Map database LightGraph test report

This test provides import LightGraph on Twitter graph, query, analysis efficiency, and compared with TigerGraph, Neo4j, JanusGraph, ArangoDB such as map database. According to test results, LightGraph performance in each scene is significantly superior to similar database.

 

  • Import Performance: LightGraph more than twice the performance of introducing and Neo4j TigerGraph is more than 35 times the JanusGraph and ArangoDB.
  • Delay query performance: Latency test query, the query performance significantly ahead of other LightGraph map database. TigerGraph -7 times 2.5 times, and more than 30 times Neo4j map data and the like.
  • Performance concurrent queries: query performance concurrent one-hop TigerGraph 6 times, and the times to reach more other databases FIG. Other concurrent query performance testing can reach more than 3 times that of other databases FIG.
  • Analysis algorithms performance: PageRank and Weakly Connected Components tests, LightGraph best performance, JanusGraph and ArangoDB can not complete the test

Query performance as shown below:

Detailed test report  click on the link  to download

https://fma-ai.cn/pdf/FMA_benchmark.pdf

Guess you like

Origin www.cnblogs.com/fmablogs/p/11412310.html