The second phase of performance evaluation

Team members: Ray rain

Evaluation criteria and scores		Excellent (10 points) good (8 points) Usually (6 points) poor (4 points) poor (2 points)		score	This column average	Weighting factor
work performance	1. Quality of work	Consider only the quality of work, compared with expectations, work process, in line with the degree of results (accuracy, repeat rate, etc.).		10	10	4
	2. workload	Consider only the amount of work completed. Within the responsibilities of the job, the team assigned to complete the work and the autonomy of the total work.		10
	3. Working speed	Consider just working speed, rapid completion of the work, timeliness, or without wasting time or drag phenomenon.		10
	4. Tasks degree of achievement	Compared with the target or expected value, working to achieve the target or the gap between standards, taking into account the work objectively difficult.		10
Ability to work	5. Planned	Work plan in advance the extent of work (content, time, number, program) to be a fair distribution of the effectiveness.		10	10	３
	6. resilience	For objective changes, to take measures (action) initiative, the effectiveness and the degree of dependence on the rest of the team work.		10
	7. improve innovation	No strong sense of the problem in order to effectively work, initiative and effectiveness in improving the work.		10
Attitude	8. Cooperative	Interpersonal, teamwork and work with others to cope with the situation.		8	8	３
	9. attitude	Work consciousness, enthusiasm; the degree of commitment to the work, enterprising spirit, the degree of diligence, responsibility and so on.		8
Reviews			Ⅰ (1∽4 term average) × 4 + (5∽7 average) × 3 + (8∽9 term average) =. 3 × 94 minutes

Team members: Wang Jialiang

Evaluation criteria and scores		Excellent (10 points) good (8 points) Usually (6 points) poor (4 points) poor (2 points)		score	This column average	Weighting factor
work performance	1. Quality of work	Consider only the quality of work, compared with expectations, work process, in line with the degree of results (accuracy, repeat rate, etc.).		10	9.5	4
	2. workload	Consider only the amount of work completed. Within the responsibilities of the job, the team assigned to complete the work and the autonomy of the total work.		10
	3. Working speed	Consider just working speed, rapid completion of the work, timeliness, or without wasting time or drag phenomenon.		10
	4. Tasks degree of achievement	Compared with the target or expected value, working to achieve the target or the gap between standards, taking into account the work objectively difficult.		8
Ability to work	5. Planned	Work plan in advance the extent of work (content, time, number, program) to be a fair distribution of the effectiveness.		10	10	３
	6. resilience	For objective changes, to take measures (action) initiative, the effectiveness and the degree of dependence on the rest of the team work.		10
	7. improve innovation	No strong sense of the problem in order to effectively work, initiative and effectiveness in improving the work.		10
Attitude	8. Cooperative	Interpersonal, teamwork and work with others to cope with the situation.		10	10	３
	9. attitude	Work consciousness, enthusiasm; the degree of commitment to the work, enterprising spirit, the degree of diligence, responsibility and so on.		10
Reviews			Ⅰ (1∽4 term average) × 4 + (5∽7 average) × 3 + (8∽9 term average) =. 3 ×   98 minutes

Team members: Zhang Siyuan

Evaluation criteria and scores		Excellent (10 points) good (8 points) Usually (6 points) poor (4 points) poor (2 points)		score	This column average	Weighting factor
work performance	1. Quality of work	Consider only the quality of work, compared with expectations, work process, in line with the degree of results (accuracy, repeat rate, etc.).		10	9	4
	2. workload	Consider only the amount of work completed. Within the responsibilities of the job, the team assigned to complete the work and the autonomy of the total work.		8
	3. Working speed	Consider just working speed, rapid completion of the work, timeliness, or without wasting time or drag phenomenon.		10
	4. Tasks degree of achievement	Compared with the target or expected value, working to achieve the target or the gap between standards, taking into account the work objectively difficult.		8
Ability to work	5. Planned	Work plan in advance the extent of work (content, time, number, program) to be a fair distribution of the effectiveness.		10	10	３
	6. resilience	For objective changes, to take measures (action) initiative, the effectiveness and the degree of dependence on the rest of the team work.		10
	7. improve innovation	No strong sense of the problem in order to effectively work, initiative and effectiveness in improving the work.		10
Attitude	8. Cooperative	Interpersonal, teamwork and work with others to cope with the situation.		8	8	３
	9. attitude	Work consciousness, enthusiasm; the degree of commitment to the work, enterprising spirit, the degree of diligence, responsibility and so on.		8
Reviews			Ⅰ (1∽4 term average) × 4 + (5∽7 average) × 3 + (8∽9 term average) =. 3 ×   90 minutes

Team members: Chen Huan

Evaluation criteria and scores		Excellent (10 points) good (8 points) Usually (6 points) poor (4 points) poor (2 points)		score	This column average	Weighting factor
work performance	1. Quality of work	Consider only the quality of work, compared with expectations, work process, in line with the degree of results (accuracy, repeat rate, etc.).		8	9	4
	2. workload	Consider only the amount of work completed. Within the responsibilities of the job, the team assigned to complete the work and the autonomy of the total work.		10
	3. Working speed	Consider just working speed, rapid completion of the work, timeliness, or without wasting time or drag phenomenon.		10
	4. Tasks degree of achievement	Compared with the target or expected value, working to achieve the target or the gap between standards, taking into account the work objectively difficult.		8
Ability to work	5. Planned	Work plan in advance the extent of work (content, time, number, program) to be a fair distribution of the effectiveness.		10	10	３
	6. resilience	For objective changes, to take measures (action) initiative, the effectiveness and the degree of dependence on the rest of the team work.		10
	7. improve innovation	No strong sense of the problem in order to effectively work, initiative and effectiveness in improving the work.		10
Attitude	8. Cooperative	Interpersonal, teamwork and work with others to cope with the situation.		10	10	３
	9. attitude	Work consciousness, enthusiasm; the degree of commitment to the work, enterprising spirit, the degree of diligence, responsibility and so on.		10
Reviews			Ⅰ (1∽4 term average) × 4 + (5∽7 average) × 3 + (8∽9 term average) =. 3 × 96 minutes