Self introduction
Bright spot
- skill
- Sophomore spent months doing ( "director") won the national high school students had a Textbook Plays xxx Silver, is a failure, do not know how to comment on
- Amateur violin enthusiast, has studied for seven years, for a long time did not practice leading to skill point drop
- other
- Work is not bad mood, depressed mood never leave until the next day
- Good listener, willing to communicate with people, more suitable for a team member
- Cautious and to speak without mouth hi ...
- After-school hobby broader but with the mood and state becomes fast (think bright spot ^. ^)
- ……
- Self-awareness very rich: the bright spot can be a lot of columns, column asked me if the bright spot can also reverse many columns
status quo
undergraduate, pre-phd, junior programmer (the difference between c ++ and c only know how classes and objects that, python only to write great code and work with neural network based framework), followed by older students had done some low- level visual computing work. Daily to find information, see the paper, read, occasionally sports (running, mild fitness, badminton table tennis table tennis on conditional). I chose this cyber-security professional time, subjective reasons are very interested in, in order to adapt to the information age trend (herd mentality), but security is a very important and relatively stable development of the field; an objective reason is believed the four major professional hospital I have several other very much like to avoid a required course. After selecting the jobs I quickly entered the laboratory and do is not relevant professional direction, possibly because of the love of the wonderful animated film special effects, I began to understand the multimedia aspects of the research. Actually my college life Three views have had a great impact, USTC "learning" crazy atmosphere seeped into my life, whether it is tempered on academic or exchange bits and pieces of dialogue and mentor, but the most impressive thing "exam did not test well" kind of "Code wrong," the frustration, so also need to constantly upgrade their skills in IT, such as the following points is very important to me:
| Skills | Estimation before courses | Expected estimation after course | Measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| programming: comprehension | 5 | 7 | read paper and browse GitHub code |
| Programming: Design | 5 | 7 | coding |
| programming: Implementation | 5 | 7 | coding |
| program: performance | 4 | 6 | read some materials and do experiments |
| programing: BigData | 1 | 4 | learn from my partners and process some big datasets |
| Supporting Knowledge: Mathematics | 4 | - | learning by doing |
| Presentation | 6 | - | learning by doing |
I read some of the ASE recommended blogs, combine the values of their own in the form of HKUST.
School attendance problems seriously
I refute what point of view cited this blog. This paper initially presents a general view "do not listen to the water courses, specialized courses listen", then denied this view, and that "students in class is to listen carefully." I do not agree with its negation and perspectives, first of all it does not have a standard to what is good and what is the lesson of water courses, this good or bad just a small group of students on a small part of the objective facts gives a subjective ? Conclusion CMMI model or type after in-depth analysis to get it? A course to learn to what extent should be determined by the course of its quality and importance of your (the importance of good judgment), in my opinion based on the fact that it can be roughly described as "water classes do not listen, general lesson listen, good class attendance also concerned about the additional content ", and where" water course "" good lesson "is not a person wayward subjective, but the result of rational analysis, not to listen to the key problem is that how to judge the quality of the courses on this problem. So I quoted several former main cultural point of view and refute the view below.
First, listen carefully, attentively, to keep up the rhythm, carding ideas is an ability.
- These capabilities do not necessarily need to pass "(all) students on courses is to listen carefully" to develop. These capabilities are also about empathy.
Second, speaking of course can not be a reason not to bad attendance.
- Do not speak of listening can be the reason of it? It can not be a reason not to, since attendance can not be a reason that attendance can use this argument to explain how bad lesson should carefully listen to it?
- A (or several) student said the teacher speaks rotten, the authors believe that this course does not mean that spoke bad, I also agree with this view. But telling bad lesson we must listen to it? If, when the course has irrefutable evidence of rotten, we must listen carefully to it?
Third, the curriculum is not useful to useless able to determine a pattern of college students.
I also agree with this view, useful useless same or even not a single authoritative scientists can accurately determine, so there are two problems:
- What is useful for? Work and earn money for their graduation helpful? Or useful to enhance their professional capacity? Or even useful to make people happy? Which of course is no use of it? Professors are more or less what it will play little role in a person's life long, because the future is not yet clear, the role we can give lessons to sort classification but can not fault it useless.
- Useful would be sure to carefully listen to it? Value is what we have achieved, different from the ideals and beliefs. As we seek to maximize the value, in fact, it is the pursuit of something unfulfilled - ideal. Today, institutions of higher education students is not the lack of resources, but do not know how to choose the resource and repeatedly missed opportunities. Since so many lessons are useful, in addition to the lessons there are so many useful things, we need to sort classification of its own demand to choose in order to obtain an optimal solution. Researchers often used to quickly boarded the habit of climbing a mountain and not long on this mountain, which fall into local optimum rather than the global optimum.
In summary, this article lists the benefits of three serious lectures, as well as a scenario assumes a relevant fact, does have some truth to stand on Ta perspective, is worthy of respect appreciation point of view, but Ta tend to explain the serious lectures benefits (in fact, no serious lectures do something else also good), lacks some compared to other scenarios (such as not serious lectures comparison with the benefits of homework away).
So students do not want to listen carefully? People should respect their feelings, try to ensure that when they are in class "learning area." My point is, if not more confused students for their bright future planning, it is recommended to listen carefully, if you have a great idea or very sure, that according to the status and quality of courses, their ability, through research and rational analysis (based on the model, experience, the teacher asked the students, etc.) to determine how it was later on.
Teaching methods: teacher-student relationship, means
The ideal teacher-student relationship is the relationship Coach / Trainee, students should raise the level of resources to support the coach in personally, the two sides timely feedback. I am also more concerned about - how to use the optimal price, after this course . The minimum cost and the best is still a little different, the learning process is not practical minimum total gives a sense of some of the issues may be difficult to leave a deep image also said that the cost of harvesting in a sense.
plan
I now proceed to some of the texture compression work MSRA Media Computing Group. Short-term (one or two years) will still continue to study low-level media computing, the future would like to involve some social multimedia / media analysis work, hope to complete during the Phd in some research areas of interest and implement a slam small conference paper . A few years later , I would still choose to do academic research, but will also focus on the integration of production, more meaningful to do original work. After my research career has reached a certain stage ( 15-20 years ), become a certain level of researcher, I might transition to other more industries such as education, management, and even the creation, so today I am in IT research in addition to the work, free time will be interesting to see some of the wealth of books and experienced managers as well as dealing with, I do not want to compare with other students, can learn to communicate with them some experience, but as long as they love their own choices like this kind of planning may be more appropriate person to resolve my INFP personality type.
About ASE
"Building of the law" Book
As early as the first time on the course of modern software engineering, in response to the call of the instructor, I have read the previous chapters of this book (Chapter 1 ~ 8) and wrote in the blog garden reading notes ( CH 1 ~ 3 , 4-6 , 7-8 ). "Building of the law," we advocate "learning by doing", in the center of the software development process in order to "people" as the center rather than the software itself. The contents of this book can be divided into two parts (from my sight of view), software development and testing of all test work except for development, and the latter was defined work order PM.
ASE as a classic textbook, the purpose is to let teachers and students to effectively practice of some commercial software engineering development processes, methods, tools. If this book as a development software, then it's typical user is the student, then whether it can poke pain point high school students do? I was fortunate with the school over the course of this book, while program carried out while reading this book, my biggest feeling is: workload, impressed my other classes do not have time to do. If the student is a user, a software program is the demand that the "products" there are so few points: a good points, learn something, not very large workload, credits and more . Some of the more specific and some vague, of course, this demand is not realistic, because in itself, there are some negative correlation between grade, credits, workload, after all, under the management of the school system and the education system is not possible to meet these requirements to develop a standard curriculum, but to find a balance if the vast majority of courses are in demand as far as possible to meet the needs of students and teaching on the relationship, then there is ASE course is upstream hope the two sides take to break this "seesaw" of shackles, on the quality of teaching to achieve a more idealized state, if the majority of the students in a busy academic pressure, the book recommended by a lot of material there is no time to read, textbooks will gradually become a tool; but Zou teacher in regard to teaching methods compare the number THU CMU courses and project discussions, although there are various other environmental factors are not the same, but the contrast is still well convince me: the burden is there but humans still acceptable.
As a "typical user", the book lists many things I often got its priorities wrong, or maybe every detail is important, so read actually feeling very tired, but can also be Yimushixing know a ballpark ( state b), reading perhaps not surprising that where there is any place. Through their own practice, I summed up a more acceptable (more scientific) way of reading: take a quick read, understand the important basic concepts to form a "big picture" in mind, doing some practice project, the project encountered problems when this reference back, serious consideration.
conclusion of issue
Be finishing ...