How about a little more efficient to learn offensive and defensive thinking and experience:

-> When you get a "technical point", or experiencing what a so-called "skills", even tools, learn how to further expand the thinking? 

As follows:
1 .-> TM which in the end is what?
2 .-> "under normal circumstances" which have been used in peacetime, take it to somewhere or doing something that could help solve some of what practical?? business problem?
3 .-> it "under normal circumstances", specifically how it works? or principle and its internal roughly normal execution process like?
4 .-> in practice penetrate in the end we can use it to do for you? What can achieve the ultimate use of the effect? or it can help us to avoid or solve some kind of actual penetration problem?
5 .-> it evolved for the specific use scenarios What are? coverage how it affects?
6 .-> detailed conditions for the use of what is? successful use restrictions whether harsh? is there value to continue in-depth study of the nature of their existing goals?
7 .-> actual use may be present in what the risk? can advance avoid these risks? how to circumvent? whether it can be remedied in the event of misuse? how to remedy?
8 .-> can targeted improvement in its original use, based on the depth of its weaponization and then Then put into combat?
9 .-> Can I pass this and think of some other derivative use of scene? Or So sprouted out some of the more outstanding use of alternative ideas?
10 .-> may be a direct result of careful analysis of the circumstances under which the use of failure?
11 .-> how to use this defense from the source?

After the summary:
-> detailed answers to these questions carefully combing summary, and finally all put into notes or documents
-> With the follow-up their own system of continuous improvement to deepen knowledge and a lot of practical experience, kept to himself before modifying article / note some errors in perception
-> finally, to achieve true master a technical point of even one area
-> after the attack and defense technology development trend of more and more likely to be biased in favor of "special spirit" rather than " large "
-> slowly try to break a single point and then gradually global control

 

 

Original link: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0OTkzOTc2Nw==&mid=2247484653&idx=1&sn=7a303f610b0d91968770a1fe2fbd4f65&chksm=e98896b5deff1fa3534782580151473333e14b647b6c2be0746dff7615391bffa1067b96c6cb&scene=0&xtrack=1&key=e16964c072f0d5a775607a0cf212ff2e42af4b3d2982a83e5e815c8f621c082ab7d7efc62e0fbb7c2daa21d3706891e1920cf11e8816bf82cac81057c799c8d22f13befadf6aba160508229de26ee924&ascene=1&uin=MjkzOTU5NTEx&devicetype=Windows+10&version=62060834&lang=zh_CN&pass_ticket= HZH5L5% 2FeNEHx8wJMxXTepzqjnzCYZD1ChXx% 2Bi9JzroHP8HvrlLXW8N9twVgN8KsS

 

Guess you like

Origin www.cnblogs.com/blogs-1024/p/11573692.html