Article directory
1. The use of two sets of rules in the interest game
1. The use of two sets of rules
In the game of interests , something is beneficial to the interests of party A and harms the interests of party B.
The two interest alliances A and B will fight for the interests of the second set of rules under the banner of the first set of rules (explicit rules-morality/benevolence/righteousness/law) ;
You cannot use the first set of rules to coerce/coerce one party to give up the interests of the second set of rules. This is an idiot's behavior, and only fools will be coerced/inclined to give up their own interests;
- If this enemy (before counted as friends and relatives, but now counts as enemies) has no intersection with other networks of yours, directly point out the second set of rules, isn’t it good to have a pure interest relationship; this is basically tearing your face;
- If this enemy intersects with other networks of yours, such as: relatives, classmates; then make a decision according to the second set of rules, and then use the first set of rules to package it; it is still useful to keep this relationship, and maintain it first;
2. Hide the first set of rules
Don't talk about interests nakedly with others. The second set of rules can do it, but you can't say it. The mature way is to use the first set of rules to package it, and then release it to the outside world;
The superficial politeness still needs to be maintained, don't speak too bluntly;
The rules that keep the world running are the second set of rules - the rules of interest;
The sign of maturity is to see through but not to speak;
The second set of rules can only be used, not spoken, and you will be condemned by God if you speak it out. Don’t, don’t; this is why many people tell the truth and are hated by others;
Behavior in the world must follow the first set of rules to be orthodox, what you say must conform to the first set of rules, but the underlying operating logic must abide by the second set of behavioral rules;
For example, if a benevolent person wants to donate property to his family without paying taxes, he directly establishes a charity fund in the name of his family, and transfers money to the fund in the name of charity;
Charity, if there is no benefit, then something will happen; don’t believe in any charity, don’t donate money, donated money may fall into someone’s pocket;
3. Confucianism - Legalism / Strategist
Confucianism of Confucius is the first set of rules. What you say can be used to restrain the general public. The ruler will spare no effort to promote Confucianism;
Han Feizi (Legalist Thought) / Guiguzi (Strengthenist Thought - Strategies) is the second set of rules, which are actually done, but cannot be said. The underlying logic of the ruling class and the world is this kind of thinking, and this kind of rules can only be used , cannot be advertised;
Obviously, the Confucianism of the first set of rules has spread far more widely than the Legalists and Strategists of the second set of rules;
Confucianism believes that human nature is inherently good, and it’s over if you believe it. Confucianism advocates that everyone should treat others as good people;
Legalism believes that human nature is inherently evil, and everyone should be guarded as a wicked person, and the heart of defense is indispensable;
A good person brainwashed by Confucianism is not necessarily a good person. Once such a person succeeds, he may quickly become a bad person;
A real good person has insight into the second set of rules, treats everyone as a villain to guard against, knows all the tricks/strategies, but does not harm others, this is a good person;
2. The usage scenarios of the two sets of rules
The usage scenarios of the two sets of rules in the interest game:
- Relatives borrow money, under the banner of the first set of rules, you can’t ignore death and kidnap you with morality/family affection/friendship;
- I determined according to the second set of rules, this relative did not give collateral and reasonable personal loan interest, high risk, low return or even no return,
- It is detrimental to my interests, do not lend money;
- But this matter cannot be clarified based on the results of the interest analysis, and he cannot be told that I am a miser and stingy, I have to wrap it up with the first set of rules;
- If it is determined not to borrow money, then start to use the first set of rules for packaging,
- I have all my money in the stock market. I got it in and lost hundreds of thousands. You borrowed so much money from me and I lost hundreds of thousands in cash. It’s too bad to take it out. You can’t watch me lose so much money, so this money can't borrow;
- You can find any reason for the packaging: I also owe foreign debts, a few children cost too much, investment losses, company bankruptcy, you can make up whatever you want;
Use the second set of rules (interests) to make decisions, and then use the first set of rules (morality/law) for packaging, which is what mature people should do;