The current blockchain has long passed the era of horse racing. It will only become more and more difficult to do blockchain according to the previous way of undertaking projects. After several years of technology accumulation, companies doing blockchain projects have almost declined.
Blockchain is not an industry that can quickly show profitability. On the contrary, the current model of this industry is still in its early stages, whether it is the industry brought about by blockchain technology itself or Web3.
At present, the domestic blockchain model is still relatively simple. They are all making some attempts in the form of undertaking projects or some subject research, and they are just some attempts. The TOC model has no follow-up after NFT and traceability projects, and it was also suppressed by the upper management. Facts have proved that it is right to hold on. Now the NFT market of the public chain has almost collapsed.
When the blockchain model is relatively single, it is relatively difficult to achieve technological breakthroughs and development in the industry; because the business scenarios are not supplemented, the business scope will become narrower and narrower, because some of the original business scenarios will be verified. And eliminated. Therefore, under the current circumstances, blockchain should look for a model that can break the situation. If TOB is not good, it can only find a way on TOC. So I personally think that domestic blockchain manufacturers should try the TOC model. Otherwise, the current dilemma will make it increasingly difficult for blockchain companies.
In fact, the technology update cycle of enterprises is slower than the update cycle of the Internet, and it is slower than the technology update of government units. However, the domestic blockchain industry seems to have messed up the technology update of this cycle, and has directly developed into enterprises, directly becoming TOB. model, but companies don’t know how to get to TOC, which leads many companies to feel that this thing is not a rigid demand; because the business value cannot be passed on, a closed loop of the business model cannot be formed, and in the end the cost is all in the hands of the company. For example, a certain farm has a blockchain traceability code. The buyer doesn’t care about the traceability code at all. If you tell him that it uses blockchain, he doesn’t care at all, just like the traceability code issued by Alibaba’s Tmall International. , there is actually little usage. Therefore, we must first let everyone accept this industry and model (not the Token direction, but the technology itself) before we can achieve future industry development.
Sometimes I wonder if the domestic alliance chain itself is a misunderstanding of the term. B2B is called an alliance, so is TOC also an alliance? Is it the basic chain? In fact, the public chain has been developing for many years. In the beginning, there was an incident of buying pizza with 2000 BTC. However, the reason why the public chain develops so fast is because of its profitability. Domestic blockchain has been established, and we can only develop business slowly. But to develop TOC business, is there a lack of public chain-like infrastructure in China, whether it is for testing or normal use, and can publish smart contracts? . At present, it is not available in China. Blockchain manufacturers currently do not have an operational basic chain for ordinary users to use. I think this is very unfavorable to the development of blockchain. A formal chain should be made public, different from the BSN network, but a domestic blockchain network like ETH or BTC, used for the popularization of TOC blockchain. , some small games can be released on the chain; of course, this blockchain network should have some basic products. Currently, only a few leading manufacturers have the ability to do this.
When the technology can be recognized by ordinary people, the enterprise update cycle will come on a large scale; otherwise, it will be difficult to develop only relying on the current blockchain project model.
Personally, I feel that the next national-level application may be in the field of blockchain. At present, it seems that the future of the blockchain industry has opportunities.
What you say may not be correct. Everyone is welcome to leave a message for discussion.