Decision-making power - doers do not believe that the theoretical analysis (4)

1 , doer of style

We talk in front of decision-making power are rational, there is an article about the excellent qualities of the CEO, which point is that quick decisions, even wrong decision than no good, that argument sounds a very good acceptance, this racking our brains dry way in the end it really good?

In fact, just push the CEO this way is not racking our brains dry regardless of the cost, excluding investment Mangfu behavior, but rather to test the water, they kind of CEO do not believe in market research, product will not be completed until after mature market, but do first batch, put on the market point of view the effect is good, if the good effect on the next production, is not good, is not produced, there is not much loss.

Doer so-called "science", or else not to do it, but a good grasp of the intensity of the beginning. Not sure you can start with a small-scale exploratory. To put it plainly, no need to do so many theoretical analysis, first to a little physical contact, if the other party reacted strongly, it would come to a halt; if they do not resist, even reluctantly, it would increase the intensity of harassment.

Say a digression, I think of a thing today.

Today went to the Post Office Building, there were a number of vendors to find the information director of the Post Office Building, director of the information department can hope to buy their own storage and servers, sales of these companies have done their best, say their own products more than a lot of good , the number of awards won, the number of patented technologies. Director of the Information Section of the firm as an old dog, do not listen to what is said these sales, regardless of the vendor how much of patented technologies, said only one sentence: "You regard the various devices take over, we test, who's who let's easy! "Having left, nice! Pretty! In fact, director of the information department do not believe those words art sales staff know what these patents and awards, and is simply unreliable, a mule is a horse, we pull out yo! This is the doer of the school head! ! Do not believe the hype market research, get the facts speak. Then again, the information director of the trappings of a man of action like this is actually not particularly common, a considerable part of the information department director irrational, I've seen a director of the information department of the university, he is not computer majors in college, for these network security appliances do not understand how he choose which of the products, nor is it based on performance and quality is good or bad, but behold a sale can move him, who speaks good story! Who speak nice! Whose to use.

2, professional and obsessive-compulsive disorder

In fact, test the water this concept can also be used to guide our lives.

tom is not a professional chemist, but he wanted to do pharmacists, pharmacists because a lot of money, but want to be trained pharmacists need a long time, he was not sure whether it should abandon the current job to learn, do not know whether pharmacists in this industry is really like. tom thought of a good way, he found a pharmacy for a free month of odd jobs for them, viewing experience working pharmacist.

This method is particularly good, the vast majority of students are without testing the waters on the choice of his profession, in the end find their professional simply not suitable for them, this is not a tragedy it?

Peggy is an obsessive-compulsive disorder, he is in the things lawyers secretary, responsible for collating copywriting, copywriting requirements of the law firm is relatively high. Peggy is very painful, she is not only a day to detect the anti-copy verbatim several times, but also to take home inspection, checking over and over again many times, this condition made her very uncomfortable, her desperation to find a psychiatrist.

A psychiatrist gave her an idea, it is divided into so few process:

  1. Home inspection only three times
  2. Take home only a secondary inspection
  3. Home inspection only once
  4. Without a home, just check the company

Peggy shows a psychiatrist to do first the first step, confirm that she only checked it three times does not give the company a loss, the boss and the boss did not blame you, then the next step. This approach allows ease of execution Peggy, and she carefully loosen the requirements on their own, so that the fourth step. Then there are several processes:

5, a deliberate mistake in punctuation copy them

6, made a syntax error

7, made a spelling mistake

Peggy seventh step has been done, because the company does not have a spelling mistake and lose the case, in fact, the boss and colleagues that no one noticed that he was wrong! Peggy OCD cured.

Well, we finally make a conclusion, the way to test the water three principles:

  1. Try new things possible
  2. Try to control, must not be pressed on everything to ensure that no great consequences
  3. Get feedback, learn from the results, feel free to adjust practices

 

 

Guess you like

Origin www.cnblogs.com/yizhangheka/p/11610178.html