An article to understand the "intent"-centered Intent-Centric architecture that prioritizes results

Web3 user experience is one of the reasons that hinders the large-scale adoption of blockchain, and the Intent-Centric architecture greatly simplifies the user experience threshold.

Ac-Core : Elements required to realize the intention : 1) Account abstraction: Use bundler and payment contract to complete the narrow intention suitable for developers; 2) Programmability: Complex instructions can be divided into 4 categories, including centralization Intentions, structured intentions, distributed intentions and intelligent intentions; 3) MEV: To realize the user's intention, the transaction needs to be handed over to a third-party outsourced processing; 4)

Cross-chain, sorter and oracle : 5) Aggregator and Gas: The aggregator is designed to save users the trouble of finding the best transaction path and profit strategy, and Gas is an indispensable toll fee for executing various transactions. At present, the optimization is mainly focused on the product side, account abstract wallet, and DeFi protocol; 6) Wallet authorization: The purpose of the Intent-Centric architecture is to simplify transactions and reduce the user threshold, and each intended transaction will involve countless authorization signatures. Therefore, how to solve the authorization problem also needs to be considered. [Original text in English]

General solutions to realize the intention : 1) Anoma: Initially developed based on Tendermint and using the Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) consensus mechanism, and then turned to another PoS proof-of-stake consensus mechanism "Typhon" developed by Heliax to allow for independent chains. Carry out consensus division among them. Its design architecture and innovation points include private payment, barter transactions, intent matching system, multi-chain support and fractal scaling expansion plan; 2) SUAVE: Build an intent-centered infrastructure. SUAVE's vision is to become a common sorting layer between various different chains, so if the user intends to involve cross-chain asset transfer, Account Abstraction (AA) and multi-signature smart contract accounts (SCW) such as Gonsis Safe combine the advantages of both parties. Combined with SUAVE's EVM solution, it may be a better solution in theory; [Original text in English]

3) CowSwap: Unlike other protocols, user transactions on CowSwap only need to send a signature order, entrust the execution of the transaction to the solver network, and complete the transaction in the network. At the same time, the off-chain signature order will be processed by the solver. Execute after matching; 4) dappOS V2: Designed to simplify user interaction with dApp to achieve a CeFi-level user experience. At the same time, the "chain abstraction" technology eliminates the fragmentation obstacles caused by multiple chains.

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/FENGQIYUNRAN/article/details/133311856