When writing the project encountered a problem
Suppose there is a control layer interface:
@ResponseBody @RequestMapping(value = "test", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces = "application/json;charset=UTF-8") public Result<String> test(String user, String number, String time){ String type="error"; try{ rType = SendType.create_send.toString(); return firstSendService.createSend(type,uName, pNum, time); }catch (Exception ex){ LOGGER.error(ex.getMessage(), ex); } return Result.failure(type, "fail of connect"); }
The front when calling this interface, and did not pass parameters, so the user, number, time will default to null.
Then in the service layer, there is a method
public Result<String> createSend(String type, String user, String number, String time) throws Exception { String token = "not fond"; try{ if(user.isEmpty() && StringUtils.isBlank(user)){ return Result.failure(type, "user is not null"); } StringBuffer stringBuffer = new StringBuffer(); stringBuffer.append(user).append(time); String signChar = stringBuffer.toString(); token = TokenUtil.sign(signChar); }catch (Exception ex){ LOGGER.error(ex.getMessage(), ex); } return Result.success(type, token); }
Wherein the verification about the parameters
if(user.isEmpty() && StringUtils.isBlank(user)){ return Result.failure(type, "user is not null"); }
Here's judgment conditions are not to be performed, to verify a bit
In other words, a method
Then look at StringUtils.isBlank ();
Then become null "" Try,
No problem, then try again StringUtils.isNotBlank ();
As shown above, isNotBlank () judgment is now turn of isBlank () of.
So, we come to a conclusion:
(0) for isEmpty (), when the character string is "" When, return true; however isEmpty () can not be used is determined null string, the null pointer exception will report errors,
Therefore isEmpty () to write more appropriate if (str == "" && str.isEmpty ()) {return}
(1) 相较于 isEmpty() 只能判断 "" 的字符串, isBlank() 的功能性要更大更完善一些, 当字符串为 null 时, isBlank() 为 true; isNotBlank() 则跟 isBlank() 相反, 为 false.
所以 isBlank() 更适合写 if( str == null && StringUtils.isBlank(str)){ return } 或者 if( str == "" && StringUtils.isBlank(str)){ return }
但是
这样是不行的, 看来 isBlank() 好像看起来要更加全能一些, 因为有时候参数有可能为 null, 也有可能为"" ,用 isBlank() 的话可以避免服务器停掉, 如何优雅的抛出错误或者异常, 且避免服务器的运行因此受到影响, 是我在努力的一个方向, 希望这些可以有些帮助
再补上一点
这就奇怪了, 话说上面的 if( a.isEmpty() || StringUtils.isBlank(a)){ } 中, || 不是如果左边不成功就使用右边的判断条件么? 为什么会直接报错呢? 那如果是 || 的判断是先判断左边, 那在 a == "" 的时候,为什么又可以成功运行? isEmpty() 这么坑的么?
再来一组对比
那还是强烈推荐使用 isBlank() 吧, "" 和 isEmpty() 是局限性有点大, 灵活性不够高, 容易出事....