Source | Qubit
Author | Zephyr
Recently, Cursor, an AI code editor, has become popular—by virtue of its access to GPT-3.5/GPT-4, it can realize cross-file questioning and execution operations, and has become the new king of papers in one fell swoop. Ma Ma no longer has to worry that I have to go through the files one by one, if you have any questions, just chat chat:
GPT-3.5/GPT-4 does not understand the latest knowledge, and there is no need to copy and paste in the dialog box.
Cursor can directly "eat documents", now see the summary:
If the code execution fails, it can also be automatically debugged, repeatedly letting the AI think about what is wrong & how to solve it:
Let's just say who doesn't think it's easy to operate? It can be explained by who is popular and the number of likes continues to soar:
Cursor is also known by netizens as the best AI code editor and the most advanced IDE in terms of integration with AI:
Some netizens abandoned VS Code+Copilot and left Cursor, saying:
Love love love.
Ah... is it true that VS Code, known as the king of scrolling kings, is about to fall out of favor?
Cursor=VS Code+AI
We don't know whether VS Code will fall out of favor, but it is very simple to transfer from VS Code to Cursor. You can even directly import all themes, plugins, settings, etc. of VS Code with one click:
Because Cursor is actually a branch of VS Code. VS Code old fans are ecstatic:
Feel at home.
In addition, when dealing with the code, it can be said that there is no strongest but stronger. Anything that is applicable to VS Code is also applicable to Cursor, such as Jupyter plug-ins are also available. Generating code from scratch or refactoring code in one file to optimize it or fix bugs is a no-brainer:
Here is a quick example, using AI to easily generate code and add modifications with one click:
Here is another task, which is not difficult to implement:
Featured features do not need to be copied and pasted, after the code is generated, you can directly ask questions:
How easy it is to modify the lint code error:
As netizens said, I finally got rid of double-clicking the mouse:
Another netizen called out:
Increase productivity and change the rules of the game.
Since it's so easy to use, isn't it expensive? In terms of price, Cursor can be said to have a clearly marked price, and there are also some that don’t cost money. Cursor provides a free package with a total of 50 slow GPT-4 uses (slow GPT-4 uses), and 200 monthly GPT3.5 experiences.
If you want to get more usage times, there is a package of $20 per month, unlimited use of GPT-3.5 and slow version GPT-4, and 500 monthly fast version GPT-4 (fast GPT-4 uses) experience . In addition, there is an API payment method directly facing OpenAI, and all modes will have unlimited usage times. After using it, netizens said that even the slow version of GPT-4 responds very quickly, within 5-7 seconds:
Even the developers ran to the bottom of the relevant comments and shouted:
Large model research test portal
GPT-4 Portal (free of wall, can be tested directly, if you encounter browser warning point advanced/continue to visit):
Hello, GPT4!
If you think Cursor is slow, come to me.
Explosions are also controversial
But in addition to praise, there are also netizens who are dissatisfied with the experience:
I tried it and thought it would be cool. But disappointed, switched back, and deleted it. Not as cool as advertised.
Some netizens also want "bicycles":
Looks interesting, but disappointingly it's not open source yet.
Also at issue are privacy issues:
How do people protect privacy issues when using these tools? Is the entire code base really just uploaded to Cursor (or other tools)?
Other netizens raised questions:
include provides a free plug-in cody that supports vscode, you can also view all files in the workspace, and you can modify files inline. Since the cursor is paid, what advantages does it have in comparison?
