standardized, user-US group in the country takeaway, room experience is the same.
Sea fishing through the design and supply chain training system, allowing users at any sea fishing can experience the same standard of food and service.
Similarly, K12 educational institutions in the past decade standardization system will be trained "teachers 70 points" spread throughout the country.
However, the more in-depth understanding of the education sector, I started thinking about this question more often: teacher, or K12 education sector, whether it be standardized?
The core of education is individualized, teachers as an engineer of human souls, charged with educating the next generation, to guide the next generation of mission. But when an organization needs to manage hundreds of thousands of teachers, when teachers can only become a "robot" because only "robot" in order to standardize and scale, was easy to manage. So thousands of people face a "robot" to teach them students, obliterate personality, movements are clean, it does not meet the essence of education, but also against humanity.
K12 education and training institutions, students at this stage is the most important outside of school and family in addition to space to learn and grow. En-cow data show that China's K12 educational counseling and training institutions, accounting for nearly one-third of the total training institute. Whether it is "excellent training" or "making it up", covering knowledge of the course has been completed at the school. Training institutions need to focus on, not only the level of knowledge of the student complement and extend, should be on study habits, explore methodology, and cognitive learning deeper.
Looking back on our student, every teacher to teach us not only one plus one equals two theoretical knowledge, more education of our people doing things virtues, something parents expect their children can receive education, the national promote personnel training direction.
There is a business education company, originally made software to solve the problem of student learning and homework with the system for two years found nowhere to run business model, students take the initiative to buy their own job to do it? Obviously not. The software can be part of the educational system, but it can not solve the problem of education itself.
Later, the company restructuring double classroom teacher, the teacher let the speaker responsible for quality teaching, tutor responsible for each day of student learning and psychological counseling, encourage or, to urge worth mentioning, emotional and learning process temperature given by the teacher.
The company hopes to expand the scale of education teachers into robots, non-standard nature of education requires teachers can not become a robot, which is contradictory nature.
I " | really new economic trends and pseudo-outlet 100 people three weeks Almanac said that" in the future of education, the teacher should be a combination of technology +.
Be standardized in mathematics, English and other subjects, I think it can be done by teaching the machine, but there is more involved in the field of the soul, the spirit, the teacher should be education, through exchanges with students to solve problems on the ideological level students, this is the future trend. If a specific percentage of how much it would, I think it might be six to four, it could be seven to three.
Technology + teacher is the real individualized.
In the judgment of history student learning outcomes, the machine must be more accurate than the teacher. Machines do work with the people of the match, according to the data of students learning the past, the students recommend suitable topics and learning programs. The teacher is a methodology to solve the above problem students, the so-called thousand thousand faces. This can be seen as the application of today's headlines model in the education sector.
This model not only solves the problem of teachers expansion, but also to solve the real problems of education; both to enhance the efficiency of teacher education and student learning, but also reduce the cost of parents.
In the future, the teacher can have no contact with the case of students, the direct use of the learning data analysis systems of the past, to develop the most suitable solution. In the process of teaching the right medicine, from the point of view of human nature and willingness to help students improve their thinking "science", and the "learning" to assist the machine to complete.
Overall, the future of K12 education, simply pile head, driven by standardization of education manpower companies may indeed make money from a commercial point of view, but not respected in the long run, not for human progress diversified development trend.
Brought + technology teacher model, teachers return to the essence of education, individualized, respected. More importantly, this model train a student, is based on the mastery of knowledge, independent of cognition, three positive outlook, a new generation of young and full of creativity.
A youth, it is a lot of opportunities and challenges facing the country, the urgent need to treasure. (Finish)