Recently, the AI hotspot seems to be gradually fading away. Many people feel that everything is just a concept, and everyone just follows the trend, and everything returns to its original state.
After the hype of the media, many people are trying to use AI tools, but most of them are just trying to use them as talking points, or showing off how they found out that AI is not smart enough.
It is still a few people who are really used in actual combat and produce real value, and this is precisely the opportunity of a few people.
Some people think that AI entrepreneurship requires advanced technology and professional knowledge. In fact, this is a big misunderstanding. Ordinary people can use AI to achieve a rapid leap in ability and a rapid manifestation of personal value.
Let’s say I’m doing dissertation tutoring as an example. My side job has always been to guide undergraduate or graduate students to produce a qualified dissertation quickly.
Now with ChatGPT, many friends can already use AI tools to use some of the skills I have mastered to quickly complete the writing of thesis.
In this scenario, ChatGPT is just a human assistant, not a human substitute. AI can quickly provide a large amount of material and corpus, and the final material integration still depends on itself.
For another example, if a graduate student wants to publish a journal, the language and text of the paper need to be polished, and AI is fully capable of this, making the paper more academic.
For another example, ChatGPT can generate many research directions according to the topics you require, and provide ideas for your thesis topic selection.
For another example, the writing of theoretical research chapters and how to briefly summarize the literature you refer to can all be handled with ChatGPT.
You can use ChatGPT for any boring work you can think of, and improve your work efficiency through some methods and techniques.
You may say, I also used ChatGPT, but the effect is not as good as you said?
That's because you didn't use some techniques. For example, if you also use Baidu to search for information, some people can't find the information they need for a long time, while some people can quickly find the information they need just by entering a few keywords.
So, is ChatGPT a human replacement? No. It's just our assistant. Don't be ambiguous about this position. Thoughts are ours, and AI just wants to provide us with some material.
At least the time saved, it can be said that it takes 180 man-days to write a high-quality paper purely manually, but with the help of ChatGPT, it only takes 80 man-days to write a paper of the same quality.
Based on the above, for individuals, AI is an omnipotent and good-tempered tutor. We can use AI to improve our ability and expand our knowledge.
In addition, many people have used AI to learn IELTS, learn English writing, let AI score, revise, and give references to model essays. If some practitioners want to seek positions in related foreign companies, or even expatriate positions, IELTS scores and English communication skills may be good points.
For example, if a product manager uses AI to learn programming, learn how to implement functions, and how to optimize performance, many simple requirements may be realized by themselves, and the adaptability will be greatly enhanced.
Regarding the learning of artificial intelligence, I never think that more is better. With so many AI products, I don't think 90% of them need to learn and communicate. For each field, just choose the best tools. A large number of new AI products are lifeless, and attention itself is a waste of energy and time.
For generative text AI, ChatGPT is recommended, and for generative painting AI, MidJourney or Stable Diffusion is recommended.
The purpose of learning is to use it, and it is your harvest to be able to use it in actual combat. If you can make good use of a product, a tool, and have a real improvement in your actual work, this value is huge, compared to what you see Dozens of articles and hundreds of online classes are important.