What if the company does not pay compensation for layoffs?

It takes about 1.61 minutes to read this article.

Recently, when answering questions from golfers on the planet, I found that many people mentioned the topic of layoffs.

Some golfers said that their company is laying off staff, but they don't want to pay compensation.

The plan given to him by the leader was to take his annual leave, and then give him another three weeks to find work time. During these three weeks, he would not need to clock in, and he would resign voluntarily after three weeks.

The golfer himself did not agree and asked for N+1. He also said that his company has laid off many people this year, and there is basically no compensation. Many people are left for arbitration after being laid off (the company’s social security payment is the lowest, and some colleagues complained to the company after being laid off) Social security, some successful); the company will use various methods to force resignation, some are forced to transfer, some are forced to take vacations and only pay basic wages, and some directly force resignation and stop the job number system.

Now the leader has fed back his appeal. As for how it will develop in the future, I don’t know what to do. Ask me if you have any opinions and suggestions.

I have written about the topic of layoffs before. Nowadays, many companies are under pressure to survive. It is understandable to lay off employees at the lowest cost. Everyone is familiar with these.

Regarding layoffs, my consistent view is to be prepared with both hands.

On the one hand, it is important to quickly find a next home and ensure a stable source of income.

On the other hand, it is to strive for compensation. If you insist on going to arbitration, you must weigh the time and cost.

Now when it comes to layoffs, in fact, everyone has nothing against it. What everyone hates or disgusts is that the company does not pay compensation for layoffs.

As this golfer mentioned, it is not surprising that the company will use various means to force resignation. Remember a case I mentioned earlier? It is said that a company has a check-in system. At the beginning, many employees would ask someone to check-in when they were a little late.

Who would have thought that the company was going to lay off employees, and the layoffs would have to be compensated, but the boss of this company is a thug, and those who check in on behalf of them will be fired directly for violating the company's regulations, and the compensation will be directly saved. Those who are expelled have no choice but to suffer from being dumb.

So keep an eye on it. If your company suddenly puts forward higher requirements for clock-in, reimbursement, lateness, task arrangement, performance appraisal, etc., you should pay attention and be vigilant against the company's small things.

In fact, individuals are very weak to companies, and in many cases they cannot consume the company. It also shows that it is difficult for ordinary people to protect their rights.

I saw through this kind of thing very early on.

Because there are too many unfair things in this society, and various unfair things happen every day, which may happen in the workplace, or in schools and other places. Many things are slowly consumed, big things become small, and small things become small.

If it weren't for the development of the mobile Internet now, some things would be aroused by public opinion and get attention, and it might be forgotten after such a waste of time. The original Netease layoff incident was a very typical case.

In fact, it is not only Netease, how many companies in the industry are not like this? No matter how big a company is, if it wants to lay off you, there will be various unspoken rules and reasons to prevent you from getting compensation.

For an enterprise, it is not a small sum to compensate so many people. Being able to consume you until you voluntarily resign without compensation is also one of their means of increasing revenue and reducing expenditure.

Some people will insist on spending with them. For example, I also saw some golfers share their experiences in the planet. For example, one is to be tough, and some people are actually bullying and afraid of being tough. Seeing that you insist on arbitration, your attitude will converge. I will talk to you about the compensation plan in detail. The other is to collect and keep the evidence of going to work, screenshots, photos, videos, audio recordings, etc.

aa1c66e450dcb8f0ff2cd135db37b409.png

This point can indeed be referred to. After all, if we always give in blindly, then many companies will become as accustomed to "no compensation for layoffs" as "996 is welfare".

Therefore, for those who are laid off but the company does not pay compensation, and you are not afraid of time-consuming or troublesome, it is recommended to insist on arbitration. Now arbitration is to protect workers, which means that you can get it with a high probability. N+1 compensation.

In the face of the company's layoffs and no compensation, learn to fight for it. At the same time, it is still a commonplace point to make yourself stronger. For example, accumulate more influence and polish your professional ability.

Employees who can do this are basically not afraid, and companies generally do not lay off such people. Taking a step back, even if you are laid off, you can quickly find a better next home, and it is even possible to become your own boss.

Recommended reading:

A benefit for children on June 1st.

3 very dry AI sharing.

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/googdev/article/details/130998511