I once told my younger sister my learning system, and the basic five doctrines of my methodology. But unfortunately, she found out that the method is no use.
In the book of Think of Time as a Friend, a student asked Xiaolai Li, “Does this method work? Really work?” He replies yes, but the student is still doubted about this method. Li advises that you just use it for a period of time, and it will be batter than doing nothing. I agree with it. And this issue will be discussed at my next article.
But this conversation raises another question. Learn what? How to learn? I have some different opinions comparing to Li’s.
For example, Li talked about the experience about his learning at “Children’s Palace” as an elementary student, but finally used it at the age of 35 when he was writing a vocabulary book.
One has a target. So, what the person chooses to do (include what to learn) should be hooked up with his target. The smart person can differentiate the important things from the others. Otherwise, if one has three or more targets (e.g., learning TOEFL, learning Guitar and practicing workout) at the same time, he or she might not succeed in any one of them.
I quote the Google Officer Miltill, “the to-do list never seems to be shortened by the days”. Luckily, I find myself a person who likes to add items to his to-do list readily. And I finally find a rule of thumb: if one ticks even 0.1% (one-tenth of a percent) of the whole to-do list, then the person is excellent enough to achieve what he wants.
Time is limited; first thing first. This is for all the to-do lists, learning contents and time management.
An example: my classmate Xuan Li tells me, if it does not be examined, she does not learn it.
April 27, 2019
Never shortened to-do list solution
April 27, 2019
I told my sister I was learning systems, as well as five basic doctrines I methodology. Unfortunately, she found that this method is useless.
In "Take time as a friend," a book, one student asked Li Xiao, "this method useful? Really Work?" He answered yes, but students are still skeptical about this approach. Lee recommends that you only use it for some time, it will be better than doing nothing. I agree. This issue will be discussed in my next article.
But this raises another question dialogue. What to learn? How to learn? Compared with Lee, I have some different views.
For example, Li talked about his experience as an elementary school student in the "Children's Palace" to learn, but end up using it at the age of 35 to write a vocabulary book.
A person targeted. Therefore, the choice of what people do (including learning content) should be linked to his goal. Smart people can be separated from other important things and things district. Otherwise, if a person has three or more goals (eg, TOEFL learning, learning guitar and practice exercise), he or she may not be in any of the success.
I quote Google officials Mir Steele's words, "to-do list seems never to be shortened too." Luckily, I found myself like a man feel free to add items to his to-do list. I finally found a role of thumb: if a person even more than 0.1% (tenths of a percentage point) of the whole to-do list, then that person is enough to achieve the goal he wants.
Time is limited; first thing to do. This applies to all the to-do list, time management and learning content.
An example: my classmates Xuan Li told me that if not checked, she would not have to learn it.