First, the detailed work Standards Release
About blog park job Java Rating: Java learning to teach this semester, Li Jin teacher's score is ABCD four grades, respectively, corresponding to excellent, good, pass, fail. As the blog garden can not use letter grades, so I will use 1234 to mark, respectively ABCD correspond to the basic scoring criteria are as follows:
A: beautiful writing on the blackboard, focus, perfect to complete the job tasks and have their own thinking and summary can also be questioned (number <= 8).
B: almost every job content, almost writing on the blackboard.
C: barely complete job tasks, the job is not completed, submit the results of error
there is nothing on unpaid, or paid not write a blog (along with screenshots on the system time) jobs such as illegible: D
In addition, this semester will according to the specific requirements of each additional job additional scoring criteria, the notice to everyone in every job
Note:
1, unpaid or forget the opportunity to make the students did not pay, should be recorded as D grade, as to why, we are adult, you should know the right time to do something, do something, then do not bear the consequences, leave please find an explanation and teacher Li Jin Screenshot relevant content to me, is reserved for the end of the review.
2, plagiarism will be no ranking, and marked in the score column plagiarism; suspected plagiarism will be no ranking, and marked achievements in the field of suspected plagiarism.
3, any objection, please apply for review to the teacher, then the teacher asked TA review.
This week additional criteria: coding standard MD format is not carried out, classified as c
Second, the personnel file A week
Third, there is a problem this week
1, for object-oriented design language not clear to understand. In the programming process is reflected, class and object relationships are not clear and the use of unskilled
2, the programmer does not have a foundation of learning. Weekly summary task, just copy notes for a week to learn to organize and transcripts. Did not have to explore the process of their own learning problems, the study of new technologies and techniques for their own learning about a week, such as: What plan did not set a new, whether completed his day's plan, there is in learning What can interfere with themselves and how they are solved and so on are discussed.
3, plagiarism a serious problem. This week a total of eight students have plagiarized facts or suspicion of plagiarism, it has been shown in the results column plagiarism or suspected words to label, if any objections, please apply to the teacher review.
4, formatting problems. Already a sophomore, intends to gradually reduce the proportion of scores in the format in favor of more focus on the discussion of content and intellectual performance results. If the discrepancy on the format or its own characteristics, can ignore the basic standard, superior who can be a plus, but there are still some students, even the basic format can not be guaranteed. Therefore this standard is the basis for additional formatting problems.
Fourth, efforts direction
1, due to the more cultured subjective judgment of the students, will not be used after the video recorded last semester of ways. Great God and turn to find blog, code templates, online classes and video mode. Its purpose is: to show the students standard, proven knowledge, understanding and contact let itself become knowledge through the "assimilation", cultivate independent thinking.
2. Strict format and plagiarism issues. Formatting problems speaking Again, the next level will be to deal directly d. Plagiarism will feature interviews way, change their thinking. If not, consider giving appropriate.
V. Summary results table
