If you want to take down the ceiling on the ceiling, you are willing to stand on the shoulders of others up to get it? Standing on a ladder or want to take?
Normal person would choose a ladder. Saying the lyrics to sing: "A man's shoulders unreliable"! With the ladder, who stood above are easy to pick up. If you stand on the shoulders of others, so take things for all people depend on the underlying high, only God knows the results. In other words, the system is more important than people.
Vanke chairman Wang Shi once said: "I never cultivate successors, I was training the team, I establish a system to establish a brand is how I build this team, I think the team is a comprehensive team building among the need to grasp.?. the first point is the system; second, not transparent black box; third, the specification does not trickery; fourth, talk about responsibility, "said is the truth.
But then again, this ladder, the system is also a man-made, that man-made ladder is very important for businesses. Man-made ladder outstanding, climb the ladder of people it is not so important. In short, specific work, people must not as good as the machine, but the machine but is man-made. Therefore, as long as good people who made the machine, with the machine that people who are not the most important.
In reality, most people are general laborers, difficult to have so many talented people. Many companies confuse the concept of "people-oriented" and "rule of man" in together. "People-oriented" stressed from the people, caring for people, but not the "rule of man."
Role of the system
September 25 each year in the town square in Barcelona, Spain, there will be the traditional "tower man" show, in honor of the patron saint of the city. To stacked in a human tower requires about 250 people, most of them located at the bottom of the tower base to ensure stability, but most people still top in danger. Many look at the fire scene, our fire fighters as long as a ladder, to climb more than the height of so many people to build a "human tower", but also easily trapped down to save. Comparing the two, it goes without saying. Therefore, a large number of enterprises in fact is the system defect, but is not the so-called lack of talent. Excellent business should jump rely on people, should rely on people rather than relying on people, especially the people can rely entered into the system.
Good system can make the bad guys have no chance to do bad things; otherwise, good people can go wrong. In real life a lot of things to tell us the same truth: the conference room phone signal jammers definitely better than the host repeatedly stressed that discipline is more effective, many hospitals after the computer called the number, queue jumping phenomenon disappeared without a trace. These are actually the same reason.
For businesses, people really so important to you? Not necessarily. Red classic song "Honghu Red Guards" inside, saying the lyrics called "high-rise this poor repair." Imagine: construction company workers are usually the most basic level of human society, and the team is very unstable, but why they can build a high-tech high-rise buildings it?
It lies in drawing and strict management control system. Therefore, the company must rely on a rational system, and with a strict scientific control system. Also, inmates in prison is the need to transform the special people, why they can make a good product, and even many state-owned enterprises are engaged in products but they? Or rely on legal and police officers. The Liangshan, 108 are heroes, why eventually fail? Why did they not do something? The reason is that they are more fraternal loyalty, and the lack of a common and excellent organizational and management systems.
As long as the "rule of man" to the system of governance, what people can use. Therefore, firms are not different people into different positions, but should be a system to let anyone can use this post. If the business can not do this, it is difficult to become an international group of companies.
How to establish a system?
The overall system can be divided into a business structure, mechanism and regulation of three categories. Establish a system must first clearly distinguish the structure, mechanism and regulation of the three. System is the operating principle of the whole system, which determines you in the end is high-end, mid-range or low-grade sedans, deciding in the end is the patriarchal or modern enterprise system. Mechanism is to give sedans with engine, deciding what kind of talent introduction and evaluation and incentive mechanism. Regulation is responsible for how the combination of parts and how to open the car, specifically how to do business.
In addition to corporate and institutional system as a whole, but also institutional sectors and job system. Many companies only macroscopic overall system, but there is no accompanying meso and micro system, that company-level system has not been deepened and detailed and concrete to departments and positions. Such a system can only fly in the sky.
Macro system level consideration by the Board, meso and micro policy is to be considered by the manager layer. Many companies ignore the institutional managers in macrocosm and microcosm, did not expect to take the ladder, just think of a pyramid; did not expect the system to think only to complete the task. Many managers just results, regardless of process, norms and standards, regardless of the work of human behavior. Like to give you a car, just tell you where to open, no matter how open it. In fact, an efficient organization system, also need to have a good control system with auxiliary.
From the point of view of the relationship between people and things, the system can be divided into "law, rule, on the" three aspects: the "law" reflects the law of things, emphasizing the scientific rationality; "law" is to set out the general requirements of human behavior ; "on" when talking about specific things, correspondence between "law" and "law". In the specific transaction, "law, law, theory" is a combination of the three. But many companies have neither the "law", no "theory", only a few simple "law" is clearly insufficient.
In many companies, employees are often based on the command is not the boss decided to do it or not, in fact, first of all subordinate should not hide, but should be based on compliance regime. In fact, the boss's orders and should experience significant conversion system into the text, so that we can all see, when the effect is quite different; of course if the text of the system and then transformed into the materialized tool, even higher efficiency .