View paper we discussed the issue of opinions and ideas, is the soul of a paper. Or something to be a problem analysis, commentary, indicating their views, positions, attitudes, beliefs and ideas, not vague. View clear is the premise of written papers, and we often in the essay writing will be guilty of the following questions.
First, the basic idea wrong paper. The basic idea is that the most basic knowledge of the main issues on the written paper, the paper is the writer of the most important questions of ideological views, if the basic point made a mistake, then it any other arguments are untenable argument.
Second, understanding point of view is not comprehensive enough. For more one-sided view of the problem, not the objective to cognition, detached from reality and so on.
Third, the lack of innovation point of view. Usually do not read literature, writing skills is not enough because it will result in no direction when writing papers, only nothing new and creative patchwork of someone else's paper and then write after finishing the collection, lack their own unique perspective. Innovation is a powerful driving force to promote social progress and economic development, can find answers to questions ideas, methods, measures from the data or others on the basis of previous studies, but also in compliance with the premise of the title information and the information given limited next, by association, to find valuable and relevant theories or facts from their own knowledge and experience of others to avoid duplication of research, in line with objective reality from a new angle of observation, the use of new research methods as much as possible to be different.
Fourth, the view is not clear enough vague. The main problems to be solved for the paper, as well as focus on the purpose of the argument is not clear, it will lead to the final point of view papers blurred.
Fifth, the cognitive point of view of the lighter. For the view from the surface of the paper only cognitive, understand its deeper meaning, for reality or disciplinary research, there is no academic value.
Sixth, the documentary material collected and views do not coincide unity. Some made a point of no relevant information to demonstrate, while others cited a number of documentary material was out of touch with the main point of view can not support the view.
Seven, saying conflicting views are not uniform, the same views on the issue of sub-arguments and conclusions uncoordinated.
Author: paperfree