Looked exam to see T1, that is the conclusion title, shook no results, went to see the second question,
Meaning of the questions is clear, begged the smallest ring fixed point, not thinking problem solving strategies, and then think it is a water problem
I called to find tarjan side double (said to be deep-fried but good average performance), the double edge in the demolition of violence while looking for the shortest path, we pay
T3 looked that violence could get 10min hand, hit the back of ... violence T1 (what kind of logic I should not have to predict with confidence rerun it)
After playing T1 violence like positive solution fails forcibly changed from n nmd ^ 4 only to make dp is independent of d, the retarded work most of the time spent
Assignment before 30min, T1 violent evolution complete
Assignment before 10min, T3 violence completion
Before 10min, I think they came up with positive solutions T1, crazy play yards
Former 2min, through the first five samples, 12,505,050 dead
Assignment, T1 even with wa t 20, T2 100, T3 20
Fortunately T1 ahead of playing violent, though they do not get the ideal of 30, but only if the sample had not written a "positive solution" then only 10 points
Later want to find positive solutions to the complexity of the examination room although theory can be had, but require complex inclusion and exclusion, achieve no avail
T1 promise that one day we agreed
DP [i] [j] denotes the number of put together by the j-th day i biscuit embodiment, the number of combinations +
T2 that day she left me
Features logn using a binary split into groups, grouping the shortest run, rather than my n times
T3 one day she will come back to me
When the exam is hazy feeling graph theory, try to no avail
The results indeed came up with a big cow on the map ...